Escaping the iron cage: the institutional foundations of FM 3-24. counterinsurgency doctrine

Bibliography

• Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 3/3 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, Alexander, ‘US COIN Doctrine and Practice: An Ally’s Perspective’, Parameters (Winter 2007–2008), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham and Philip Zelikow, The Essence of Decision: Exploring the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Longman, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris, On Organizational Learning (Cambridge: Blackwell Business, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris, Overcoming Organizational Defenses (Needham: Allyn and Bacon, 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris, Reasoning, Learning, and Action (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Joseph, ‘French Tactical Doctrine 1870-1914’, Military Affairs, 42/2, (1978), 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Major Jay, ‘Tal Afar 2005: Laying the Counterinsurgency Groundwork’, Army ( June 2009), 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, Keith B., Mars Learning: The Marine Corps Development of Small Wars Doctrine, 1915–1940 (Boulder: Westview, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Clancy, Tom and Franks, Fredrick, Into the Storm: A Study in Command (New York: Berkley, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Eliot, Jan Horvath, Conrad Crane and John Nagl, ‘Principles, Imperatives, and Paradoxes of Counterinsurgency’, Military Review ( March/April 2006), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, Richard and James A. March, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Defense Science Board, Transitions to and from Hostilities (Washington: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, ‘Directive 3000.05, Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations’ (28 November 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report (Washington: Department of Defense, 6 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, Karl W., ‘On Theory and Research in Innovation’, in Richard L. Merritt and Anna J. Merritt (eds), Innovation in the Public Sector (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, Peter and Eugene Gholz, Buying Military Transformation: Technological Innovation and the Defense Industry (New York: Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony, Inside Bureaucracy (Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria II, Antulio J., ‘Reconsidering War’s Logic and Grammar’, Infinity Journal, 2 ( Spring 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Engel, Gregory A., ‘Cruise Missiles and the Tomahawk’, in Bradd C. Hayes and Douglas V. Smith (eds) The Politics of Naval Innovation (Newport, RI: US Naval War College 1994), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, Matthew, Law, Ethics, and the War on Terror (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Theo and Terriff, Terry, The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology and Ideas (London: Lynn Rienner, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Field Manual Interim 3-07.22 Counterinsurgency Operations (Washington: Department of the Army, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• FM 3-24 Counterinsurgency (Washington: Department of the Army December 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J.F.C., The Conduct of War 1789–1961 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1961).
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Scott W. and Cashen, Luke H., ‘A Multidimensional Examination of Slack and its Impact on Innovation’, Journal of Managerial Issues, 14/1 (Spring 2002), 68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Genieys, William, The New Custodians of the State: Programmatic Elite in French Society (New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Genieys, William and Marc Smyrl, Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Strategy for Chaos: Revolutions in Military Affairs and the Evidence of History (London: Frank Cass, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, Adam, ‘The Future of Military Innovation Studies’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 29/5 (October 2006), 905–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Peter, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, Special Issue 46/1 ( Winter, 1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, J.T., ‘Organizational Innovation and Organizational Change, Annual Review of Sociology, 25 (1999), 597–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, Morton, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, Christopher. ‘Principles and Priorities in Training for Iraq,’ Military Review (March–April 2007), 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Høiback, Harald, ‘What is Doctrine?’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 34/6 (2011), 879–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, Jonathan M., ‘The Decisive Attack: A New Look at French Infantry Tactics on the Even of World War I’, Military Affairs, 40/4 (1976), 164–69.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel, ‘Interservice Competition and the Political Roles of the Armed Services’, The American Political Science Review, 55/1 (1961), 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowitz, Morris, The Professional Soldier. A Social and Political Portrait (New York/London: Free Press, 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, Adam, ‘A Revolution from the Middle: How the U.S. Army Transformed its Way of War’, International Studies Association Panel, Concepts at War (3 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Fred, The Insurgents: David Petraeus and the Plot to Change the American Way of War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David, ‘Twenty-Eight Articles Fundamentals of Company-level Counterinsurgency’, Small Wars Journal, 2/1 (March, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Knox, Dudley W., ‘The Role of Doctrine in Naval Warfare’, U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 41/2 (1915).
   Google Scholar
• Krepnevich, Andrew F., ‘Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions’, The National Interest, 37 ( Fall, 1994), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas, ‘Uncovering Foreign Military Innovation’, The Journal of Strategy Studies, 24/4 (1999), 26–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas, Uncovering Ways of War: U.S. Intelligence and Foreign Military Innovation, 1918–1941 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Manea, Octavian, ‘Reflections on the “Counterinsurgency Decadeˮ: Small Wars Journal Interview with General David H. Petraeus’, Small Wars Journal (1 September 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, Susan L., Unconventional Warfare: Rebuilding US Special Operations Forces (Washington, DC: Brookings 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Measuring the Humanitarian Impact of War Workshop (Washington, DC: Harvard University’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, 8–9 November 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Multi-National Force Iraq (MNFI), Counterinsurgency Handbook (Iraq, Camp Taji: Counterinsurgency Center for Excellence, May 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nagl, John, ‘Constructing the Legacy of FM 3–24, Joint Forces Quarterly, 58/3 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson, The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, William A., ‘Creating a U.S. Military Revolution’, in Theo Farrell and Terry Terriff (eds) The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002), 205–20.
   Google Scholar
• Petraeus, David H., ‘Learning Counterinsurgency: Observations from Soldiering in Iraq’, Military Review (January/February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Petraeus, David H., ‘Preface’, Military Review Special Edition (October 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Petraeus, David H., ‘Commanding General Multi-National Force-Iraq, interview with Alexander Alderson’ (14 June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry, The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the Wars (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Ricks, Thomas, The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006–2008 (New York: Penguin Press, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen Peter, ‘New Ways of War’, International Security, 13/1 (1988), 134–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen Peter, Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James, Innovation, Transformation, and War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, 2005-2007 (Pal Alto: Stanford University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sabatie, Paul and Jenkins-Smith, Hank (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Sepp, Kalev, ‘Best Practices in Counterinsurgency’, Military Review (May-June, 2005), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, D. Michael, Deadly Paradigms: The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, John Lewis, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack, The Ideology of the Offensive (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Strategy, Change and Defensive Reform (Boston: Pitman, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, Richard, Hearts and Minds in Guerrilla Warfare: The Malayan Emergency, 1948–1960 (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Gordon R., ‘Army Imperative in Peacetime: Keep the Edge’, Army Times (6 January 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Szayna, Thomas S., Eaton, Derek and Richardson, Amy, Preparing the Army for Stability Operations: Doctrinal and Interagency Issues (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Taw, Jennifer, Mission Revolution: The U.S. Military and Stability Operations (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., ‘The Institutional Sources of Military Doctrine: Hegemons in Peripheral Wars’, International Studies Quarterly, 37/4 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucko, David, The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the U.S. Military for Modern Wars (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• USMC Training and Education Command and United States Naval Academy, ‘Pedagogy for the Long War: Teaching Irregular Warfare’.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Bob, ‘Meet the press: New Combined Arms Center commander discusses Iraq, training, leaders, lessons-learned, Fort Leavenworth Lamp, August 28, 2003, http://www.tradoc.army.mil ( homepage), date accessed 30 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weigley, Russell F., The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James Q., Bureaucracy (New York: Basic Books, 1989), 219–21.
   Google Scholar
• Working with Civilian Actors (Arlington, VA: Harvard University’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy (5–6 April 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Donald P. and Reese, Timothy R., The United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom, May 2003-January 2005: On Point II: Transition to the New Campaign (Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute, 2008).
   Google Scholar