1,151
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Explaining the educational gradient in trust in politicians: a video-vignette survey experiment

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aaldering, Loes. (2017). ‘Political Representation and Educational Attainment: Evidence from The Netherlands (1994–2010)’, Political Studies, 65:1_suppl, 4–23.
  • Achterberg, Peter, and Dick Houtman (2009). ‘Ideologically Illogical? Why Do the Lower-Educated Dutch Display so Little Value Coherence?’, Social Forces, 87:3, 1649–70.
  • Agger, Robert E., Marshall N. Goldstein, and Stanley A. Pearl (1961). ‘Political Cynicism: Measurement and Meaning’, The Journal of Politics, 23:3, 477–506.
  • Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove (2014). ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:9, 1324–53.
  • Alferes, Valentim R. (2012). Methods of Randomization in Experimental Design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Allen, Nicholas, and Katja Sarmiento-Mirwaldt (2015). ‘“In It Together”? The Political Consequences of Perceived Discommunions of Interest in British Politics’, Research & Politics, 2:2, 205316801558756.
  • Arnesen, Sveinung, and Yvette Peters (2018). ‘The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:7, 868–99.
  • Aronow, Peter M., Jonathan Baron, and Lauren Pinson (2019). ‘A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check’, Political Analysis, 27:4, 572–89.
  • Auspurg, Katrin, and Thomas Hinz (2015). Factorial Survey Experiments. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Bakker, Bert N., Gijs Schumacher, and Matthijs Rooduijn (2021a). ‘Hot Politics? Affective Responses to Political Rhetoric’, American Political Science Review, 115:1, 150–64.
  • Bakker, Ryan, Seth Jolly, and Jonathan Polk (2021b). ‘Multidimensional Incongruence, Political Disaffection, and Support for Anti-Establishment Parties’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:2, 292–309.
  • Beauvallet-Haddad, Willy, Sébastien Michon, Victor Lepaux, and Céline Monicolle (2016). ‘The Changing Composition of the European Parliament: MEPs from 1979 to 2014’, French Politics, 14:1, 101–25.
  • Bos, Linda, Wouter van der Brug, and Claes H. de Vreese (2013). ‘An Experimental Test of the Impact of Style and Rhetoric on the Perception of Right-Wing Populist and Mainstream Party Leaders’, Acta Politica, 48:2, 192–208.
  • Bovens, Mark, and Anchrit Wille (2017). Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bovens, Mark, and Anchrit Wille (2021). ‘Education, Inequality, and Political Behavior’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1772
  • Bovens, Mark, Paul Dekker, and Will Tiemeijer (2014). Gescheiden werelden? Een verkenning van sociaal-culturele tegenstellingen in Nederland. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
  • Campbell, Rosie, and Philip Cowley (2014). ‘Rich Man, Poor Man, Politician Man: Wealth Effects in a Candidate Biography Survey Experiment’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16:1, 56–74.
  • Canovan, Margaret. (2004). ‘Populism for Political Theorists?’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9:3, 241–52.
  • Carnes, Nicholas. (2012). ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37:1, 5–34.
  • Carnes, Nicholas, and Noam Lupu (2016). ‘Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class’, American Political Science Review, 110:4, 832–44.
  • Citrin, Jack, and Laura Stoker (2018). ‘Political Trust in a Cynical Age’, Annual Review of Political Science, 21:1, 49–70.
  • Clifford, Scott, Geoffrey Sheagley, and Spencer Piston (2021). ‘Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects: Repeated Measures Designs in Survey Experiments’, American Political Science Review, 115:3, 1048–65.
  • Cramer, Katherine J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • De Vreese, Claes H., Frank Esser, Toril Aalberg, Carsten Reinemann, and James Stanyer (2018). ‘Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23:4, 423–38.
  • Dekker, Paul, Josje den Ridder, Pepijn van Houwelingen, and Emily Miltenburg (2020). Burgerperspectieven 2020 | 2. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  • Devine, Daniel, Jennifer Gaskell, Will Jennings, and Gerry Stoker (2020). Exploring Trust, Mistrust and Distrust. Southampton: University of Southampton.
  • Dinas, Elias. (2014). ‘Why Does the Apple Fall Far from the Tree? How Early Political Socialization Prompts Parent-Child Dissimilarity’, British Journal of Political Science, 44:4, 827–52.
  • Druckman, James N., Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski, and Arthur Lupia, eds. (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Elshout, Suzan. (2021a). Politics and Values: LISS Core Study Wave 13. Available at https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/1 (accessed 13 May 2022).
  • Elshout, Suzan. (2021b). Religion and Ethnicity: LISS Core Study Wave 14. Available at https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/1 (accessed 13 May 2022).
  • Elshout, Suzan. (2021c). Background Variables: LISS Panel. Available at https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/1 (accessed 19 January 2022).
  • Flanagan, Scott C., and Aie-rie Lee (2003). ‘The New Politics, Culture Wars and the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:3, 235–70.
  • Gaxie, Daniel, and Laurent Godmer (2008). ‘Cultural Capital and Political Selection: Educational Backgrounds of Parliamentarians’, in Maurizio Cotto and Heinrich Best (eds), Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 106–35.
  • Hadjar, Andreas, and Machael Beck (2010). ‘Who Does Not Participate in Elections in Europe and Why Is This?’, European Societies, 12:4, 521–42.
  • Hakhverdian, Armen, and Quinton Mayne (2012). ‘Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption: A Micro-Macro Interactive Approach’, The Journal of Politics, 74:3, 739–50.
  • Hameleers, Michael, Linda Bos, and Claes H. de Vreese (2017). ‘“They Did It”: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication’, Communication Research, 44:6, 870–900.
  • Hameleers, Michael, Linda Bos, and Claes H. de Vreese (2018). ‘Framing Blame: Toward a Better Understanding of the Effects of Populist Communication on Populist Party Preferences’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28:3, 380–98.
  • Harteveld, Eelco. (2020). ‘Hoe Nederlanders denken over hun politieke tegenpolen’, Stuk Rood Vlees, available at https://stukroodvlees.nl/hoe-nederlanders-denken-over-hun-politieke-tegenpolen/ (accessed 12 May 2023).
  • Heath, Oliver. (2015). ‘Policy Representation, Social Representation and Class Voting in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science, 45:1, 173–93.
  • Hetherington, Marc J. (1998). ‘The Political Relevance of Political Trust’, American Political Science Review, 92:4, 791–808.
  • Inglehart, Ronald. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Jackson, Robert A. (1995). ‘Clarifying the Relationship between Education and Turnout’, American Politics Quarterly, 23:3, 279–99.
  • Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave (2007). ‘Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:3, 319–45.
  • Kam, Cindy D., and Marc J. Trussler (2017). ‘At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research: Theory, Specification, and Analysis of Experiments with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects’, Political Behavior, 39:4, 789–815.
  • Kasperson, Roger E., Dominic Golding, and Seth Tuler (1992). ‘Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks’, Journal of Social Issues, 48:4, 161–87.
  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2006). ‘Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:6, 921–56.
  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lamont, Michèle. (2018). ‘Addressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality’, American Sociological Review, 83:3, 419–44.
  • Laurison, Daniel. (2015). ‘The Willingness to State an Opinion: Inequality, Don’t Know Responses, and Political Participation’, Sociological Forum, 30:4, 925–48.
  • Levi, Margaret, and Laura Stoker (2000). ‘Political Trust and Trustworthiness’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3:1, 475–507.
  • Lin, Winston. (2013). ‘Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freedman’s Critique’, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 7:1, 295–318.
  • Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 3rd ed. College Station: Stata Press.
  • Manning, Nathan, and Mary Holmes (2013). ‘‘‘He’s Snooty ‘Im”: Exploring “White Working Class” Political Disengagement’, Citizenship Studies, 17:3–4, 479–90.
  • Mansbridge, Jane. (2015). ‘Should Workers Represent Workers?’, Swiss Political Science Review, 21:2, 261–70.
  • Marien, Sofie. (2011). ‘The Effect of Electoral Outcomes on Political Trust: A Multi–Level Analysis of 23 Countries’, Electoral Studies, 30:4, 712–26.
  • Marx, Paul, and Christoph Nguyen (2018). ‘Anti-Elite Parties and Political Inequality: How Challenges to the Political Mainstream Reduce Income Gaps in Internal Efficacy’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 919–40.
  • Mayne, Quinton, and Armen Hakhverdian (2017). ‘Ideological Congruence and Citizens Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 50:6, 822–49.
  • McDonald, Jared. (2021). ‘Who Cares? Explaining Perceptions of Compassion in Candidates for Office’, Political Behavior, 43:4, 1371–94.
  • Miller, Arthur H. (1974). ‘Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970’, American Political Science Review, 68:3, 951–72.
  • Montgomery, Jacob M., Brendan Nyhan, and Michelle Torres (2018). ‘How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It’, American Journal of Political Science, 62:3, 760–75.
  • Mora, Cristina, Julie A. Dowling, and Michael Rodríguez-Muñiz (2021). ‘‘‘Mostly Rich White Men, Nothing in Common”: Latino Views on Political (under) Representation in the Trump Era’, American Behavioral Scientist, 65:9, 1180–92.
  • Mudde, Cas. (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
  • Mutz, Diana C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Mutz, Diana C. (2018). ‘Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115:19, E4330–E4339.
  • Noordzij, Kjell, Jeroen van der Waal, and Willem de Koster (2019). ‘The Educational Gradient in Trust in Politicians in The Netherlands: A Status-Based Cultural Conflict’, The Sociological Quarterly, 60:3, 439–56.
  • Noordzij, Kjell, Willem de Koster, and Jeroen van der Waal (2021a). ‘‘‘They Don’t Know What It’s like to Be at the Bottom”: Exploring the Role of Perceived Cultural Distance in Less-Educated Citizens’ Discontent with Politicians’, The British Journal of Sociology, 72:3, 566–79.
  • Noordzij, Kjell, Willem de Koster, and Jeroen van der Waal (2021b). ‘The Micro–Macro Interactive Approach to Political Trust: Quality of Representation and Substantive Representation across Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:4, 954–74.
  • Noordzij, Kjell, Willem de Koster, and Jeroen van der Waal (2021c). ‘A Revolt of the Deplored? The Role of Perceived Cultural Distance in the Educational Gradient in anti-Establishment Politics’, The British Journal of Sociology, 72:5, 1448–63.
  • O’Grady, Tom. (2019). ‘Careerists versus Coal-Miners: Welfare Reforms and the Substantive Representation of Social Groups in the British Labour Party’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:4, 544–78.
  • Pitkin, Hanna F. (1969). The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Roose, Henk, Koen van Eijck, and John Lievens (2012). ‘Culture of Distinction or Culture of Openness? Using a Social Space Approach to Analyze the Social Structuring of Lifestyles’, Poetics, 40:6, 491–513.
  • Schakel, Wouter, and Armen Hakhverdian (2018). ‘Ideological Congruence and Socio-Economic Inequality’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 441–65.
  • Scherpenzeel, Annette. (2009). Start of the LISS Panel: Sample and Recruitment of a Probability-Based Internet Panel. Tilburg: Centerdata.
  • Schwarz, Susanne, and Alexander Coppock (2022). ‘What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of Sixty-Seven Factorial Survey Experiments’, The Journal of Politics, 84:2, 655–68.
  • Sorek, Ayala Yarkoney, Kathryn Haglin, and Nehemia Geva (2018). ‘In Capable Hands: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Competence and Consistency on Leadership Approval’, Political Behavior, 40:3, 659–79.
  • Spruyt, Bram, Gil Keppens, and Filip van Droogenbroeck (2016). ‘Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?’, Political Research Quarterly, 69:2, 335–46.
  • Spruyt, Bram, Toon Kuppens, Russell Spears, and Jochem van Noord (2020). ‘Talking Politics? Educational Category Salience Reinforces Differences in People’s Willingness to Participate in Deliberative Initiatives’, Political Psychology, 41:3, 461–78.
  • Stecker, Christian, and Markus Tausendpfund (2016). ‘Multidimensional Government-Citizen Congruence and Satisfaction with Democracy’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:3, 492–511.
  • Stubager, Rune. (2010). ‘The Development of the Education Cleavage: Denmark as a Critical Case’, West European Politics, 33:3, 505–33.
  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer (2019). ‘Policy and Blame Attribution: Citizens’ Preferences, Policy Reputations, and Policy Surprises’, Political Behavior, 41:1, 53–77.
  • Taggart, Paul. (2004). ‘Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9:3, 269–88.
  • van den Hoogen, Elske, Stijn Daenekindt, Willem de Koster, and Jeroen van der Waal (2022). ‘Support for European Union Membership Comes in Various Guises: Evidence from a Correlational Class Analysis of Novel Dutch Survey Data’, European Union Politics, 23:3, 489–508.
  • van der Meer, Tom. (2010). ‘In What We Trust? A Multi-Level Study into Trust in Parliament as an Evaluation of State Characteristics’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76:3, 517–36.
  • van der Waal, Jeroen, and Willem de Koster (2015). ‘Why Do the Less Educated Oppose Trade Openness? A Test of Three Explanations in The Netherlands’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2:3–4, 313–44.
  • van der Waal, Jeroen, Peter Achterberg, and Dick Houtman (2007). ‘Class is Not Dead—It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990)’, Politics & Society, 35:3, 403–26.
  • van Deth, Jan W. (2020). ‘Non-Electoral Participation’, in Robert Rohrschneider and Jacques Thomassen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 470–508.
  • van Elsas, Erika. (2015). ‘Political Trust as a Rational Attitude: A Comparison of the Nature of Political Trust across Different Levels of Education’, Political Studies, 63:5, 1158–78.
  • Visser, Vivian, Willem de Koster, and Jeroen van der Waal (2023). ‘Understanding Less-Educated Citizens’ (Non-)Participation in Citizens’ Initiatives: Feelings of Entitlement and a Taste for Politics’, Current Sociology, 71:5, 924–42.
  • Williams, Joan C. (2017). White Working Class: Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Wirz, Dominique. (2018). ‘Persuasion through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication’, International Journal of Communication, 12, 1114–38.
  • Wittenberg, Chloe, Ben M. Tappin, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand (2021). ‘The (Minimal) Persuasive Advantage of Political Video over Text’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118:47, e2114388118.
  • Wüest, Reto, and Jonas Pontusson (2017). ‘Do Citizens Prefer Affluent Representatives? Evidence From a Survey Experiment in Switzerland’, Unpublished manuscript.