The History of Proliferation Optimism: Does It Have a Future?

Bibliography

• Albright, David, Peddling Peril: How the Secret Nuclear Trade Arms America’s Enemies (New York: Free Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bleek, Philipp, ‘The Nuclear Domino Myth: Why Proliferation Rarely Begets Proliferation’, PhD dissertation, Department of Government, Georgetown Univ., 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, The Absolute Weapons: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1946).
   Google Scholar
• Clapper, R. James, ‘Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community’, Statement for the Record, US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 29 Jan. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fissile Materials Working Group, ‘After Bin Laden: Nuclear Terrorism Still a Top Threat’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 13 May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, Marie Pierre, Stratégie de l’âge nucléaire (Paris: François-Xavier de Guibert 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, Marie Pierre, Le Sablier du Siecle: memoires (Lausanne: L’Age d’homme 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Frank, ‘The Ivory Tower–Policy Gap in the Nuclear Proliferation Debate’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (Aug. 2012), 573–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., ‘Blasts from the Past: Proliferation Lessons from the 1960s’, International Security 29/3 (Winter 2004/2005), 100–35.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles, Analyzing Strategic Nuclear Policy (Princeton UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael, ‘The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict: Does Experience Matter?’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 53/2 (April 2009), 234–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl, Colin, ‘Policy Pessimism vs. Proliferation Optimism: The Case of Iran,’ Paper Prepared for the Nuclear Studies Research Initiative Launch Conference, Austin, TX, 17—19 Oct. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Herman, On Thermonuclear War (New York: Greenwood Press 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Karl, David J., ‘Proliferation Optimism and Pessimism Revisited,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 34/4 (Aug. 2011), 619–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr, Klaus, Limited Strategic War (New York: Praeger 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, Wilfred L., French Nuclear Diplomacy (Princeton UP 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew, Exporting the Bomb: Technology Transfer and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew, ‘Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve’, International Organization 67/1 (2013), 141–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew and Barry, Pavel, “How to Deter Terrorism,” The Washington Quarterly 35/2 (Spring 2012), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Michael, On Nuclear Terrorism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Litwak, Robert, Outlier States: American Strategies to Change, Contain, or Engage Regimes (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John, ‘The Case for a Ukrainian Deterrent’, Foreign Affairs 72/3 (Summer 1993), 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John and Stephen Walt, ‘An Unnecessary War’, Foreign Policy (Jan./Feb. 2003), 51–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, Bueno Bruce de and William H. Riker, ‘An Assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 29/2 (June 1982), 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry, ‘ A Nuclear-Armed Iran: A Difficult, but not Impossible Policy Problem’, Century Foundation Report, 2006, <http://web.mit.edu/cis/pdf/posen_frenchcen.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, ‘Nuclear Brinkmanship with Two-Sided Incomplete Information’, American Political Science Review 82/1 (1988), 155–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, ‘Nuclear Deterrence and the Strategy of Limited Retaliation’, American Political Science Review 83/2 (1989), 503–19.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Search for Credibility (New York: Cambridge UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Rauchhaus, Robert, ‘Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis: A Quantitative Approach’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 53/2 (April 2009), 258–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsfeld, Donald, The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America (Washington DC: Dept. of Defense March 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., and Kenneth N. Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate (New York: Norton 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton UP 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, M. Harvey, ‘The US Navy’s Fleet Ballistic Missile Program and Finite Deterrence’, in Henry D. Sokolski (ed.), Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Scheinman, Lawrence, Atomic Energy Policy in France under the Fourth Republic (Princeton UP 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas, Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Paper 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale UP 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn H., ‘The Balance of Power and the Balance of Terror’, in Paul Seabury (ed.), The Balance of Power (San Francisco: Chandler 1965), 184–201.
   Google Scholar
• Tertais, Bruno, ‘Destruction Assurée: The Origins and Development of French Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1982’, in Henry D. Sokolski (ed.), Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Viner, Jacob, ‘The Implications of the Atomic Bomb for International Relations’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (1945).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth, ‘The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better’, Adelphi Papers 171 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth, ‘Why Iran Should Get the Bomb’, Foreign Affairs (July/Aug. 2012), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Steven, ‘The End of the Business Cycle?’ Foreign Affairs 76/4 (July/Aug. 1997), 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, Albert, The Delicate Balance of Power (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘Nuclear Sharing: NATO and the N+1 Country’, Foreign Affairs 39/3 (April 1961), 355–87.
   Google Scholar