Bridging the Gap: Mobilisation Constraints and Contractor Support to US and UK Military Operations

Bibliography

• Avant, D., The Market for Force (New York: CUP 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D. and L. Sigelman, ‘Private Security and Democracy: Lessons from the US in Iraq’, Security Studies 19/2 (2010), 230–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. and C. Elman, ‘Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield’, Comparative Political Studies 40/2 (2007), 170–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensahel, N., ‘Mission Not Accomplished: What Went Wrong with Iraqi Reconstruction’, Journal of Strategic Studies 29/3 (June 2006), 453–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T., ‘Contracting Out Security’, Journal of Strategic Studies 36/5 (Oct. 2013), 638–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, E., Military Forces: What is the Appropriate Size for the United States? (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service Report to Congress 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., ‘An Autopsy of the Iraq Debacle: Policy Failure or Bridge Too Far?’ Security Studies 17/4 (2008), 599– 643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldicott, Michael, To What Extent Should Contractors Contribute to Future British Military Contingencies Overseas? (Shrivenham: Joint Services Command and Staff College Defence Research Paper 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Carmola, Kateri, ‘PMSCs and Risk in Counterinsurgency Warfare’, in Christopher Kinsey and Malcolm H. Patterson (eds), Contractors and War: The Transformation of United States’ Expeditionary Operations (Stanford UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Caverley, J., ‘The Myth of Military Myopia: Democracy, Small Wars, and Vietnam’, International Security 34/3 ( 2009/10), 119–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caverley, J., Democratic Militarism: Voting, Wealth, and War (Cambridge: Cambridge CUP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. and M. Safran, ‘Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom’, Foreign Policy Analysis 2/2 (2006), 137–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W., ‘Colonial Warfare in a Post-Colonial State: British Operations in Helmand Province in Afghanistan’, Defence Studies 10/1-2 (2010), 215–47.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton UP 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., D. Sanders, M. Stewart and P. Whiteley, Performance Politics and the British Voter (Cambridge: CUP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E., Citizens and Soldiers: The Dilemmas of Military Service (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, P. and A. Dorman, ‘Blair’s Wars and Brown’s Budgets: from Strategic Defence Review to Strategic Decay in Less Than a Decade’, International Affairs 85/2 (2009), 247–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., Squandered Victory: The American Occupation and the Bungled Effort to Bring Democracy to Iraq (New York: Times Books 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, P., ‘Britain’s Vietnam Syndrome? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia’, Review of International Studies 26/1 (2000), 99–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunigan, M., Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness (Stanford UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, C., Vietnam Studies: Base Development in South Vietnam, 1965–1970 (Washington DC: Department of the Army 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Egnell, R., ‘Lessons from Helmand, Afghanistan: What Now for British Counterinsurgency?’, International Affairs 87/2 (2011), 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichenberg, R., Stoll R. and Lebo M., ‘War President: The Approval Ratings of George W. Bush’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50/6 (2006), 783–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. and S. Gordon, ‘COIN Machine’, RUSI Journal 154/3 (2009),18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., A Million Bullets: The Real Story of the British Army in Afghanistan (London: Bantam 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A., In the Shadow of the Garrison State (Princeton UP 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Gelpi, C., P. Feaver and D. Reifler, Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion & Casualties in Military Conflicts (Princeton UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gough, T. US Army Mobilization and Logistics in the Korean War: A Research Approach (Washington DC: Center of Military History 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T.X., Private Contractors in Conflict Zones: The Good, the Bad and the Strategic Impact’ (Washington DC: National Defense Univ. Strategic Forum 260 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Higginson, A. ‘Contractor Support to Operations (CSO) – Proactive or Reactive Support?’, RUSI Defence Systems (Dec. 2010), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J., The State and International Relations (Cambridge: CUP 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O., American Public Opinion on the War on Iraq (Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. and M. Levendusky, ‘Drafting Support for War: Conscription and Mass Support for Warfare’, Journal of Politics 74/2 (2012), 323–38.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Constitution Committee’s Fifteenth Report, Waging War: Parliament’s Role and Responsibility (London: The Stationery Office 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D., Private Military Contractors and US Grand Strategy (Oslo: Peace Research Institute of Oslo Report 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jentleson, B. and R. Britton, ‘Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42/4 (1998), 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., ‘Averting Failure in Afghanistan’, Survival 48/1 (2009), 111–28.
   Google Scholar
• Karol, D. and E. Miguel, ‘The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election’, Journal of Politics 69/3 (2007), 633–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, D., ‘The United Kingdom’, in A. Danchev and J. MacMillan (eds), The Iraq War and Democratic Politicsm (London: Routledge 2005), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., ‘Understanding the Helmand Campaign: British Military Operations in Afghanistan’, International Affairs 86/2 (2010), 311–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsey, C. and M. Patterson, Contractors and War: The Transformation of United States’ Expeditionary Operations (Stanford UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, C., Private Contractors and the Reconstruction of Iraq (New York: Routledge 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, E., States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security (Cambridge: CUP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Larson, E., Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for US Military Operations (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna, ‘The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies’, Millennium 33/3 (2005), 821.
