The Crowe Memorandum, the Rebalance to Asia, and Sino-US Relations

Bibliography

• Art, Robert J., A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘The United States and the Rise of China: Implications for the Long Haul’, Political Science Quarterly 125/3 (2010), 359–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, James E. and Robyn Lim, ‘The Maritime Basis of American Security in East Asia’, Naval War College Review 54/1 (2000), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, James M., The Double Alliance versus the Triple Entente (New York: Hardpress 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, Nick and Andrew Phillips, ‘Rebalance to Where?: U.S. Strategic Geography in Asia’, Survival 55/5 (2013), 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, F.R. and Roger Bullen, The Great Powers and the European States System 1814–1914 (Harlow: Pearson 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve, China, the U.S., and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique (New York: Routledge, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve, ‘Exploring Puzzles in Power-Transition Theory: Implications for Sino-American Relations’, Security Studies 13/3 (2004), 103–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Jian, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Ja Ian and Todd H. Hall, ‘The Lessons of 1914 for East Asia Today: Missing the Trees for the Forest’, International Security 39/1 (2014), 7–43.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Thomas J., ‘Posing Problems without Catching up: China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy’, International Security 25/4 (2001), 5–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Christopher, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (New York: HarperCollins 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, Hillary, ‘America’s Pacific Century’, Foreign Policy, November 2011, <http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century>.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Bernard D., The Great Wall at Sea: China’s Navy in the Twenty-First Century, 2nd edn (Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Corp, Edward T., ‘The Problem of Promotion in the Career of Sir Eyre Crowe, 1905–1920’, Australian Journal of Politics & History 28/2 (1982), 236–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corp, Edward T., ‘Sir Eyre Crowe and Georges Clemenceau at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919–20’, Diplomacy and Statecraft 8/1 (1997), 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Corp, Edward T., ‘Sir Eyre Crowe and the Administration of the Foreign Office’, Historical Journal 22/2 (1979), 443–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrave, Richard A., ‘The Career of Sir Eyre Crowe: A Reassessment’, Albion 4/4 (1972), 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrave, Richard A., ‘Sir Eyre Crowe and the British Foreign Office, 1905–1914’, PhD dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, Eyre, ‘Memorandum on the Present State of British Relations with France and Germany, January 1, 1907’, in G.P. Gooch and Harold Temperley’ (eds), British Documents on the Origins of the War, Vol. 3, The Testing of the Entente, 1904–6 (London: HMSO 1928), 397–420.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, Sibyl E., ‘Sir Eyre Crowe and the Locarno Pact’, English Historical Review 87/342 (1972), 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, Sibyl and Edward Corp, Our Ablest Public Servant: Sir Eyre Crowe, 1864–1925 (Braunton: Merlin Books 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Dehio, Ludwig, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of European Power Struggle (London: Chatto & Windus 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Jonathan, ‘From “Pearls” to “Arrows”: Rethinking the “String of Pearls” Theory of China’s Naval Ambitions’, Comparative Strategy 33/4 (2014), 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Donilon, Tom, ‘America Is Back in the Pacific and Will Uphold the Rules’, Financial Times, 27 November 2011, <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4f3febac-1761-11e1-b00e-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1lvbgzfyEc>.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J.S., The Crowe Memorandum: Sir Eyre Crowe and Foreign Office Perceptions of Germany, 1918–1925 (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., ‘Beyond Air–Sea Battle: The Debate over US Military Strategy in Asia’, Adelphi Series 54/444 (2014), 11–155.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., ‘Bucking Beijing: An Alternative U.S. China Policy’, Foreign Affairs 91/5 (2012), 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia (New York: W.W. Norton 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., ‘The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?’, International Security 30/2 (2005), 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., ‘The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Explaining Beijing’s Assertiveness’, Washington Quarterly 37/4 (2014), 133–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, John Lewis, ‘The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System’, International Security 10/4 (1986), 99–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompert, David, Sea Power and American Interests in the Western Pacific (Santa Monica CA: RAND 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., The Leverage of Sea Power: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War (New York: Free Press 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Michael, ‘China’s Periphery: Implications for U.S. Policy and Interests’, Orbis 56/3 (2012), 357–69.
