Impediments to Fighting the Islamic State: Private Contractors and US Strategy

Bibliography

• Avant, Deborah, The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security (New York: CUP 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, John, James J. Wirtz and Colin Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 3rd ed. (New York: OUP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Brooke-Holland, Louisa and Claire Mills, International Affairs and Defence Section, House of Commons Library, ‘ISIS: the military response in Iraq and Syria’, 17 Oct. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, Thomas C. Patriots for Profit: Contractors and the Military in US National Security (Stanford: Stanford UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, Transforming Wartime Contracting: Controlling costs, reducing risks dated Aug. 2011 is available at ≤www.wartimecontracting.gov>.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Contractors’ Support of US Operations in Iraq (Washington DC: CBO, Aug. 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dunigan, Molly, Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness (Stanford: Stanford UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Gansler Commission Report, ‘Urgent Reform Required: Army Expeditionary Contracting’, Report of the Commission on Army Acquisition and Program Management in Expeditionary Operations (called the Gansler Commission report after its chairman), 31 Oct. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert M., Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War (New York: Knopf 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office, ‘Report to Congressional Committees. Defense Contractors. Information on the Impact of Reducing the Cap on Employee Compensation Costs,’ Washington DC: GAO, June 2013 ( GAO-13-566).
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, Richard F., ‘Declarations of War and Authorizations for the Use of Military Force: Historical Background and Legal Implications’, CRS Report for Congress, updated 11 Aug. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, Richard F., ‘War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance’, CRS Report for Congress, 23 Sept. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, Alex and Raj Sharma, ‘Finding a Cure for What Ails Defense Acquisition’, Government Executive 8 May 2015 available at www.govexec.com/defense/2015/05/cure-what-what-ails-defense-acquisition/112278.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Andrew A., Leonard Wong, and Stephen J. Gerras, ‘Self-Interest Well Understood”: The Origins & Lessons of Public Confidence in the Military”’, Daedalus 142/2 ( Spring 2013), 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House Armed Services Committee, ‘Challenges to Doing Business with the Department of Defense’, 19 March 2012 available at ≤http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=f60b62cb-ce5d-44b7-a2aa-8b693487cd44>.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, Kenneth, ‘Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights’, CRS Report for Congress, 22 Aug. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, Kenneth, ‘Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights’, CRS Report for Congress, 12 Aug. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, Kenneth, Christopher M. Blanchard, Carla E. Humud, Rhoda Margesson, and Matthew C. Weed, “The ‘Islamic State’ Crisis and US Policy’ CRS Report for Congress, 8 Jan. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Tara ‘Redefining Inherently Governmental: The Push to Redefine the Function and Its Consequences’, Journal of International Peace Operations 4/1 ( July-Aug. 2008), 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Light, Paul C. A Government Ill Executed: The Decline of the Federal Service and How to Reverse It (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Luckey, John R., Valerie Bailey Grasso, and Kate M. Manuel, ‘Inherently Governmental Functions and Department of Defense Operations: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress’, CRS Report for Congress, 15 June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G. and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds.), Strategic Studies: A Reader (London: Routledge Publishers 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, Kate M., ‘Definitions of “Inherently Governmental Function” in Federal Procurement Law and Guidance’, CRS Report for Congress, 23 Dec. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, Barack, National Security Strategy (Washington DC: The White House, Feb. 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) ‘National Defense Budget Estimated for FY 2013’ available at http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2013/FY13_Green_Book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Professional Services Council, ‘2014 Acquisition Policy Survey’. Available at <http://issuu.com/professionalservicescouncil/docs/2014_psc_survey_final?e=4503160/11053683≥.
   Google Scholar
• Stuster, J. Dana and Bill French, Confronting the Islamic State: An Assessment of US Strategic Options (Washington, DC: The National Security Network, Feb. 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Moshe and Jennifer Church, ‘Department of Defense’s Use of Contractors to Support Military Operations: Background, Analysis, and Issues for Congress’, CRS Report for Congress, 17 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Moshe ’Summary’ ‘Defense Acquisition Reform: Background, Analysis and Issues for Congress’, CRS Report for Congress, 23 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz Moshe, Wendy Ginsberg, and John E. Sargent Jr, ‘Defense Acquisitions: How and Where DOD Spends Its Contracting Dollars’, CRS Report for Congress 30 April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of Defense, Acquisitions, Technology, and Logistics, Performance of the Defense Acquisition System 2014 Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter, Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Stanger, Allison, One Nation Under Contract: The Outsourcing of American Power and the Future of Foreign Policy (New Haven, CT: Yale UPs 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: CUP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Torreon, Barbara Salazar ‘Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798–2015’, CRS Report for Congress, 15 Jan. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Performance of the Defense Acquisition System 2014 Annual Report (Washington DC: USD[AT&l], 13 June 2014, 4. Available at <http://www.acq.osd.mil/≥.
   Google Scholar
• US House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, ‘Challenges to Doing Business with the Department of Defense: Findings of the Panel on Business Challenges in the Defense Industry,’ 19 March 2012 available at <http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=f60b62cb-ce5d-44b7-a2aa-8b693487cd44≥.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate Committee on Armed Services, ‘Global Challenges and US National Security Strategy’, 27 Jan. 2015. Available at <www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/15-01-27-global-challenges-and-us-national-security-strategy≥.
   Google Scholar
• SIGIR Final Report, Learning from Iraq, March 2013 available at www.sigir.mil.
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, Stan and Phil Kangas, ‘ Fixing Acquisition: An Opportunity Lost?’ Government Executive available at ≤http://issuu.com/professionalservicescouncil/docs/2014_psc_survey_final?e=4503160/11053683>.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate Staff Report. ‘Defense Acquisition Reform: Where Do We Go From Here? A Compendium of Views by Leading Experts’ Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations United States Senate, 2 Oct. 2014. Available at http:www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations
   Google Scholar
• van Veen, Edwin and Nick Grinstead, Iraqi Imbroglio: the Islamic State and Beyond (The Hague: Clingendael Institute, Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Weed, Matthew C., ‘The War Powers Resolution: Concepts and Practice’ CRS Report for Congress 3 April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, Matthew C., ‘2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force: Issues Concerning Its Continued Application’, CRS Report for Congress 14 April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, Elliott (‘Cory’) ‘The Yoder Three-Tier Model for Optimal Planning and Execution of Contingency Contracting’, Acquisition Research Working Paper Series (2005-05-01): available at ≤/www.acquisitionresearch.net/publications/>.
   Google Scholar