Radicalisation and discursive accommodation: responses to rising Euroscepticism in the European Parliament

References

• Akkerman, Tjitjske (2015). ‘Immigration Policy and Electoral Competition in Western Europe: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Party Positions Over the Past Two Decades’, Party Politics, 21:1, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, Dimitri (2010). ‘Europeanized Eurosceptics? Radical Right Parties and European Integration’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11:3, 237–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Marie-Eve, and Frank Schimmelfennig (2021). ‘Politicization and Rebordering in EU Enlargement: Membership Discourses in European Parliaments’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:3, 407–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Marie-Ève, Liudmila Mikalayeva, and Frank Schimmelfennig (2020). ‘Constructing Europe’s Borders Project: Codebook’. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/472717.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Marie-Ève, and Natasha Wunsch (2022). ‘From Cohesion to Contagion? Populist Radical Right Contestation of EU Enlargement’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60:3, 653–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Julian, Christine Hackenesch, and Daniel Stockemer (2021). ‘Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe: What Impact Do They Have on Development Policy?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:1, 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenau, Jack, and Benjamin E. Lauderdale (2018). ‘Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: Agenda Setting and Legislative Voting in Response to the EU Crisis’, The Journal of Politics, 80:2, 462–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., and Miriam Hartlapp (2022). ‘Eurosceptic Contestation and Legislative Behaviour in the European Parliament’, in Petra Ahrens, Anna Elomäki and Johanna Kantola (eds.), European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., Philipp Broniecki, Miriam Hartlapp, and Lukas Obholzer (2023). ‘Contesting Europe: Eurosceptic Dissent and Integration Polarization in the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, Nathalie (2015). ‘The Roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and Their Implications for the EU’, International Political Science Review, 36:3, 337–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, Nathalie (2020). ‘Towards a Unified Anti-Europe Narrative on the Right and Left? The Challenge of Euroscepticism in the 2019 European Elections’, Research & Politics, 7:2, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, Nathalie, and Olivier Costa (2019). ‘Parliamentary Questions and Representation of Territorial Interests in the EP’, in Olivier Costa (ed.), The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformations. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 225–54.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, and Edgar Grande (2021). ‘Politicizing Europe in Elections to the European Parliament (1994–2019): The Crucial Role of Mainstream Parties’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:5, 1124–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, Swen Hutter, and Alena Kerscher (2016). ‘What Type of Europe? The Salience of Polity and Policy Issues in European Parliament Elections’, European Union Politics, 17:4, 570–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheysson, Anatole, and Nicolò Fraccaroli (2019). ‘Ideology in Times of Crisis: A Principal Component Analysis of Votes in the European Parliament, 2004–2019’, CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper Series, 17, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Chiru, Mihail, and Natasha Wunsch (2023). ‘Democratic Backsliding as a Catalyst for Polity-Based Contestation? Populist Radical Right Cooperation in the European Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy, 30:1, 64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close, Caroline, and Lidia Nuñez (2016). ‘At the Root of Parliamentary Party Cohesion: The Role of Intraparty Heterogeneity and Party Ideology’, Les Cahiers du Cevipol, 1, 2–36.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, Emanuel E (2009). ‘Reassessing the Influence of Party Groups on Individual Members of the European Parliament’, West European Politics, 32:6, 1099–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, and Johan Hellström (2016). ‘The Radical Right as Driving Force in the Electoral Arena?’, in Swen Hutter and Edgar Grande (eds.), Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 156–180.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuele, Vincenzo, Bruno Marino, and Davide Angelucci (2020). ‘The Congealing of a New Cleavage? The Evolution of the Demarcation Bloc in Europe (1979–2019)’, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 50:3, 314–33.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, Edgar, and Swen Hutter (2016). ‘Beyond Authority Tansfer: Explaining the Politicisation of Europe’, West European Politics, 39:1, 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, Reinhard, Duncan McDonnell, and Annika Werner (2021). ‘Equivocal Euroscepticism: How Populist Radical Right Parties Can Have Their EU Cake and Eat It’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:2, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, and Michael Marsh (2007). ‘Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections’, The Journal of Politics, 69:2, 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gérard Roland (2019). ‘Changing Political Cleavages in Advanced Democracies: Evidence from the European Parliament’, unpublished paper. https://eml.berkeley.edu/∼groland/pubs/HNR4_14JAN2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gérard Roland (2005). ‘Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001’, British Journal of Political Science, 35:2, 209–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2018). ‘Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:1, 109–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 965–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, Seth, Ryan Bakker, Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen, and Milada A. Vachudova (2022). ‘Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–’, Electoral Studies, 75, 102420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, Johanna, and Emanuela Lombardo (2021). ‘Strategies of Right Populists in Opposing Gender Equality in a Polarized European Parliament’, International Political Science Review, 42:5, 565–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, Johanna, and Cherry Miller (2021). ‘Party Politics and Radical Right Populism in the European Parliament: Analysing Political Groups as Democratic Actors’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:4, 782–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D., Anand Menon, and Jonathan Slapin (2014). ‘The European Union: Wider and Deeper?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:5, 643–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, James (2017). ‘The United Kingdom and EU Enlargement in the Western Balkans: From Ardent Champion of Expansion to Post-Brexit Irrelevance’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17:4, 555–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2015). ‘Bringing Salience Back In’, Party Politics, 21:4, 553–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, Amie, and Simon Hix (2003). ‘From "Grand Coalition" To Left–Right Confrontation: Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:1-2, 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominic Hoglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wuest, eds. (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J., and Harmen van der Veer (2019). ‘Issue Competition without Electoral Incentives? A Study of Issue Emphasis in the European Parliament’, The Journal of Politics, 81:4, 1240–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea L. P., Paul Taggart, and Stijn van Kessel (2018). ‘The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions’, Politics, 38:3, 378–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan Slapin (2015). The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Eebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan Slapin (2011). ‘Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 50:1, 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, Daniel, Denise Traber, and Kenneth Benoit (2017). ‘Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes’, Political Science Research and Methods, 5:2, 379–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traber, Denise, Lukas F. Stoetzer, and Tanja Burri (2023). ‘Group-Based Public Opinion Polarisation in Multi-Party Systems’, West European Politics, 46:4, 652–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Spanje, Joost, and Nan D. de Graaf (2018). ‘How Established Parties Reduce Other Parties’ Electoral Support: The Strategy of Parroting the Pariah’, West European Politics, 41:1, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Spanje, Joost, and Wouter van der Brug (2007). ‘The Party as Pariah: The Exclusion of Anti-Immigration Parties and Its Effect on Their Ideological Positions’, West European Politics, 30:5, 1022–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, Catherine de (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wunsch, Natasha, and Nicole Olszewska (2022). ‘From Projection to Introspection: Enlargement Discourses since the ‘Big Bang’ Accession’, Journal of European Integration, 44:7, 919–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch, Natasha. (2017). ‘Between Indifference and Hesitation: France and EU Enlargement Towards the Balkans’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17:4, 541–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar