Quiet unity: salience, politicisation and togetherness in the EU’s Brexit negotiating position

References

• Biermann, Felix, and Stefan Jagdhuber (2022). ‘Take It and Leave It! A Postfunctionalist Bargaining Approach to the Brexit Negotiations’, West European Politics, 45:4, 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijsmans, Patrick, Charlotte Galpin, and Benjamin Leruth (2018). ‘“Brexit” in Transnational Perspective: An Analysis of Newspapers in France, Germany and The Netherlands’, Comparative European Politics, 16:5, 825–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojár, Abel, Anna Kyriazi, Ioana E. Oana, and Zbigniew Truchlewski (2023). ‘A Novel Method for Studying Policymaking: Policy Process Analysis (PPA) Applied to the Refugee Crisis’, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSC, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Chopin, Thierry, and Christian Lequesne (2021). ‘Disintegration Reversed: Brexit and the Cohesiveness of the EU-27’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 29:3, 419–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter, and Christopher Lord (2016). ‘Assessing Actually Existing Trajectories of EU Politicisation’, West European Politics, 39:1, 145–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter, Anna Leupold, and Henning Schmidtke (2016). ‘Introduction: The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance’, West European Politics, 39:1, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Die Welt (2016a). ‘Warum Gabriel und Tsipras jetzt ziemlich beste Freunde sind’, 30 June, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Die Welt (2016b). ‘AfD fordert mehr direkte Demokratie und gibt Merkel Schuld an Brexit’, 24 June, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Die Welt (2016c). ‘Deutsche Autobranche will das "norwegische Modell’, 5 July, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Die Welt (2017). ‘Banken-Umzug; "Es reicht nicht aus, einen Briefkasten anzusc­hrauben’, 31 January, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Die Welt (2019). ‘Brexit-Krise; Johnson schiebt Merkel den Schwarzen Peter zu’, 9 October, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, Tim., Alex Stojanovic, and Lewis Lloyd (2018). Negotiating Brexit: the Views of the EU-27: Our Brexit Work. Available online at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/IfG_views-eu-27-v5_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• El País (2018). ‘Sánchez amenaza con votar contra del acuerdo del Brexit por Gibraltar’, November 21.
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2016). ‘Poland urges ‘new EU treaty’, based on nation states’, 24 June.
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2019). ‘Farage to Lobby EU Countries in Search of Brexit Extension Veto’, 14 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2017). ‘Special Meeting of the European Council (Art. 50) – Guidelines’, EUCOXT20004/17, Brussels, April 29.
   Google Scholar
• Factiva (2023). Online Newspaper Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Figaro (2016). ‘Guaino: «Attention à ne pas confondre Brexit et Frexit: la différence s'appelle l'euro…»’, 26 June, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Figaro (2019). ‘Les puissances du G7 en ordre dispersé’, 24 August, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2016a). ‘Eastern Europeans Bemoan Brexit and Shun Closer EU Integration’, June 30, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2016b). ‘European Leaders Seek to Bolster Economy; Naples Summit’, 22 August, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2017a). ‘Theresa May Seeks Poland’s Support for Brexit Deal’, March 23, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2017b). ‘May Warns EU27 against Pushing Her Too Far’, 20 October, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2018). ‘May Kicks Brexit Vote to New Year as Threat Escalates of Tory Mutiny’, 12 December, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2019). ‘France Digs in Heels as EU Weighs Brexit Extension’, 26 October, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Frennhoff Larsén, Magdalena, and Sangeeta Khorana (2020). ‘Negotiating Brexit: A Clash of Approaches’, Comparative European Politics, 18:5, 858–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, Matteo (2017). ‘Art. 50 TEU: A Well-Designed Secession Clause’, European Papers, 2:1, 159–81.
