Turning assertive? EU rule of law enforcement in the aftermath of the war in Ukraine

References

• Anders, Lisa H., and S. Sonja Priebus (2021). ‘Does It Help to Call a Spade a Spade? Examining the Legal Bases and Effects of Rule of Law-Related Infringement Procedures against Hungary’, in Astrid Lorenz and Lisa H. Anders (eds.), Illiberal Trends and Anti-EU Politics in East Central Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 235–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bárd, Petra, and Dimitry Kochenov (2022). ‘War as a Pretext to Wave the Rule of Law Goodbye? The Case for an EU Constitutional Awakening’, European Law Journal, 27:1-3, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárd, Petra, and Viktor Zoltán Kazai (2022). ‘Enforcement of a Formal Conception of the Rule of Law as a Potential Way Forward to Address Backsliding: Hungary as a Case Study’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14:2-3, 165–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek (2022). ‘Process Tracing Methods in the Social Sciences’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.176
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, Joachim, and Markus Haverland (2014). ‘Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing’, in Isabelle Engeli and Christine Rothmayr Allison (eds.), Comparative Policy Studies. Research Methods Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Boese, Vanessa A., et al. (2022). ‘Democracy Report 2022 Autocratization Changing Nature?’, V-DEM.
   Google Scholar
• Closa, Carlos (2019). ‘The Politics of Guarding the Treaties: Commission Scrutiny of Rule of Law Compliance’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:5, 696–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closa, Carlos, and Dimitry Kochenov (2016). Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, David (2011). ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 44:4, 823–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, Ramona (2022). The Politics of the Rule of Law in the EU Polity: Actors, Tools and Challenges. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, Colin, and Diana Kapiszewski (2014). ‘Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 47:01, 43–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014). ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council a New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law’, COM/2014/0158 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2021). ‘Rule of Law: Parliament Prepares to Sue Commission for Failure to Act’, Press Release, 10-06-2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2022). ‘Rule of Law Conditionality: Commission Must Immediately Initiate Proceedings’, Press Release, 10-03-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, Gerda (2001). ‘The EU14’s “Sanctions” against Austria: Sense and Nonsense’, ECSA Review, 14:1, 14–5.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex (2022). ‘5.3 Million Ukrainians Have Entered EU Since The Beginning of The Invasion’, Frontex News 02-06-2022, available at https://www.frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/news-release/5-3-million-ukrainians-have-entered-eu-since-the-beginning-of-invasion-HbXkUz.
   Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, Dorothee (2005). ‘The Institution of ‘Consensus’ in the European Union: Formal versus Informal Decision-Making in the Council’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:1, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, Lise E., Julian Hoerner, and Joseph Lacey (2021). ‘Why Does the European Right Accommodate Backsliding States? An Analysis of 24 European People’s Party Votes (2011–2019)’, European Political Science Review, 13:2, 169–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, Gisela (2022). ‘European Commission Launches Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism against the Hungarian Government’, UKICES, Commentary, 18 April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Alisha C. (2016). ‘Forbearance’, American Political Science Review, 110:2, 232–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, Jon, and Tora Skodvin (2008). ‘Which Way to U.S. Climate Cooperation? Issue Linkage versus a U.S.-Based Agreement’, Review of Policy Research, 25:2, 129–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraczewski, Jakub (2022). ‘Unexpected Complications: The Impact of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on the Rule of Law Crisis in the EU: An Anti-Rule of Law Alliance’, VerfBlog, 23 December 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2017). ‘Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarian­ism in Europe’s Democratic Union’, Government and Opposition, 52:2, 211–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2020). ‘The European Union’s Authoritarian Equilibrium’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:3, 481–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel (2022). ‘Appeasement, Ad Infinitum’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29:2, 177–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Tommaso Pavone (2023). ‘Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union’, World Politics, 75:4, 779–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. (2014). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. London: Pearson New International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kochenov, Dimitry (2019). ‘Elephants in the Room: The European Commission’s 2019 Communication on the Rule of Law’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11:2-3, 423–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, Dean, and Emerson M. S. Niou (2004). ‘A Theory of Economic Sanctions and Issue Linkage: The Roles of Preferences, Information, and Threats’, The Journal of Politics, 66:1, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, Heather E. (2010). ‘Issue Characteristics, Issue Linkage, and States’ Choice of Bargaining Strategies in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:5, 694–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (1993). ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31:4, 473–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papada, Evie, et al. (2023). ‘Democracy Report 2023 Defiance in the Face of Autocratization’, V-DEM.
   Google Scholar
• Pavone, Tomasso, and Øyvind Stiansen (2022). ‘The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform’, American Political Science Review, 116:1, 322–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pech, Laurent (2019). ‘From “Nuclear Option” to Damp Squib?’, Verfassungsblog, 13 November 2019, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/from-nuclear-option-to-damp-squib/.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, Laurent (2020). ‘Article 7 TEU: From “Nuclear Option” to “Sisyphean Procedure”?’, in Uladzislau Belavusau and Aleksandra Gliszczyńska Grabias (eds.), Constitutionalism under Stress: Essays in Honour of Wojciech Sadurski. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, Laurent (2022). ‘No More Excuses’, VerfBlog, 16 February 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, Laurent, and Kim Lane Scheppele (2017). ‘Illiberalism within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47.
   Google Scholar
• Platon, Sébastien (2021). ‘Bringing a Knife to a Gunfight: The European Parliament, the Rule of Law Conditionality, and the Action for Failure to Act’, VerfBlog, 11 June 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Priebus, Sébastien (2022). ‘Watering down the ‘Nuclear Option’? The Council and the Article 7 Dilemma’, Journal of European Integration, 44:7, 995–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röben, Volker (2010). ‘The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Jochen von Bernstorff, Philipp Dann, and Matthias Goldmann (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions. Berlin: Springer, 819–42.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane (2016). ‘Enforcing the Basic Principles of EU Law through Systemic Infringement Actions’, in Carlos Closa and Dimitry Kochenov (eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane, Dimitry Kochenov, and Barbara Grabowska-Moroz (2020a). ‘EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values Through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union’, Yearbook of European Law 38:3–121.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane, Pech Laurent, and Platon Sébastien (2020b). ‘Compromising the Rule of Law While Compromising on the Rule of Law’, VerfBlog, 13 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2018). ‘European Integration (Theory) in Times of Crisis: A Comparison of the Euro and Schengen Crises’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:7, 969–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlipphak, Bernd, and Oliver Treib (2017). ‘Playing the Blame Game on Brussels: The Domestic Political Effects of EU Interventions against Democratic Backsliding’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:3, 352–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, Jason, and David Collier (2010). ‘Glossary’, in Henry E. Brady and David Collier (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Uitz, Renáta (2019). ‘The Perils of Defending the Rule of Law through Dialogue’, European Constitutional Law Review, 15:1, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR (2022). ‘Ukraine Refugee Situation’, available at https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine/location?secret=unhcrrestricted.
   Google Scholar
• Vaagland, Karin (2021). ‘Crisis-Induced Leadership: Exploring the Role of the EU Commission in the EU–Jordan Compact’, Politics and Governance, 9:3, 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar