Withering the exogenous shock: EU policy responses to the Russian war against Ukraine

References

• Andoura, Sami (2013). ‘Energy Solidarity in Europe: From Independence to Interdependence’. Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute, Studies & Reports, July, available at https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/energysolidarity-andoura-ne-ijd-july13-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anghel, Veronica, and Erik Jones (2023). ‘Is Europe Really Forged through Crisis? Pandemic EU and the Russia – Ukraine War’, Journal of European Public Policy, 30:4, 766–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Julian, and Patrick Müller (2021). ‘Failing Forward in the EU's Common Security and Defense Policy: The Integration of EU Crisis Management’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:10, 1669–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenau, Jack, and Benjamin Lauderdale (2018). ‘Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: Agenda Setting and Legislative Voting in Response to the EU Crisis’, The Journal of Politics, 80:2, 462–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosilca, Ruxandra-Laura (2021). ‘The Refugee Crisis and the EU Border Security Policies’ in Marianne Riddervold’, in Marianne Riddervold, Jarle Trondal, and Akasemi Newsome (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 469–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, Alexandra (2021). ‘LEAK: What the EU’s Future Military Strategy Could Look Like’, EURACTIVE.com, 10 November (updated: 11. Nov.).
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Martin B., and Vivien A. Schmidt (2018). ‘Power and Changing Modes of Governance in the Euro Crisis’, Governance, 31:4, 609–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celi, Giuseppe, Dario Guarascio, Jelena Reljic, Annamaria Simonazzi, and Francesco Zezza (2022). ‘The Asymmetric Impact of War: Resilience, Vulnerability and Implications for EU Policy’, Intereconomics, 57:3, 141–7.
   Google Scholar
• Checherita-Westphal, Cristina, Maximilian Freier, and Philip Muggenthaler (2022). ‘Euro Area Fiscal Policy Response to the War in Ukraine and Its Macroeconomic Impact (Box 7)’, ECB Economic Bulletin: Issue 5/2022, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michel, James March, and Johan Olsen (1972). ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17:1, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2001). ‘Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on Minimum Standards for Giving Temporary Protection in the Event of a Mass Influx of Displaced Persons and on Measures Promoting a Balance of Efforts between Member States in Receiving Such Persons and Bearing the Consequences Thereof’, Official Journal, L 212:7, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2015). ‘Council Decision Establishing Provisional Measures in the Area of International Protection for the Benefit of Italy and Greece’, Official Journal, L 248:24, 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2017). ‘Council Decision Establishing Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and Determining the List of Participating Member States’, Official Journal, L 331(CFSP) 2017/2315, 14 December, 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2021). ‘Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 of 22 March 2021 Establishing a European Peace Facility, and Repealing Decision (CFSP) 2015/528’, Official Journal, L 102:24, 14–62.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2022a). ‘Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 of 4 March 2022 Establishing the Existence of a Mass Influx of Displaced Persons from Ukraine within the Meaning of Article 5 of Directive 2001/55/EC, and Having the Effect of Introducing Temporary Protection’, Official Journal, L 71:4, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2022b). ‘Extraordinary Justice and Home Affairs Council: Main Results’, 27 February.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2018). ‘Council Impementing Decision (EU) 2018/1993 of 11 December 2018 on the EU Integrated Political Crisis Response Arrangements’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 320:11, 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2022). ‘Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1369 on Coordinated Demand-Reduction Measures for Gas’, Official Journal, L 206:5, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union (2017). ‘Judgment in Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15, Slovakia and Hungary v Council’, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Luxembourg: 6 September.
