Choosing the Right Sidekick: Economic Complements to US Military Grand Strategies

Bibliography

• Art, Robert J., A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘Selective Engagement in the Era of Austerity’, in Richard Fontaine and Kristin M. Lord (eds), America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration (Washington: Center for New American Security 2012), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Asher, David L., Victor D. Comras and Patrick M. Cronin, Pressure: Coercive Economic Statecraft and US National Security (Washington: Center for New American Security 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, David A., Economic Statecraft (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, David A., ‘Power Analysis and World Politics’, World Politics 31/2 (1979), 161–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckley, Michael, ‘China’s Century? Why America’s Edge Will Endure’, International Security 36/3 (2011/12), 41–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., American Force (New York: Columbia UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, Robert D. and Ashley J. Tellis, Revising US Grand Strategy toward China (Washington: Council on Foreign Relations 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G, G. John Ikenberry, and William C Wohlforth, ‘Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment’, International Security 37/3 (2012), 7–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G. and William C. Wohlforth, World out of Balance (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Industry and Security, ‘US Dual-Use Export Controls for China Need to Be Strengthened, Final Report’, No. IPE-17500, March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Edward Harllett, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (New York: St Martin’s Press 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Ashton, ‘Remarks on the Next Phase of the US Rebalance to the Asia–Pacific’, http://www.defense.gov/Speeches/Speech.aspx?SpeechID=1929.
   Google Scholar
• Caverley, Jonathan D., ‘United States Hegemony and the New Economics of Defense’, Security Studies 16/4 (2007), 598–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Richard, ‘Is “Economic Power” a Useful and Operational Concept?’, http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cooper/files/economic_power.pdf?m=1360039874.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin, Cletus C., ‘The Controversy over Free Trade’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 84/1 (2002), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert, ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science 2/3 (1957), 201–05.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Bob, ‘IMF warns of slower China growth unless Beijing speeds up reforms’, Wall Street Journal, 30 July 2014, http://www.wsj.com/articles/imf-annual-report-warns-of-slower-china-growth-unless-beijing-speeds-up-economic-reforms-1406768402.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Christina L., ‘Linkage Diplomacy: Economic and Security Bargaining in the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1902–23’, International Security 33/3 (2008/09), 143–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, Alan P., US Economic Statecraft for Survival 1933–1991 (New York: Routledge 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Dueck, Colin, Reluctant Crusaders (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, Ian F. and Paul K. Kerr, ‘US Export Control System and the President’s Reform Initiative’, CRS Report to Congress, 14 July 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Richard and Kristin M. Lord (eds), America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration (Washington: Center for New American Security 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Førland, Tor Egil, ‘“Economic Warfare” and “Strategic Goods”’, Journal of Peace Research 28/2 (1991), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., A Contest for Supremacy (New York: W.W. Norton 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, Eugene, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky, ‘Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation’, International Security 21/4 (1997), 5–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholz, Eugene, Daryl G. Press, and Benjamin Valentino, ‘Time to offshore our troops’, New York Times, 12 December 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/12/opinion/12press.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert, ‘The Theory of Hegemonic War’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18/4 (1988), 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert, US Power and the Multinational Corporation (New York: Basic Books 1975).
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, Joseph M., ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation’, International Organization 42/3 (1988), 485–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, Lloyd, Ruling the World (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Haass, Richard N. (ed.), Economic Sanctions and American Diplomacy (New York: Council on Foreign Relations 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Haass, Richard N. and Meghan L. O’Sullivan, Honey and Vinegar: Incentives, Sanctions, and Foreign Policy (Washington: Brookings Institute Press 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, Elhanan, ‘The Structure of Foreign Trade’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 13/2 (1999), 121–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Hont, Istvan, ‘Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics’, in John Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (New York: Cambridge UP 1990), 41–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, Kimberly Ann Elliott, and Barbara Oegg, Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd edn (Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, ‘America’s Imperial Ambition’, Foreign Affairs 81/5 (2002), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics 7/1 (2009), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, Robert, The World America Made (New York: Knopf 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Vintage 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., ‘Realism, Neorealism, and the Study of World Politics’, in Robert O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia UP 1986), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kerin, Roger A., P. Rajan Varadarajan, and Robert A. Peterson, ‘First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions’, Journal of Marketing 56/4 (1992), 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Dong Jung. ‘Cutting Off Your Nose? A Reigning Power’s Economic Response to a Military Challenger’, PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, Klaus, The War Potential of Nations (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R., Maurice Obstfeld, and Marc J. Melitz, International Economics, 9th edn (New York: Addison-Wesley 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, ‘From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing’, International Security 22/1 (1997), 86–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, ‘This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana’, International Studies Quarterly 56/1 (2012), 203–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, Marvin B. and David B. Montgomery, ‘First-Mover Advantages’, Strategic Management Journal 9/S1 (1988), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobell, Steven E., ‘Second Face of Security Strategies: Anglo-German and Anglo-Japanese Trade Concessions during the 1930s’, Security Studies 17/3 (2008), 438–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobell, Steven E., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Norrin M. Ripsman (eds), The Challenge of Grand Strategy (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, Robert, ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22/1 (1988), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lisa L., Coercive Cooperation (Princeton NJ: Princeton UP 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Mastanduno, Michael, Economic Containment (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 1992).
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, R. Preston, Hugo M. Mialon, and Michael A. Williams, ‘What Is a Barrier to Entry?’, American Economic Review 94/2 (2004), 461–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia’, Chinese Journal of International Politics 3/4 (2010), 381–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Imperial by Design’, National Interest 111 (January/February 2011), 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Reckless States and Realism’, International Relations 23/2 (2009), 241–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations, 3rd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson Murray, ‘Thoughts on Grand Strategy’, in Williamson Murray, Richard Hart Sinnreich, and James James Lacey (eds), The Shaping of Grand Strategy (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2011), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Norrlof, Carla, America’s Global Advantage (New York: Cambridge UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Jr, Joseph S., ‘The Case for Deep Engagement’, Foreign Affairs 74/4 (1995), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Jr, Joseph S., The Paradox of American Power (New York: Oxford UP 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Jr, Joseph S., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Paarlberg, Robert L., ‘Knowledge as Power: Science, Military Dominance, and US Security’, International Security 29/1 (2004), 122–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., ‘Soft Balancing against the United States’, International Security 30/1 (2005), 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., ‘It’s the occupation, stupid’, Foreign Policy, 18 October 2010, http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/10/18/its-the-occupation-stupid/.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, Henry M., ‘A Strategic Engagement: Strengthening US–Chinese Ties’, Foreign Affairs 87/5 (2008), 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, Minxin, China’s Trapped Transition (Cambridge MA: Harvard UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., Restraint: A New Foundation for US Grand Strategy (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R. and Andrew L. Ross, ‘Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy’, International Security 21/3 (1996/97), 5–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, Condoleezza, ‘Promoting the National Interest’, Foreign Affairs 79/1 (2000), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato, Sebastian and John Schuessler, ‘A Realist Foreign Policy for the United States’, Perspectives on Politics 9/4 (2011), 803–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua and Caitlin Talmadge, ‘Hegemony, Force Posture, and the Provision of Public Goods’, Security Studies 23/3 (2014), 548–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russett, Bruce and Harvey Starr, World Politics: The Menu for Choice (New York: Freeman 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, Susan L., China: Fragile Superpower (New York: Oxford UP 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Skålnes, Lars S., ‘Grand Strategy and Foreign Economic Policy: British Grand Strategy in the 1930s’, World Politics 50/4 (1998), 582–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steil, Benn and Robert E. Litan, Financial Statecraft (New Haven: Yale UP 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, Ashley J., Janice Bially, Christopher Layne, and Melissa McPherson, Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age (Santa Monica CA: RAND 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States (Cambridge MA: Blackwell 1990).
   Google Scholar
• US Census, ‘Trade in Goods with China’, http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html.
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera, Stephen, ‘Why Europe Matters, Why the Third World Doesn’t: American Grand Strategy after the Cold War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 13/2 (1990), 1–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., ‘The Case for Finite Containment: Analyzing US Grand Strategy’, International Security 14/1 (1989), 5–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., Taming American Power (New York: W.W. Norton 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N., ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security 25/1 (2000), 5–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, William C., The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Zoellick, Robert B., ‘Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?’, http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm.
   Google Scholar