   Google Scholar
• Greubel, Johannes (2019). ‘The EU’s Governance System of Brexit and Its Impact on the Negotiations’, Policy Brief, European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon (2018). ‘Brexit: Where is the EU-UK Relationship Heading?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:S1, 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2019). European Party Politics in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Independent (2016). ‘Brexit: Article 50 Was Never Actually Meant to Be Used, Says Its Author’, 26 July.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Mads Dagnis, and Jesper Dahl Kelstrup (2019). ‘House United, House Divided: Explaining the EU’s Unity in the Brexit Negotiations’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57:S1, 28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, Jean-Claude (2016). ‘Speech by President Jean-Claude Juncker at the Annual General Meeting of the Hellenic Federation of Enterprises (SEV) ’, 21 June. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_16_2293.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein, and Simon Usherwood, eds. (2018). Negotiating Brexit: What Do the UK’s Negotiating Partners Want? London: UK in a Changing Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, Samuel (1997). Going Public. New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, eds. (2019). Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Swen Hutter, eds. (2019). Restructuring European Party Politics in Times of Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Argyrios Altiparmakis, Abel Bojar, and Ioana E. Oana (2021). ‘Debordering and Re-Bordering in the Refugee Crisis: A Case of “Defensive Integration”’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:3, 331–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Swen Hutter, and Abel Bojar (2019). ‘Contentious Episode Analysis’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24:3, 251–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, Brigid (2019). ‘How the EU-27 Came to Be’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57:S1, 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, Brigid, and Stefan Telle (2023). The EU's Response to Brexit: United and Effective. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martill, Benjamin, and Uta Staiger (2022). ‘Prisoners of the Own Device: Brexit as a Failed Negotiating Strategy’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24:4, 582–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perarnaud, Clément, and Javier Arregui (2023). ‘Still a “Spectator”? Capabilities of the Spanish REPER and Spain’s Influence in the Council of the EU’, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 61:1, 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politico (2016). ‘Brussels Power Struggle over Brexit Negotiations’, 28 June.
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, Ben (2016). ‘Brexit and the Problem of European Disintegration’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12:4, 864–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzeczpospolita (2016a). ‘Festiwal głupoty’, 4 July, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Rzeczpospolita (2016b). ‘Terlecki: Tusk do dymisji’, 7 July, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Rzeczpospolita (2017a). ‘Żadnego rozwodu nie będzie’, 3 March, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Rzeczpospolita (2017b). ‘Pierwszy spór w rokowaniach’, 31 March, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2018). ‘Brexit: Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:8, 1154–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2020). ‘Politicisation Management in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:3, 342–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuette, Leonard (2021). ‘Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:5, 1142–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, Paul, and Hans-Jörg Trenz (2015). ‘Understanding the Mechanisms of EU Politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone Crisis’, Comparative European Politics, 13:3, 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul, Kai Oppermann, Neil Dooley, Aleks Szczerbiak, and Susan Collard (2023). ‘Drivers of Consensus: Responses to Brexit in Germany, France, Ireland and Poland’, German Politics, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian (2017). ‘German Industry Warns UK Not to Expect Help in Brexit Negotiations’, 9 July.
   Google Scholar
• The Irish Times (2017). ‘British Pledges on Border “Hard to Reconcile’, Claim EU Negotiators’, 10 December, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• The Irish Times (2018a). ‘Key Brexit MP: “Astonishing’, No EU Relationship Negotiated, 26 January, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• The Irish Times (2018b). ‘Hardline Brexiteers Say They Will Not Back May’s Latest Brexit Motion’, 13 February, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• The Irish Times (2018c). ‘Sinn Féin Seeks Emergency Summit on Irish Brexit Issues’, 23 July, retrieved from Factiva.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, Stijn, Nicola Chelotti, Helen Drake, Juan Roch, and Patricia Rodi (2020). ‘Eager to Leave? Populist Radical Right Parties’ Responses to the UK’s Brexit Vote’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22:1, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Stefanie (2021). ‘EU-27 Public Opinion on Brexit’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:3, 569–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, Douglas (2019). ‘Trends in European Political (Dis)Integration: An Analysis of Postfunctionalist and Other Explanations’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1134–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Sarah, and Stella Ladi (2020). ‘European Union Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Adaptability in Times of Permanent Emergency’, Journal of European Integration, 42:8, 1025–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar