Do voters want their parties to be office- or policy-seekers in coalition negotiations?

References

• Achen, Christopher, and Larry Bartels (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Christopher Wlezien (2016). ‘The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements’, American Journal of Political Science, 60:4, 811–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Simon Weschle, and Christopher Wlezien (2021). ‘Elite Interactions and Voters’ Perceptions of Parties’ Policy Positions’, American Journal of Political Science, 65:1, 101–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory (1997). ‘Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems’, American Political Science Review, 91:1, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Andrew J. LoTempio (2002). ‘Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America’, British Journal of Political Science, 32:2, 335–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariotti, Margaret H., and Sona N. Golder (2018). ‘Partisan Portfolio Allocation in African Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:3, 341–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, David A., and Raymond M. Duch (2010). ‘Why Can Voters Anticipate Post-Election Coalition Formation Likelihoods?’, Electoral Studies, 29:3, 308–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert M. (1970). Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna (2008). ‘Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Formation: Evidence from Swedish Local Government’, ‘ Party Politics, 14:1, 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, and Patrick Dumont (2011). ‘Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 50:4, 441–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, and Henry Bäck (2013). ‘Regional Government Formation in Varying Multilevel Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries’, Regional Studies, 47:3, 368–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Henk Erik Meier, and Thomas Persson (2009). ‘Party Size and Portfolio Payoffs: The Proportional Allocation of Ministerial Posts in Coalition Governments’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15:1, 10–34.
   Google Scholar
• Banducci, Susan A., and Jeffrey A. Karp (2003). ‘How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System: Campaigns, Media Effects and Electoral Outcomes in Comparative Perspective’, British Journal of Political Science, 33:3, 443–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, Kirk, Jens Hainmueller, Daniel J. Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto (2018). ‘The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments’, Political Analysis, 26:1, 112–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, Kirk, Jens Hainmueller, Daniel J. Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto (2021a). ‘Beyond the Breaking Point? Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments’, Political Science Research and Methods, 9:1, 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, Kirk, Jens Hainmueller, Daniel J. Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto (2021b). ‘Conjoint Survey Experiments’, in James N. Druckman and Donald P. Green (eds.), Advances in Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bargsted, Matias A., and Orit Kedar (2009). ‘Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 307–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi, Anna (2021). ‘Parties’ Preferences for Office and Policy Goals’, Games, 12:1, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria (2019). ‘The Effects of Party Identification on Perceptions of Pledge Fulfilment: Evidence from Portugal’, International Political Science Review, 40:5, 627–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, John H. Aldrich, Indridi H. Indridason, and Renan Levine (2006). ‘Do Voters Vote for Government Coalitions? Testing Downs’ Pessimistic Conclusion’, Party Politics, 12:6, 691–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Thomas Gschwend, and Indridi H. Indridason (2020). ‘Coalition Policy Perceptions’, The Journal of Politics, 82:4, 1458–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Gail McElroy, and Stefan Müller (2022). ‘Voter Expectations of Government Formation in Coalition Systems: The Importance of the Information Context’, European Journal of Political Research, 61:1, 111–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, Thomas, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, and Christian Stecker (2019). ‘Party Competition and Government Formation in Germany: Business as Usual or New Patterns’, German Politics, 28:1, 80–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (2021). ‘Nonunitary Parties, Government Formation, and Gamson’s Law’, American Political Science Review, 115:3, 917–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Swaan, Abram (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt (2020). Political Entrepreneurs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc (2021). ‘Parteienwettbewerb und Wahrscheinlichkeit verschiedener Koalitionsoptionen bei der Bundestagswahl 2021’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63:1, 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Martin Gross (2016). ‘Coalition Formation at the Local Level: Institutional Constraints, Party Policy Conflict, and Office-Seeking Political Parties’, Party Politics, 22:6, 835–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Jochen Müller (2013). ‘Do Voters’ Coalition Preferences Affect Government Formation’, West European Politics, 36:5, 1007–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Jochen Müller (2014). ‘Expected Utility or Learned Familiarity? The Formation of Voters’ Coalition Preferences’, Electoral Studies, 34, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin (2010). ‘Exploring the Stabilization of a Political Force: The Social and Attitudinal Basis of Green Parties in the Age of Globalization’, West European Politics, 33:3, 534–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duch, Raymond M., Jeff May, and David A. Armstrong (2010). ‘Coalition-Directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 104:4, 698–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duch, Raymond, and Randolph Stevenson (2013). ‘Voter Perceptions of Agenda Power and Attribution of Responsibility for Economic Performance’, Electoral Studies, 32:3, 512–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, Dominic, and François Pétry (2020). ‘Citizens’ Evaluations of Campaign Pledge Fulfillment in Canada’, ‘ Party Politics, 26:4, 437–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, Alejandro, and Thomas M. Meyer (2019). ‘Fairness and Qualitative Portfolio Allocation in Multiparty Governments’, Public Choice, 181:3–4, 309–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, Alejandro, Thomas M. Meyer, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2015). ‘The Distribution of Individual Cabinet Positions in Coalition Governments: A Sequential Approach’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:4, 802–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Matt (2018). ‘Policy-Seeking and Office-Seeking: Categorizing Parties Based on Coalition Payoff Allocation’, Politics & Policy, 46:1, 4–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, Thorsten, and Tristan Klingelhöfer (2022). ‘German Politics at the Traffic Light: New Beginnings in the Election of 2021’, West European Politics, 45:7, 1506–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcó-Gimeno, Albert (2012). ‘Preferences for Political Coalitions in Spain’, South European Society and Politics, 17:3, 487–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David (2019a). ‘The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy Making’, British Journal of Political Science, 49:1, 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David (2019b). ‘Legislative Review and Party Differentiation in Coalition Governments’, American Political Science Review, 113:1, 242–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David (2021). The Cycle of Coalition: How Parties and Voters Interact under Coalition Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and James Adams (2015). ‘How Voters’ Perceptions of Junior Coalition Partners Depend on the Prime Minister’s Position’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:3, 601–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and Randolph T. Stevenson (2013). ‘Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:2, 459–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, Randolph T. Stevenson, and Greg Vonnahme (2016). ‘Context and Political Knowledge: Explaining Cross-National Variation in Partisan Left-Right Knowledge’, The Journal of Politics, 78:4, 1211–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Martin (2018). ‘Sowing the Seeds of Love’? Determinants of Local Coalition Formation and Termination between the CDU and the Greens, 1994–2016’, German Politics, 27:3, 339–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Martin (2023). ‘Determinants of Government Membership at the Subnational Level: Empirical Evidence from Large Cities in Germany (1999–2016)’, Government and Opposition, 58:1, 145–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, and Marc Hooghe (2008). ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go? An Experimental Study on Voter Responses to Pre-Electoral Coalitions’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:5, 556–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, Michael F. Meffert, and Lukas F. Stoetzer (2017). ‘Weighting Parties and Coalitions: How Coalition Signals Influence Voting Behavior’, The Journal of Politics, 79:2, 642–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, Daniel J. Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto (2014). ‘Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments’, Political Analysis, 22:1, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Jeffrey A. Karp (2010). ‘Voters and Coalition Governments’, Electoral Studies, 29:3, 299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C. (2021). ‘Beyond Culture and Power: The Role of Party Ideologies in German Foreign and Security Policy’, German Politics, 30:1, 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg (2000). ‘Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation’, American Journal of Political Science, 44:2, 347–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Hanna Bäck (2019). ‘Coalition Agreements, Issue Attention, and Cabinet Governance’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:13–14, 1995–2031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, Svenja, and Heike Kluever (2022). ‘Cabinet Formation and Coalition Governance: The Effect of Portfolio Allocation on Coalition Agreements’, Government and Opposition, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth Benoit (2015). ‘The Basic Arithmetic of Legislative Decisions’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:2, 275–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1996). Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas J., Sara B. Hobolt, and James Tilley (2020). ‘Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments’, Political Analysis, 28:2, 207–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Ron (2012). ‘Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1295–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Nick C. N., Randolph Stevenson, Mathias Wessel Tromborg, and David Fortunato (2017). ‘Gamson’s Law and Voters’ Perceptions of Portfolio Allocation’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:4, 912–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur (2016). Uninformed: Why People Know so Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson (2001). ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 45:1, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson (2010). ‘The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation’, American Political Science Review, 104:3, 503–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2011). Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2020). ‘What You See is Not Always What You Get: Bargaining before an Audience under Multiparty Government’, American Political Science Review, 114:4, 1138–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthieß, Theres (2020). ‘Retrospective Pledge Voting: A Comparative Study of the Electoral Consequences of Government Parties’ Pledge Fulfilment’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:4, 774–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, Michael F., and Thomas Gschwend (2010). ‘Strategic Coalition Voting: Evidence from Austria’, Electoral Studies, 29:3, 339–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, Oskar, and John Von Neumann (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Peter Heyn (2020). ‘Popularity as a Measure of Portfolio Salience? The Case of Denmark’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 43:4, 286–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhuis, Dominic, and Carolina Plescia (2018). ‘The Nonideological Component of Coalition Preferences’, Party Politics, 24:6, 686–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, Carolina (2017). ‘The Effect of Pre-Electoral Party Coordination on Vote Choice: Evidence from the Italian Regional Elections’, Political Studies, 65:1, 144–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, Carolina (2022). ‘Voters’ Short-Term Responsiveness to Coalition Deals’, Party Politics, 28:5, 927–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, Carolina, and Julian Aichholzer (2017). ‘On the Nature of Voters’ Coalition Preferences’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27:3, 254–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, Carolina, Alejandro Ecker, and Thomas M. Meyer (2022). ‘Do Party Supporters Accept Policy Compromises in Coalition Governments?’, European Journal of Political Research, 61:1, 214–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sened, Itai (1996). ‘A Model of Coalition Formation: Theory and Evidence’, The Journal of Politics, 58:2, 350–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane, Ignacio Lago, and André Blais (2011). ‘Winning and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Support’, Social Science Quarterly, 92:3, 695–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Heike Klüver (2017). ‘Does Anybody Notice? How Policy Positions of Coalition Parties Are Perceived by Voters’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:1, 115–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, Kaare (1990). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert (2011). ‘Citizens’ Evaluations of the Fulfillment of Election Pledges: Evidence from Ireland’, The Journal of Politics, 73:1, 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, Joaquín Artés, Rory Costello, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Mark Ferguson, Petia Kostadinova, Catherine Moury, François Pétry, and Katrin Praprotnik (2017). ‘The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:3, 527–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thürk, Maria, Johan Hellström, and Holger Döring (2021). ‘Institutional Constraints on Cabinet Formation: Veto Points and Party System Dynamics’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:2, 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V. (1996). ‘Coalition Government Membership in West European Parliamentary Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 26:4, 471–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V., and James N. Druckman (2006). ‘The Portfolio Allocation Paradox: An Investigation into the Nature of a Very Strong but Puzzling Relationship’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:4, 635–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welz, Robert (2023). ‘At Least Agree on the Important Things: The Impact of Issue Distance, Intra Coalition Heterogeneity, and Salience on Voters’ Coalition Preferences’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 64:1, 19–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, Annika (2019). ‘Voters’ Preferences for Party Representation: Promise-Keeping, Responsiveness to Public Opinion or Enacting the Common Good’, International Political Science Review, 40:4, 486–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar