The short-lived hope for contagion: Brexit in social media communication of the populist right

References

• Albertazzi, Daniele (2009). ‘Reconciling “Voice and Exit”: Swiss and Italian Populists in Power’, Politics, 29:1, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri (2008). ‘Taming Extremist Parties: Lessons from Europe’, Journal of Democracy, 19:1, 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, Sebastian Adrian Popa, and Hermann Schmitt (2019). ‘Responding to the Crisis: Eurosceptic Parties of the Left and Right and Their Changing Position towards the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:3, 797–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopin, Thierry, Niccolò Fraccaroli, Nils Hernborg, and Jean-Francois Jamet (2019). ‘The Battle for Europe’s Future: Political Cleavages and the Balance of Power Ahead of the European Parliament Elections’, Policy Paper 237. Institute Jacques Delors.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Stephen D. (2017). ‘Europe’s United Future after Brexit: Brexit Has Not Killed the European Union, Rather It Has Eliminated the Largest Obstacle to EU Consolidation’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 29:3, 311–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt (2012). ‘When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 246–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wilde, Pieter, Ruud Koopmans, and Michael Zürn (2014). ‘The Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism: Representative Claims Analysis’, Discussion paper no. SP IV 2014-102. Berlin: WSV Berlin Social Science Centre.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilde, Pieter, Asimina Michailidou, and Hans-Jorg Trenz (2014). ‘Converging on Euroscepticism: Online Polity Contestation during European Parliament Elections’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:4, 766–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, and Johan Hellström (2016). ‘The Radical Right as Driving Force in the Electoral Arena?’, in Swen Hutter, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), Politicising Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 156–80.
   Google Scholar
• Euractiv (2016). ‘ECR chief backs Brexit’, March 11.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021). ‘Public Opinion in the European Union’, Standard Eurobarometer 94.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, Gerda, and George Plattner (2020). ‘EU Policies and Populist Radical Right Parties’ Programmatic Claims: Foreign Policy, Anti-Discrimination and the Single Market’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58:3, 723–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianfreda, Stella (2018). ‘Politization of the Refugee Crisis? A Content Analysis of Parliamentary Debates in Italy, the UK, and the EU’, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 48:1, 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Giani, Marco, and Pierre-Guillaume Méon (2021). ‘Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump’s Election’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:3, 1332–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, Reinhard, Duncan McDonnell, and Annika Werner (2021). ‘Equivocal Euroscepticism: How Populist Radical Right Parties Can Have Their EU Cake and Eat It’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:2, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara (2016). ‘The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, A Divided Continent’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:9, 1259–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, Sebastian Adrian Popa, Wouter van der Brug, and Hermann Schmitt (2021). ‘The Brexit Deterrent? How Member State Exit Shapes Public Support for the European Union’, European Union Politics, 23:1, 100–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, Dermot, and Uwe Puetter (2019). ‘The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism and Integration Theory in the post-Maastricht Period’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1153–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krastev, Ivan (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazi, Anna, Argyrios Altiparmakis, Joseph Ganderson, and Joan Miró (2023). ‘Quite Unity: Salience, Politicisation and Togetherness in the EU’s Brexit Negotiating Position’, West European Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2264717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, Brigid, and Stefan Telle (2023). The EU’s Response to Brexit: United and Effective. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch (1977). ‘The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data’, Biometrics, 33:1, 159–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, Kenneth (2019). Discourse Analysis and European Union Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malet, Giorgio (2021). Cross-National Social Influence: How Foreign Votes Can Affect Domestic Public Opinion. Zürich: University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Malet, Giorgio, and Stefanie Walter (2023). ‘Have Your Cake and Eat It, too? Switzerland and the Feasibility of Differentiated Integration after Brexit’, West European Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2192083
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, Duncan, and Annika Werner (2019). ‘Differently Eurosceptic: Radical Right Populist Parties and Their Supporters’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:12, 1761–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea L. P., Paul Taggart, and Stijn van Kessel (2018). ‘The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions’, Politics, 38:3, 378–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea L. P., and Stijn Van Kessel (2017). ‘United in Opposition? The Populist Radical Right’s EU-Pessimism in Times of Crisis’, Journal of European Integration, 39:4, 405–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2016). ‘Responding to Growing European Union-Skepticism? The Stances of Political Parties toward European Integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the Financial Crisis’, European Union Politics, 17:1, 138–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senninger, Roman, and Daniel Bischof (2018). ‘Working in Unison: Political Parties and Policy Issue Transfer in the Multilevel Space’, European Union Politics, 19:1, 140–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. (2001). ‘The Politics of Economic Adjustment in France and Britain: When Does Discourse Matter?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8:2, 247–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Paul Taggart (2008). ‘Theorizing Party-Based Euroscepticism: Problem of Definition, Measurement and Causality’, in Aleks Szczerbiak and Paul Taggart (eds.), Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism: Volume 2: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 238–62.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul, and Aleks Szczerbiak (2008). Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Volume 1: Case Studies and Country Surveys. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul, and Aleks Szczerbiak (2013). ‘Coming in from the Cold? Euroscepticism, Government Participation and Party Positions on Europe’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:1, 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul, and Aleks Szczerbiak (2018). ‘Putting Brexit into Perspective: The Effect of the Eurozone and Migration Crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European States’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:8, 1194–214.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, Oliver (2014). ‘The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:10, 1541–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treib, Olivier (2021). ‘Euroscepticism Is Here to Stay: What Cleavage Theory Can Teach Us about the 2019 European Parliament Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 28:2, 174–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, Stijn, Nicola Chelotti, Helen Drake, Juan Roch, and Patricia Rodi (2020). ‘Eager to Leave? Populist Radical Right Parties’ Responses to the UK’s Brexit Vote’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22:1, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, Sofia (2018). ‘The Radical Right and Euroskepticism’, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 122–40.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Stefanie (2021). ‘EU-27 Public Opinion on Brexit’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59:3, 569–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Stefanie, Elias Dinas, Igancio Jurado, and Nikitas Konstantinidis (2018). ‘Noncooperation by Popular Vote: Expectations, Foreign Intervention, and the Vote in the 2015 Greek Bailout Referendum’, International Organization, 72:4, 969–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, Richard, and Philip Lynch (2014). ‘Understanding the Formation and Actions of Eurosceptic Groups in the European Parliament: Pragmatism, Principles and Publicity’, Government and Opposition, 49:2, 232–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, Fabio, Roman Senninger, and Daniel Bischof (2020). ‘Party Policy Diffusion in the European Multilevel Space: What It Is, How It Works, and Why It Matters’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30:3, 339–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, Jonathan, Francesco Nicoli, and Brigid Laffan (2019). ‘Introduction: The European Union beyond the Polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 963–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar