Drone Strikes and Grand Strategy: Toward a Political Understanding of the Uses of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks in US Security Policy

Bibliography

• Art, Robert J., ‘Selective Engagement in the Era of Austerity,’ in Richard Fontaine and Kristin M. Lord (eds), America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration, eds. (Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security, May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J., ‘American Foreign Policy and the Fungibility of Force,’ Security Studies 5/4 (1996), 7–42.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, Christopher H. and Duncan Snidal, ‘Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,’ World Politics 41/2 (Jan. 1989), 143–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal, Madiha, ‘Drone Strikes and Anti-Americanism in Pakistan,’ The Brookings Institution, 7 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, Victor, ‘Homeland Security Chief: Global Terror Threat Has Entered “New Phase,”’ Voice of America, 11 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Jo and Scott Shane, ‘Secret “Kill List” Proves Test of Obama’s Principles and Will,’ The New York Times, 29 May 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html
   Google Scholar
• Bender, Jeremy, ‘Ian Bremmer: Here Come The Non-US Drones,’ Business Insider, 4 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Brian, ‘White House Steps Up Warnings About Terrorism on U.S. Soil,’ The Los Angeles Times, 18 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, David, ‘Induction and Deduction in International Relations: Squaring the Circle Between Theory and Evidence,’ International Studies Review (2016), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Dave, ‘ A Categorical Error: Rethinking ‘Drones’ as an Analytical Category for Security Policy,’ Lawfare blog, 24 April 2016 https://lawfareblog.com/categorical-error-rethinking-drones-analytical-category-security-policy
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Ashley, ‘The US and its UAVs: A Cost-Benefit Analysis,’ American Security Project, 24 July 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G., John Ikenberry, and William C. Wohlforth, ‘Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment,’ International Security 37/3 (Winter 2012/13), 7–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G. and William C. Wohlforth, ‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing,’ International Security 30/1 (Summer 2005), 72–108.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, Daniel, ‘The Limits of Counter-terrorism,’ Lawfare blog, 2 August 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, Daniel, ‘Why Drones Work,’ Foreign Affairs July/August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Charli, ‘Crunching Drone Death Numbers,’ Duck of Minerva, 18 August 2011, http://www.whiteoliphaunt.com/duckofminerva/2011/08/crunching-drone-death-numbers.html
   Google Scholar
• Carvin, Stephanie, ‘The Trouble with Targeted Killing,’ Security Studies 21/3 (2012), 529–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chiozza, Giacomo, Anti-Americanism and the American World Order (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Coll, Steve, ‘The Unblinking Stare: The Drone War in Pakistan,’ The New Yorker, 24 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Audrey Kurth, ‘The War on Terrorism: What Does it Mean to Win?,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 37/2 (February 2014), 174–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Audrey Kurth, ‘Why Drones Fail: When Tactics Drive Strategy,’ Foreign Affairs (July-August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Audrey Kurth, ‘U.S. Grand Strategy and Counterterrorism,’ Orbis (Spring 2012), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Lynn E. et al., ‘ Armed and Dangerous? UAVs and U.S. Security,’ RAND Corporation, 2014 http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR449.html
   Google Scholar
• Porta, Donatella della and Heinz-Gerhard Haupt, ‘Patterns of Radicalization in Political Activism: An Introduction,’ Social Science History 36/3 ( Fall 2012), 311–20.
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, Gen. David, ‘Drones Best Weapons We’ve Got for Accuracy, Control, Oversight; Critics Don’t Get It,’ defense.AOL.com, 15 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dickstein, Corey, ‘Armed U.S. Drones Begin Flying Out of Turkey Base,’ Stars and Stripes, 3 August 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, Janina, ‘The Informal Regulation of Drones and the Formal Legal Regulation of War,’ Ethics and International Affairs (2015) 29/1, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozier, Kimberley, ‘CIA Chief Nominee: Drones Only a Deterrent,’ The Associated Press, MSN.com, 7 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, Justin, ‘Have U.S. Drones Become a ‘Counterinsurgency Air Force’ For Our Allies?’ ProPublica, 27 November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, Amitai, ‘The Great Drones Debate,’ Military Review (March-April 2013), 2–13 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KZasIbQT2i4J:usacac.army.mil/CAC2/MilitaryReview/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20130430_art004.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Gareth and Mohamed Sahnoun, ‘The Responsibility to Protect,’ Foreign Affairs 81/6 (November-December 2002), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C. Christine et al., ‘You Say the Pakistanis All Hate the Drone War? Prove It,’ The Atlantic, 23 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C. Christine et al., ‘Pakistani Opposition to American Drone Strikes,’ Political Science Quarterly 129/1 (Spring 2014), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C. Christine, ‘The Problems with Studying Civilian Casualties from Drone Usage in Pakistan: What We Can’t Know,’ The Monkey Cage blog, 17 August 2011 http://themonkeycage.org/2011/08/the-problems-with-studying-civilian-casualties-from-drone-usage-in-pakistan-what-we-can%E2%80%99t-know/
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C. Christine, ‘ Ethical and Methodological Issues in Assessing Drones’ Civilian Impacts in Pakistan,’ The Monkey Cage blog, 6 October 2014 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/06/ethical-and-methodological-issues-in-assessing-drones-civilian-impacts-in-pakistan/
   Google Scholar
• Flashpoint, ‘Event Review – U.S. Drones Policy: Strategic Frameworks and Measuring Effects,’ American Security Project, 20 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Flournoy, Michele and Janine Davidson, ‘The Logic of U.S. Foreign Deployments,’ Foreign Affairs (July/August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Benjamin H., ‘Nobody Knows if Drone Strikes in Pakistan Work,’ The National Interest, 17 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, Josh, ‘Ex-DNI Rips Obama White House,’ Politico, 29 July 2011 http://www.politico.com/story/2011/07/ex-dni-rips-obama-white-house-060199
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, Eugene, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey Sapolsky, ‘Come Home, America: The Case for Restraint in the Face of Temptation,’ International Security 21/4 (Spring 1997), 5–48.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, Jack, ‘Drone Stories, the Secrecy System, and Public Accountability,’ Lawfare, 31 May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hackel, Joyce, ‘Drone Warfare: The Changing Face of U.S. Military Engagement,’ PRI’s The World, 25 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelton, Jacqueline L., ‘Drones: What Are They Good For?’ Parameters 42/4-43/1 (Winter-Spring 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Henning, Job C., ‘Embracing the Drone,’ The New York Times, 20 February 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Patrick B., ‘Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns,’ International Security 36/4 (2012), 47–79.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Patrick B. and Anoop K. Sarbahi, ‘The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan,’ International Studies Quarterly 60/1 (2016), 1–17 http://isq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/01/04/isq.sqv004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, Javier, ‘The Effectiveness of the Drone Campaign against Al Qaeda Central: A Case Study,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 37/1 (2014), 4–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, Jenna, ‘The Effectiveness of the Drone Campaign against Al Qaeda Central: A Case Study,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 37/1 (2014), 4–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, Jenna, ‘When Heads Roll: Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation,’ Security Studies 18/4 (2009), 719–55.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Jenna, ‘Missing The Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes,’ International Security 38/4 (Spring 2014), 7–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J. and Robert O. Keohane (eds), Anti-Americanisms in World Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Demand for International Regimes,’ International Organization 36/2 (Spring, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah and John Kaag, ‘The Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Contemporary Conflict: A Legal and Ethical Analysis,’ Polity 44/2 (April 2012), 260–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah and Micah Zenco, ‘The Next Drone Wars: Preparing for Proliferation,’ Foreign Affairs (March-April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, Matthew and Barry Pavel, ‘How to Deter Terrorism,’ The Washington Quarterly 35/2 (Spring 2012), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, ‘The China Challenge to U.S. Hegemony,’ Current History (January 2008), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S., ‘Counterfactuals, Causal Inference, and Historical Analysis,’ Security Studies, 24/3 (2015), 378–402.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir and Gerard Alexander, ‘Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is Not Pushing Back,’ International Security 30/1 (Summer 2005), 109–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Jennifer, ‘H-Diplo | ISSF Article Article Review 52 on “The Myth of Entangling Alliances“.’ International Security 39/4, 13 April 2016 https://issforum.org/articlereviews/52-entangling-alliances#_ftnref8
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, ‘The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences,’ Sociological Methods & Research 41/4, (November 2012), 570–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malenic, Marina and Daniel Wasserbly, ‘Pentagon Budget 2016: Authorisation Bill Would Add USD350 Million For UCLASS,’ IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly, 30 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzetti, Mark, ‘Use of Drones for Killings Risks a War Without End, Panel Concludes in Report,’ The New York Times, 26 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt, ‘Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad For International Relations,’ European Journal of International Relations 19/3 (September 2013), 427–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothana, Ibrahim, ‘How Drones Help al-Qaida,’ The New York Times, 13 June 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/14/opinion/how-drones-help-al-qaeda.html
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, Hussein, ‘How Drones Changed the Game in Pakistan,’ The National Interest, 3 August 2012 http://nationalinterest.org/how-drones-changed-the-game-pakistan-7290
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Peter R., ‘The Trouble with Radicalization,’ International Affairs 89/4 (2013), 873–93.