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, Bruno (2021). ‘The European Union’s COVID-19 Recovery Plan: The Legal Engineering of an Economic Policy Shift’, Common Market Law Review, 58:3, 635–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mauro, Danilo, and Vincenzo Memoli (2021). ‘The Role of Public Opinion in EU Integration: Assessing the Relationship between Elites and the Public during the Refugee Crisis’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:5, 1303–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euro Summit (2022). ‘Statement of the Euro Summit, Meeting in Inclusive Format’, Euro Summit Meeting (24 June 2022), Brussels, 24 June: Euro 502/22.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015). ‘A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM/2015/080 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017). ‘Thirteenth Report on Relocation and Resettlesment’, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council, COM (2017):333, 13 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019). ‘The European Green Deal’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2019):640 final: 11 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020)‘New Pact on Migration and Asylum’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, COM/2020/609 final: 23 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021). ‘Fit for 55': delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, The European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of Regions and the European Investment Bank. COM (2021):550 final: 14 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022a). ‘Fiscal Policy Guidance for 2023’, Communication from the Commission to the Council, COM (2022):85 final: 2 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022b). ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/241 as Regards REPowerEU Chapters in Recovery and Resilience Plans and Pmending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060, Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/1814'. Vol’, COM, (2022):231 final: 18 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022c). ‘Report on Migration and Asylum’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, COM (2021):590 final: 29 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022d). ‘REPowerEU Plan’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2022):230 final: 18 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy (2022). ‘Joint Communication on the Defence Investment Gaps Analysis and Way Forward’, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2022:24 final: 18 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2020). ‘Special Meeting of the European Council (17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 July 2020) – Conclusions’, Brussels, 21 July EUCO 10/20.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2022a). ‘Special Meeting of the European Council (30 and 31 May 2022)’, Conclusions, EUCO 21, 31 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2022b). ‘A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence: For a European Union That Protects Its Citizens, Values and Interests and Contributes to International Peace and Security’, Annex to the Council Conclusions, 7371/22, 21 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2022c). ‘Versailles Declaration’, Informal Meeting of the Heads of State or Government, 10–1. March, Versailles: 11 March.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service (2023). ‘Annual Progress Report on the Implementation of the Strategic Compass for Security and Defence’, Report of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the Council, 20 March.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU (2022a). ‘Regulation (EU) 2022/562 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 Amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 223/2014 as Regards Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe (CARE)’, Official Journal, L 109, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU (2022b). ‘Regulation (EU) 2022/585 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 Amending Regulations (EU) No 514/2014 Laying down General Provisions on the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and on the Instrument for Financial Support for Police Cooperation, Preventing and Combating Crime, and Crisis Management, (EU) No 516/2014 Establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and (EU) 2021/1147 Establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund’, Official Journal, L 112, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU (2022c). ‘Regulation (EU) 2022/1032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2022 Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1938 and (EC) No 715/2009 with Regard to Gas Storage (Text with EEA Relevance)’, Official Journal, L 173, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Research Service and Anja Radjenovic (2020). ‘Reforming Asylum and Migration Management’, BRIEFING: EU Legislation in Progress, PE 659. 316 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Union and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2022). ‘Seventh Progress Report on the Implementation of the common set of Proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017'.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Sergio, and Vivien A. Schmidt (2019). ‘Introduction: Differentiation and Beyond’, Comparative European Politics, 17:2, 173–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, Rosa Maria (2018). ‘Conflicting Energy Policy Priorities in EU Energy Governance’, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8:3, 239–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2022). ‘Crisis Pressures and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:9, 1351–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Waltraud Schelkle (2023). ‘Maintaining the EU’s Compound Polity during the Long Crisis Decade’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2165698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiott, Daniel (2023). ‘In Every Crisis an Opportunity? European Union Integration in Defence and the War on Ukraine’, Journal of European Integration, 45:3, 447–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French Presidency of the Council of the European Union (2021). ‘Recovery, Strength and a Sense of Belonging’, Programme for the French Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• French Presidency of the Council of the European Union (2022). ‘First Step in the Gradual Implementation of the European Pact on Migration and Asylum: Modus Operandi of a Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism’, 22 June 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, Philipp (2022). ‘Bellicist Integration? The War in Ukraine, the European Union and Core State Powers’, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:12, 1885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Brigid Laffan, and Gary Marks (2018). ‘Introduction to Theory Meets Crisis Collection’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:1, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2019). ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Erik (2022). ‘The War in Ukraine and the European Central Bank’, Survival, 64:4, 111–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, Nicole (2022). ‘Putin’s War and the Strategic Compass: A Quantum Leap for the EU’s Security and Defence Policy?’, Hertie School – Jacques Delors Centre, Policy Brief: 29 April.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Theresa, and Francesco Nicoli (2020). ‘Collective Identities and the Integration of Core State Powers: Introduction to the Special Issue’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58:1, 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino-Sandberg, Päivi, and Matthias Ruffert (2022). ‘Next Generation EU and Its Constitutional Ramifications: A Critical Assessment’, Common Market Law Review, 59:2, 433–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, Dennis, and Christiane Eilders (2018). ‘Lost in Uncertainty: How the Euro Crisis Affected European Identity Constructions in National Media Discourses’, International Communication Gazette, 81:6–8, 602–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Beltz Print on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Moise, Alexandru, James Dennison, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2023). ‘European Attitudes to Refugees after the Russian Invasion of Ukraine’, West European Politics, 47:2, 356–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moland, Martin (2022). ‘Constraining Dissensus and Permissive Consensus: Variations in Support for Core State Powers’, West European Politics, 46:6, 1133–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, Arnout (2021). ‘Unlocking European Defence. In Search of the Long Overdue Paradigm Shift’, IAI Papers, 21, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Thu, and Nils Redeker (2022). ‘How to Make the Marriage Work: Wedding the Recovery and Resilience Facility and European Semester’, Hertie School - Jacques Delors Centre, Policy Brief: 31 January.
   Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2022). ‘Finland and Sweden Complete NATO Accession Talks’, Newsroom: 4 July. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_197737.htm (accessed 30 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, Jean (2022). ‘The Economic Policy Consequences of the War’, Bruegel Blog, 8 March.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, Jean, and Olivier Blanchard (2022). ‘Fiscal Support and Monetary Vigilance: Economic Policy Implications of the Russia-Ukraine War for the European Union’, Policy Contribution, 06/2022: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Redeker, Nils (2022). ‘Wielding the Big Gun: What the ECB’s New Bond Purchasing Program Means for EU Governance’, Hertie School – Jacques Delors Centre, Policy Brief, 02 August.
   Google Scholar
• Redeker, Nils, and Philipp Jäger (2022). ‘New Needs, New Prices, Same Money – Why the EU Must Raise Its Game to Combat the War’s Economic Fallout’, Hertie School – Jacques Delors Centre, Policy Brief, 6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Renkin, Jennifer (2020). ‘EU Court Rules Three Member States Broke Law over Refugee Quotas: Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland Failed to Comply with 2015 Programme, ECJ Says’, The Guardian, 2 April.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, Marianne, Jarle Trondal, and Akasemi Newsome, eds. (2021). The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Aandré (2022). ‘Does the war in Ukraine call for a new Next Generation EU?’, Bruegel blog: 17 May. https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/does-war-ukraine-call-new-next-generation-eu. (accessed 30 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, Sabine, and Fabien Terpan (2016). ‘Do Crises Lead to Policy Change? The Multiple Streams Framework and the European Union’s Economic Governance Instruments’, Policy Sciences, 49:1, 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz (2006). ‘The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44:4, 845–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelkle, Waltraud (2011). ‘Fiscal Integration by Default’, in Philipp Genschel and Markus Jachtenfuchs (eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State. Oxford: Oup, 105–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schilde, Kaija E., Stephanie B. Anderson, and Andrew D. Garner (2019). ‘A More Martial Europe? Public Opinion, Permissive Consensus, and EU Defence Policy’, European Security, 28:2, 153–72.
   Google Scholar
• Scipioni, Marco (2018). ‘Failing Forward in EU Migration Policy? EU Integration after the 2015 Asylum and Migration Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:9, 1357–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siklos, Pierre (2022). ‘Is This Time Different? War, Supply Constraints and the Resilience of Monetary Policy’, in European Parliament (ed.), Monetary Dialogue Papers – War in Ukraine: Implications for the ECB. Luxembourg: Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 59–89.
   Google Scholar
• Strauch, Rolf (2022). ‘Euronomics: The Current Terms of Trade Shock and the Loss of Wealth – Are We Heading Back to the 1970s?’, ESM Blog, 29 March.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen (1999). ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2:1, 369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauner, Florian (2016). ‘Asylum Policy: The EU’s ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure’, Journal of European Integration, 38:3, 311–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treib, Olivier (2014). ‘Implementing and Complying with EU Governance Outputs’, Living Rev. Euro. Gov, 9, 2014–1.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, and Xenophon Yataganas (2001). ‘Veto Players and Decision-Making in the EU After Nice: Policy Stability and Bureaucratic/Judicial Discretion’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:2, 283–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmaier, Wesley W., Mark Blyth, and Leonard Seabrooke (2007). ‘Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises’, International Studies Quarterly, 51:4, 747–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje, Tanja A. Börzel, and Thomas Risse, eds. (2020). European Integration Theory. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wyplosz, Charles (2022). ‘And Now, the Ukraine Shock’, in European Parliament (ed.), Monetary Dialogue Papers – War in Ukraine: Implications for the ECB. Luxembourg: Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, Natascha (2018). ‘States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non-Adoption of a Refugee Quota System’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:1, 44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, Jonathan, Francesco Nicoli, and Brigid Laffan (2019). ‘Introduction: The European Union beyond the Polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 963–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar