Mission Command in the Information Age: A Normal Accidents Perspective on Networked Military Operations

Bibliography

• Alberts, David S. and Richard E. Hayes, Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age (Washington DC: CCRP Publication Series 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, David S. and Richard E. Hayes, Understanding Command and Control (Washington DC: CCRP Publication Series 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, David S., John J. Garstka, and Frederick P. Stein, Network Centric Warfare (Washington DC: CCRP Publication Series 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Carliss Y. and Kim B. Clark, ‘Managing in an Age of Modularity’, Harvard Business Review 75/5 (Oct. 1997), 84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, David J., ‘The more you know, the less you understand: The Problem with Information Warfare’, Journal of Strategic Studies 29/3 (Sept. 2006), 505–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, J.A. and E. Telford, ‘The Modular Army’, Military Review, March–April 2004, 21–7.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Bradford, Meyer Kestnbaum, and David R. Segal, ‘Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern?’, Armed Forces and Society 27/3 (Spring 2001), 319–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bungay, Stephen, ‘The Road to Mission Command: The Genesis of a Mission Command Philosophy’, British Army Review 137 (Summer 2005), 22–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bungay, Stephen, The Art of Action. How Leaders Close the Gaps between Plans, Actions, and Results (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Burken, Christine van, ‘The Non-neutrality of Technology’, Military Review 93/3 (2013), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Eliot A., ‘Change and Transformation in Military Affairs’, Journal of Strategic Studies 27/3 (Sept. 2004), 395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletta, Damon and Peter D. Feaver, ‘Civilian Monitoring of US Military Operations in the Information Age’, Armed Forces and Society 33/1 (Oct. 2006), 106–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creveld, Martin van, Command in War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 1985).
   Google Scholar
• De Waard, E., ‘Engaging Environmental Turbulence’, Doctoral thesis, Rotterdam: Erasmus Univ. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• De Waard, Erik and Eric-Hans Kramer, ‘Tailored Task Forces: Temporary Organizations and Modularity’, International Journal of Project Management 26/5 (July 2008), 537–46.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, Antullio J., After Clausewitz: German Military Thinkers before the Great War (Lawrence: Univ. of Kansas 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Sten Rynning, ‘NATO's Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/5 (Oct. 2010), 673–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasana, Kenton G., ‘Using Capabilities to Drive Military Transformation: An Alternative Framework’, Armed Forces and Society 37/1 (Jan. 2011), 141–62.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., J. Peters, K. Kitchens, A. Martin, J. Fischbach, A Review of the Army’s Modular Force Structure (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Leonhard, Robert R., The Principles of War for the Information Age (Novato, CA: Presidio 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, Douglas A., Breaking the Phalanx: A New Design for Landpower in the 21st Century (Westport, CT: Praeger 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, Douglas A., Transformation Under Fire – Revolutionizing How America Fights (Westport, CT: Praeger 2006).
   Google Scholar
• NATO, ‘NATO Network Enabled Capability C2 Maturity Model’, Research Report of The RTO Task Group SAS-065, obtained 6 Dec. 2012, from <www.dodccrp.org/files/N2C2M2_web_optimized.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, Charles, Normal Accidents: Living With High Risk Technologies (Princeton UP 1999 rev. ed./ NY: Basic Books 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, Charles, ‘A Personal Note on Normal Accidents’, Organization Environment 17/9 (March 2004), 9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, Charles, ‘Difficulties with Network Centric Warfare’, in Jacques S. Gansler and, Hans Binnendijk (eds), Information Assurance: Trends in Vulnerabilities, Threats, and Technologies (Washington DC: National Defense Univ. 2004), 132–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A., Putting Your Young Men into the Mud. Land and Warfare Studies Centre Working Paper No. 124 (Dandroon, Australia: Army Land Warfare Studies Centre 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton UP 1993), 40.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, Melissa A., ‘Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity’, Academy of Management Review 25/2 (April 2000), 312–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, Eitan, ‘The Long and Winding Road: The US Army Managerial Approach to Command and the Adoption of Mission Command (Auftragstaktik)’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/5 (Oct. 2010), 645–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, Eitan Transforming Command: The Pursuit of Mission Command in the US, UK, and Israeli Armies (Stanford UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sookermany, Anders McD., ‘The Embodied Soldier: Towards a New Epistemological Foundation of Soldiering Skills in the (Post) Modernized Norwegian Armed Forces’, Armed Forces and Society 37/3 (July 2010), 469–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowers, Thomas S., ‘Nanomanagement – Superior Control and Subordinate Authority in Conflict’, Doctoral thesis, London School of Economics (2011), 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Spacie, Keith, ‘Mission Command in Peace Support Operations: Does it Apply?’, in Peter Essens, Ad Vogelaar, Erhan Tanercan, and Donna Winslow (eds), The Human in Command: Peace Support Operations (Amsterdam/Breda: Mets & Schilt/KMA 2001), 205–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Keith G., ‘Mission Command: Problem Bounding or Problem Solving?’, Canadian Military Journal 9/4 (2009), 50–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Keith G. ‘The Evolution of Command Approach’, paper presented at the 15th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Santa Monica, CA, 23 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, James D., Organizations in Action: Social Sciences Bases of Administrative Theory (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction 2003 rev. ed./ New York: McGraw-Hill 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Vogelaar, Ad L. W. and Eric-Hans Kramer, ‘Mission Command in Dutch Peace Support Missions’, Armed Forces and Society 30/3 (Spring 2004), 409–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E., Making Sense of the Organization, Volume II: The Impermanent Organization (Southern Gate, Chichester: Wiley 2009).
   Google Scholar