   Google Scholar
• Northam, Jackie, ‘Pakistan Says U.S. Drone Strikes Violate Its Sovereignty,’ NPR, 7 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, Kris, ‘General: Air Force Must Rebalance ISR for “Contested Environments,”’ Defensetech, 17 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert A., ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States,’ International Security 30/1 (Summer 2005), 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R. and Andrew L. Ross, ‘Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy,’ International Security 21/3 (Winter 1996-1997), 5–53.
   Google Scholar
• Preble, Christopher, The Power Problem: How American Military Dominance Makes Us Less Safe, Less Prosperous, and Less Free (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Nicholas J., Director, National Counterterrorism Center, ‘Current Terrorist Threat to the United States,’ hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 12 February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Room for Debate, ‘Do Drone Attacks Do More Harm Than Good?,’ The New York Times online, 25 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Russett, Bruce M., ‘The Young Science of International Politics,’ World Politics 22/1 (October 1969), 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sageman, Marc, Understanding Terror Networks (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Sarachan, Sydney, ‘Ask The Experts: Drones,’ PBS Need to Know, 14 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schiavenza, Matt, ‘Drones and the Myth of Precision,’ The Atlantic, 24 April 2015 http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/drones-and-the-myth-of-precision/391445/
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, Paul, ‘Going Off the Reservation Into the Sanctuary: Cross-Border Counterterrorist Operations, Fourth Generation Warfare and the Ethical Insufficiency of Contemporary Just War Thinking,’ in David Fisher and Brian Wicker (eds), Just War on Terror?: A Christian and Muslim Response (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, Jason and David Collier, ‘Glossary,’ in Henry E. Brady and David Collier (eds), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shane, Scott, ‘Elections Spur a Move to Codify U.S. Drone Policy,’ The New York Times, 24 November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, Scott, ‘The Moral Case for Drones,’ The New York Times, 14 July 2012.
   Google Scholar
• The Stimson Center, ‘Recommendations and Report of the Task Force on U.S. Drone Policy,’ 2nd edn, April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Mark, ‘Costly Flight Hours,’ Time, 2 April 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera, Stephen, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Cornell, NY: Cornell UP, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, Erik, ‘Is the Marginal Cost of a Drone Strike Too Low?,’ The Monkey Cage, 27 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Waheed, Sarah, ‘Drones, U.S. Propaganda and Imperial Hubris,’ Middle East Research and Information Project, 25 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘National Security Strategy of the United States,’ September 2002 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2002/
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, Vikash, ‘North Waziristan: Drones and Compellence,’ Duck of Minerva, 30 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zenko, Micah, ‘How Many Bombs Did The United States Drop In 2015?,’ Politics, Power, and Preventive Action, Council on Foreign Relations, January 7, 2016 http://blogs.cfr.org/zenko/2016/01/07/how-many-bombs-did-the-united-states-drop-in-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Zenko, Micah, ‘Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,’ Council on Foreign Relations Special Report No. 65, January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zenko, Micah, Between Threats and War: U.S. Discrete Military Operations in the Post-Cold War World (Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2010).
   Google Scholar