   Google Scholar
• Grygiel, Jakub J., Great Powers and Geopolitical Change (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Hale, David and Lyric Hughes Hale, ‘ China Takes off’, Foreign Affairs 82/6 (2003), 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Richard F. and Holger H. Herwig (eds), The Origins of World War I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, Aidan, ‘The Impact of Analogical Reasoning on US Foreign Policy towards Kosovo’, Journal of Peace Research 43/1 (2006), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Herwig, Holger H., Luxury Fleet: The Imperial German Navy 1888–1918 (London: Allen & Unwin 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, James R. and Toshi Yoshihara, ‘History Rhymes: The German Precedent for Chinese Seapower’, Orbis 54/1 (2010), 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Holslag, Jonathan, ‘The Smart Revisionist’, Survival 56/5 (2014), 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, D.P., ‘The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations’, British Journal of Political Science 26/4 (1996), 523–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, Renée, ‘Evaluating the “China Threat”: Power Transition Theory, the Successor-State Image, and the Dangers of Historical Analogies’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 63/2 (2009), 309–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Patrick J., Tirpitz and the Imperial German Navy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Robert E., ‘The “Pivot” and Its Problems: American Foreign Policy in Northeast Asia’, Pacific Review 27/3 (2014), 479–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennan, George, The Decline of Bismarck’s European Order (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, George F., American Diplomacy 1900–1950 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1951).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Paul M., The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Vintage Books 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, Henry, Diplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, Henry, On China (New York: Penguin Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Leffler, Melvyn P., A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Le Mière, Christian, ‘The Specter of an Asian Arms Race’, Survival 56/1 (2014), 139–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberthal, Kenneth and Wang Jisi, Addressing U.S.–China Strategic Distrust (Washington: Brookings 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Robyn, The Geopolitics of East Asia: The Search for Equilibrium (London: Routledge 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, Edward N., The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder, Halford J., Democratic Ideals and Reality (New York: W.W. Norton 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Manicom, James, ‘China and U.S. Seapower in East Asia: Is Accommodation Possible?’, Journal of Strategic Studies 37/3 (2014), 345–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, James, About Face: A History of America’s Curious Relationship with China (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Mastro, Oriana Skylar, ‘Why Chinese Assertiveness Is Here to Stay’, Washington Quarterly 37/4 (2014), 151–70.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, John H., ‘A Rising Power and the Coming of a Great War’, Orbis 58/4 (2014), 500–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mombauer, Annika, The Origins of the First World War: Controversies and Consensus (London: Pearson, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Evan Braden, ‘Contested Primacy in the Western Pacific: China’s Rise and the Future of U.S. Power Projection’, International Security 38/4 (2014), 115–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Andrew, ‘Parallels, Prescience and the Past: Analogical Reasoning and Contemporary International Politics’, International Politics 52/1 (2015), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neiberg, Michael, ‘The 1914 Analogy at War’, Orbis 58/4 (2014), 486–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ninkovich, Frank, The Wilsonian Century: U.S. Foreign Policy since 1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Nish, Ian, The Anglo-Japanese Alliance: The Diplomacy of Two Island Empires, 1894–1907 (London: Athlone Press 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Obama, Barack, ‘Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament’, 17 November 2011, <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarkspresident-obama-australian-parliament>.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.G., ‘Eyre Crowe and British Foreign Policy: A Cognitive Map’, in T.G. Otte and Constantine A. Pagedas (eds), Personalities, War and Diplomacy (London: Frank Cass 1997), 14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Paine, S.C.M., The Wars for Asia, 1911–1941 (New York: Cambridge University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Parent, Joseph M. and Paul K. MacDonald, ‘The Wisdom of Retrenchment: America Must Cut Back to Move Forward’, Foreign Affairs 90/6 (2011), 32–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peifer, Douglas C., ‘China, the German Analogy, and the New Air–Sea Operational Concept’, Orbis 55/1 (2011), 114–31.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Bradford, The Great Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1895–1914 (New York: Scribner, 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Francis, Hirohito’s War: The Pacific War, 1941–1945 (New York: Bloomsbury 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Rapkin, David and William Thompson, ‘Power Transition, Challenge, and the (Re)emergence of China’, International Interactions 29/4 (2003), 315–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, Ely, ‘Rebalancing to Asia with an Insecure China’, Washington Quarterly 36/2 (2013), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Record, Jeffrey, ‘The Use and Abuse of History: Munich, Vietnam and Iraq’, Survival 49/1 (2007), 163–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, Jeffrey, ‘China’s Unraveling Engagement Strategy’, Washington Quarterly 36/4 (2013), 139–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, Richard, ‘Power and International Relations: The Rise of China and Its Effects’, International Studies Perspectives 7/1 (2006), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Robert S., ‘The Problem with the Pivot: Obama’s New Asian Policy Is Unnecessary and Counterproductive’, Foreign Affairs 91/6 (2012), 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostow, Walt W., The United States in the World Arena (New York: Harper & Row 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Sempa, Francis P., Geopolitics: From the Cold War to the 21st Century (New Brunswick NJ: Transaction 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Shlapak, David A., ‘Towards a More Modest American Strategy’, Survival 57/2 (2015), 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondhaus, Lawrence, Preparing for Weltpolitik: German Sea Power before the ‘Tirpitz’ Era (Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J., America’s Strategy in World Politics (New York: Harcourt, Brace 1942).
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J., The Geography of Peace (New York: Harcourt, Brace 1944).
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Jonathan, Yesterday’s Deterrent: Tirpitz and the Birth of the German Battle Fleet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Zara and Keith Neilson, Britain and the Origins of the First World War (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A.J.P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1954).
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, Ashley, ‘Balancing without Containment: A US Strategy for Confronting China’, Washington Quarterly 36/4 (2013), 109–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, Fiona K., A Great Russia: Russia and the Triple Entente, 1905 to 1914 (Westport CT: Praeger 2002).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, ‘Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense’, January 2012, <http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance>.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, Mark, ‘The Impeccable Incident: Truth and Consequences’, China Security 5/2 (2009), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Keith M., ‘Sir Eyre Crowe on the Origins of the Crowe Memorandum of 1 January 1907’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 53/134 (1983), 238–41.
   Google Scholar
• Yahuda, Michael, ‘China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea’, Journal of Contemporary China 22/81 (2013), 446–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshihara, Toshi and James R. Holmes, Red Star over the Pacific: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Maritime Strategy (Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press 2010).
   Google Scholar