   Google Scholar
• Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro (eds), Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: CUP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E., ‘A Post-Heroic Military Policy’, Foreign Affairs 75/4 (1996) 33– 44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, R., Armies Without States: the Privatization of Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, R., ‘Overview of American Government Expeditionary Operations Utilizing Private Contractors’, in C. Kinsey and M. Patterson, Contractors and War: The Transformation of United States’ Expeditionary Operations (Stanford UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J., Boots on the Ground: Troop Density in Contingency Operations (Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Merom, Gil, How Democracies Lose Small Wars (New York: CUP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovich Konovalov, I. and O. Vital’evich Valeckiy, Evoluciya Chastnyh Voennyh Kompaniy [The Development of Private Military Companies]’ (Pushkino, Russia: Centr Strategicheskoy Kon”yunktury 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Petersohn, U., ‘The Effectiveness of Contracted Coalitions. Private Security Contractors in Iraq’, Armed Forces and Society 39/3 (2013), 467–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifler, J., T. Scotto and D. Clarke, ‘Foreign Policy Beliefs in Contemporary Britain: Structure and Relevance’, International Studies Quarterly 55/1 (2011), 245–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, D. and A. Stam, Democracies at War (Princeton UP 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ricks, T., Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq (New York: Penguin 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., ‘Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy’, World Politics 51/1 (1998), 144–72.
   Google Scholar
• Russett, Bruce, Controlling the Sword. The Democratic Governance of National Security (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Schooner, Steven L., ‘Why Contractor Fatalities Matter’, Parameters 38/3 (2008), 78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., The Department of Defense’s Use of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq: Background, Analysis, and Options for Congress (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R., Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power (Princeton UP 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M., The New Western Way of War: Risk-Transfer War and its Crisis in Iraq (Cambridge: Polity Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W., Corporate Warriors (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W., ‘Can’t Win with ‘Em, Can’t Go to War without ‘Em’ (Washington DC: Brookings Institute 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W., The Politics of British Defence Policy, 1945–1962 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, R., The Impact of Public Opinion on US Foreign Policy: Constraining the Colossus (New York: Oxford UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, L., ‘Creighton Abrams and Active-Reserve Integration in Warfare’, Parameters 21 (1991), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Special Inspector General on Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Office (Washington DC: Government Printing Office 30 Oct. 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, SIGIR Special Report Number 2: the Human Toll of Reconstruction or Stabilization during Iraqi Freedom (Washington DC: Government Printing Office July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, Hard Lessons. The Iraq Reconstruction Experience (Washington DC: Government Printing Office 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Stanger, A., A Nation Under Contract (New Haven, CT: Yale UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H., ‘The Civil-Military “Gap” in Britain’, Journal of Strategic Studies 26/2 (2003), 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, C., ‘The Time When the British Army Was Really Stretched’, BBC News Magazine, 22 July 2011, <www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14218909>.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, H., On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War (New York: Presidio Press 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Taliaferro, J., ‘State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State’, Security Studies 15/3 (2006), 464–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Defence, Tiger Team Final Report, Contractor Support to Operations (London: 16 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, Future Reserves 2020: The Independent Commission to Review the United Kingdom’s Reserve Forces (London: July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• US Congress Commission on Wartime Contracting, Final Report, Transforming Wartime Contracting. Controlling Costs, Reducing Risks (Washington DC: Aug. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Labor, Defense Base Act Case Summary by Nation ( Washington DC: 31 March 2010), <www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/dbaallnation.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• US General Accounting Office, Contingency Operations. Opportunities to Improve the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (Washington DC: Feb. 1997).
   Google Scholar
• US General Accounting Office, ‘Contractors Provide Vital Services to Deployed Forces but are Not Adequately Addressed in DOD Plans’ (Washington DC: June 2003).
   Google Scholar
• US Government Accountability Office, ‘Rebuilding Iraq. Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers’ (Washington, DC: July 2005).
   Google Scholar
• US House of Representatives, ‘National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’, Title F, Subtitle 5, 112th Congress, H.R 1540 (Washington DC: 14 April 2011).
   Google Scholar
• US Senate Armed Forces Committee, Report of the Inquiry into the Role and Oversight of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan (28 Sept. 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Uttley, M., ‘Private Contractors on Deployed Operations: the United Kingdom Experience’, Defence Studies 4/2 (2004), 145–65.
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera, S., Guide to the Methods in the Social Sciences (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J., ‘Shouldering the Soldiering: Democracy, Conscription, and Military Casualties’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49/6 (2005), 849–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, David M., Defense Acquisitions: DOD’s Increased Reliance on Service Contractors Exacerbates Long-Standing Challenges (Washington DC: Government Accountability Office 23 Jan. 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K., Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience (New York: Little, Brown 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F., From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role (Princeton UP 1998).
   Google Scholar