Missile Strategy in a Post-Nuclear Age

Bibliography

• Acton, James M., Deterrence During Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security, Adelphi Papers No. 417 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘The Fungibility of Force’, in Robert J. Art and Kenneth N. Waltz (eds), The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics, 5th ed. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Defence, Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030 (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ayson, Robert, Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science (London: Frank Cass 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ayson, Robert, Hedley Bull and the Accommodation of Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Desmond, Can Nuclear War be Controlled?, Adelphi Paper No. 169 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies Autumn 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Beaufre, André, Deterrence and Strategy (London: Faber 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Stephen, Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle (Princeton UP 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, Paul, ‘Command and Control for a Long War’, Air Force Magazine (April 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, The Absolute Weapon (New York: Harcourt Brace 1946).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, Strategy in the Missile Age (Princeton UP 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley, ‘Disarmament and the International System’, Australian Journal of Politics and History 5/1 (May 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley, ‘Society and Anarchy in International Relations’, in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds), Diplomatic Investigations (London: Allen & Unwin 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, Elaine and Vincent A. Manzo, ‘Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Strategic Asset or Unusable Liability?’, Strategic Forum, Institute for National Strategic Studies, Feb. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Carlen, P.L. et al., ‘Phantom limbs and related phenomena in recent traumatic amputations’, Neurology 28/3 (March 1978).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Ashton B., ‘The Command and Control of Nuclear War’, Scientific American 252/1 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Michael S. and Andrew S. Erickson, ‘A Competitive Strategy with Chinese Characteristics: The Second Artillery’s Growing Conventional Forces and Missions’, in Thomas G. Mahnken (ed.), Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History and Practice (Stanford UP 2012), 206–18.
   Google Scholar
• Early, Bryan R. and Christopher Way, ‘Launching Nukes and Nuclear Weapons Programs: The Spread of Ballistic Missile Technology and Nuclear Proliferation’, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, 30 Aug.–2 Sept. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson, Harold A. (ed.) The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-alerting of Nuclear Weapons (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Fetter, Steve, ‘Ballistic Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction: What is the Threat? What Should be Done?’ International Security 16/1 (Summer 1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Randall, ‘Abolishing Ballistic Missiles: Pros and Cons’, International Security 12/1 (Summer 1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jonah, ‘The Case for Conventional Prompt Global Strike’, 11 Aug. 2011. Center for Strategic and International Studies, <http://csis.org/blog/case-conventional-prompt-global-strike>.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Alton, ‘Zero Ballistic Missiles’, Foreign Policy, 88 (Autumn 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Nancy, W., ‘International Security on the Road to Nuclear Zero’, Nonproliferation Review (Winter 2011), 18/2.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, Dennis, Missile Contagion: Cruise Missile Proliferation and the Threat to International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, S., Nuclear Strategy and National Style (Boston: Hamilton Press 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Brian, Testimony for the Senate Armed Services Committee Strategic Forces Subcommittee Hearing Regarding Global Strike Issues, 28 March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Michael J. and Katsuhisa Furukawa, ‘Japan: New Nuclear Realism’, in Muthiah Alagappa (ed.), The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia (Stanford UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Elaine M., ‘ Conventional Arms No Substitute for Nuclear: Strategic Command Official’, Nuclear Threat Initiative, 29 Feb. 2012, </www.nti.org/gsn/article/conventional-arms-no-substitute-nuclear-strategic-command-official/>.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Michael, ‘Problems of a Disarmed World’, in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: Unwin University Books 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Huisken, Ron, ‘A Political Strategy for Nuclear Disarmament’, unpublished paper, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel, L., ‘Conventional Deterrence and Conventional Retaliation in Europe’, International Security 8 ( Winter 1983–84).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, Eliminating Nuclear Threats: Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (Canberra: ICNNPD 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Herman, Thinking About the Unthinkable in the 1980s (New York: Simon & Schuster 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyun-Wook, Nuclear Posture Review and its implications on the Korean Peninsula, Center for US-Korea Policy 2/5 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lanoszka Alexander, ‘Protection States Trust?: Major Power Patronage, Nuclear Behavior, and Alliance Dynamics’, PhD dissertation, Princeton Univ., 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Leah, Christine, M., ‘Australia and Nuclear Strategy’, PhD dissertation, Australian National Univ., 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Leah, Christine M., ‘US Extended Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Order: An Australian Perspective’, Asian Security 8/2 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘The New Era of Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Conflict’, Strategic Studies Quarterly ( Spring 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lutsch, Andreas, ‘The Federal Republic of Germany’s Nuclear Security Policy Between the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the NATO Dual Track Decision’, PhD dissertation, Univ. of Mainz, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lutsch, Andreas, ‘Inevitable But Highly Controversial? The Accession of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) to the NPT (1967–1975)’, Paper presented to the 2013 SHAFR annual conference, April 2013, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, D.G., Truman (New York: Simon & Schuster 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Miasnikov, Eugene, ‘The Air-Space Threat to Russia’, Carnegie Moscow Center, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Patrick, Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, Leopoldo, La Sfida Nucleare: La Politica Esterna Italiana e le Armi Atomiche, 1945–1991 (Bologna: Il Mulino 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie-White, Tanya and David Santoro (eds), Slaying the Nuclear Dragon: Disarmament Dynamics in the Twenty-First Century (Atlanta: Univ. of Georgia Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pay, John, ‘The Battlefield Since 1945’ in Colin McInnes and G.D. Sheffield, Warfare in the Twentieth Century: Theory and Practice (London: Unwin Hyman 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, George, Do Unto Others: Toward a Defensible Nuclear Doctrine (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, George and James Acton, Abolishing Nuclear Weapons (London: Routledge for IISS 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Quester, George H., Deterrence before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background of Modern Strategy (New York: John Wiley 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., ‘The Role of Deterrence in Total Disarmament’, Foreign Affairs 40/3 (April 1962).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., ‘War Without Pain and Other Models’, World Politics 15/3 (April 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale UP 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schoff, James L., Realigning Priorities: The US-Japan Alliance and the Future of Extended Deterrence (Boston: Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S.K. and V.P. Singh, ‘Mathematical Model for Damage Assessment of Composite Panels Subjected to Blast Loading from Conventional Warhead’, Defence Science Journal 45/4 (Oct. 1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn H., Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of National Security (Princeton UP 1961).
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, Bruce, ‘Speed Kills: Analyzing the Deployment of Conventional Ballistic Missiles’, International Security 34/1 (Summer 2009), 113–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, Nina, The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945 (Cambridge: CUP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• ‘US Nuke Umbrella Not Enough’, Korea Times, 19 Feb. 2013, <www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2013/02/120_130747.html>.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Future Strategic Strike Forces (Washington DC: Office of the Defense Science Board Feb. 2004).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Time Critical Conventional Strike from Strategic Standoff (Washington DC: Office of the Defense Science Board March 2009).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) Report (Washington DC: Department of Defense 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock, Craig, ‘US Looks to Nonnuclear Weapons to Use as a Deterrent’, Washington Post, 8 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, Amy, Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues (Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, 13 Feb. 2012).
   Google Scholar