Is strategic studies narrow? Critical security and the misunderstood scope of strategy

Bibliography

• Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan, ‘Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? an Introduction’, Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan (eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory. Perspectives on and beyond Asia (1st ed. 2007) (London: Routledge 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mashat, Abdul-Monem, National Security in the Third World (Boulder: Westview Press 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Christon I., John R. Ferris, Holger H. Herwig, and Timothy H. Travers, World History of Warfare (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ardant Du Picq, Charles, ‘Battle Studies. Ancient and Modern Battle (1st ed. 1880)’, in Roots of Strategy, Book 2 (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, ‘Reason, Passion, and Power in the Thought of Clausewitz’, Social Research 39/4 (1972), 599–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, Penser La Guerre. Clausewitz (Paris: Gallimard 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, ‘Clausewitz et l’Etat’, Annales. Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 32/3 (1977), 1260–65.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, ‘‘The Evolution of Modern Strategic Thought (1945–1968)’ (1st ed. 1968)’, Raymond Aron (eds.), Politics and Society: Selected Essays (New York: The Free Press 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, Peace and War. A Theory of International Relations (1st ed. 1962) (Rutgers: Transaction 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Asada, Sadao, ‘Alfred T. Mahan: Navalist, Imperialist, and Racist’, Sadao Asada (ed.), Culture Shock and Japanese-American Relations: Historical Essays (Columbia: University of Missouri Press 2007), 53–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoob, Mohammed, The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System (Boulder: Lynne Rienner 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Azar, Edward E. and Chung-in Moon, ‘Legitimacy, Integration and Policy Capacity: The “Software” Side of Third World National Security’, Edward E. Azar and Chung-in Moon (eds.), National Security in the Third World: The Management of Internal and External Threats (Aldershot: Edward Elgar 1988), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, F. G., Stratagems and Spoils. A Social Anthropology of Politics (New York: Shocken Books 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Bajpai, Kanti, Saira Basit, and V. Krishnappa (eds.), India’s Grand Strategy. History, Theory, Cases (London: Routledge 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D A., ‘The Power of Positive Sanctions’, World Politics 24 (1971), 19–38. doi:10.2307/2009705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, David, ‘Thinking about Threats’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 15/1 (1971), 71–78. doi:10.1177/002200277101500106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak, Globalization and War (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak and Shane Brighton, ‘Absent War Studies? War, Knowledge, and Critique’, Hew Strachan and Sybille Scheipers (eds.), The Changing Character of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011), 524–41.
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak and Mark Laffey, ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’, Review of International Studies 32/2 (2006), 329–38. doi:10.1017/S0260210506007054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak and Keith Stanski (eds.), Orientalism and War (New York: Columbia University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak, 'Decolonising war', European Journal of International Security 1/2 (2016), 199–214 doi: 10.1017/eis.2016.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, J. Samuel, Realist Constructivism. Rethinking International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Barua, Pradeep P., The Military Effectiveness of Post-Colonial States (Leiden: Brill 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Basrur, Rajesh M., Minimum Deterrence and India’s Nuclear Security (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bassford, Christopher, Clausewitz in English. the Reception of Clausewitz in Britain and America, 1815–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, John and James J. Wirtz, ‘Strategy in the Contemporary World: Strategy after 9/11ʹ’, John Baylis, James J. Wirtz, and Colin S. Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, John, James J. Wirtz, and Colin S. Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Beaufre, André, Introduction to Strategy (1st ed. 1963) (New York: Praeger 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Beaufre, André, Deterrence and Strategy (1st ed. 1964) (London: Faber 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Beaufre, André, La Stratégie De L’action (1st ed. 1966) (La Tour d’Aigues: Éditions de l’Aube 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘Should Strategic Studies Survive?’, World Politics 50/1 (1997), 7–33. doi:10.1017/S0043887100014702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘Is Strategy an Illusion?’, International Security 25/2 (2000), 5–50. doi:10.1162/016228800560444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K., ‘The Soft Underbelly of American Primacy: Tactical Advantages of Terror’, Political Science Quarterly 117/1 (2002), 19–36. doi:10.2307/798092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, David, Carnage and Connectivity. Landmarks in the Decline of Conventional Military Power (London: Hurst 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pinar, Regional Security in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective (London: Routledge 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pinar, ‘The ‘Western-Centrism’ of Security Studies: ‘Blind Spot’ or Constitutive Practice?’, Security Dialogue 41/6 (2010), 615–22. doi:10.1177/0967010610388208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pinar, ‘Security in the Arab World and Turkey: Differently Different’, in Arlene B. Tickner and David L. Blaney (edited by), Thinking International Relations Differently (London: Routledge 2012), 24–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pinar, The International in Security, Security in the International (London: Routledge 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Mia, Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror (New York: Columbia University Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Ken, Strategy and Ethnocentrism (London: Croom Helm 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Ken, ‘Critical Explorations’, Ken Booth (ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Ken, Theory of World Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, Philippe, (ed.), Security. Dialogue Across Disciplines (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, Shannon, Laura Lima, and João Nunes (eds.), Critical Theory in International Relations and Security Studies. Interviews and Reflections (London: Routledge 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace 1946).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, Strategy in the Missile Age (1st ed. 1959) (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Bernard, ‘Why Were We So (Strategically) Wrong?’, Foreign Policy 5/1971–72 151–61.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher S., and Matt Mcdonald, ‘The Future of Critical Security: Ethics and the Politics of Security’’, European Journal of International Relations 19/2 (2011), 235–55. doi:10.1177/1354066111419538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley, ‘Strategic Studies and Its Critics’, World Politics 20/4 (1968), 593–605. doi:10.2307/2009685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, Peter (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies (London: Routledge 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, People, States and Fear (Brighton: Wheatsheaf 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen, The Evolution of International Security Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap De Wilde, Security (Boulder: Lynne Rienner 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Callwell, Charles E., Small Wars. Their Principles and Practice (1st ed. 1896) (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Chaliand, Gérard, (ed.), The Art of War in World History. From Antiquity to the Nuclear Age (1st ed. 1990) (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Charnay, Jean-Paul, Essai général de stratégie (Paris: Editions Champ Libre 1973).
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, Erica and Adria Lawrence (eds.), Rethinking Violence: States and Non-State Actors in Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, Erica and Maria J. Stephan, Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict (New York, NY: Columbia University Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, Carl von, ‘From the ‘Political Declaration’ (1812)’, Carl Von Clausewitz (ed.), Historical and Political Writings (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1992), 285–303.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, David and John Gerring (eds.), Concepts and Method in Social Science. the Tradition of Giovanni Sartori (London: Routledge 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Alan, Contemporary Security Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Colson, Bruno, Clausewitz (Paris: Perrin 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Coram, Robert, Boyd. The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War (Boston: Little, Brown and Company 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Coutau-Bégarie, Hervé, Traité de stratégie (1st ed. 1999) (Paris: Economica 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Martha, ‘The Logic of Terrorism: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Strategic Choice’, Walter Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism. Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press-Johns Hopkins University Press 1990), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, Michel and Erhard Friedberg, Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action (1st ed. 1977) (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Cru, Jean Norton, War Books: A Study in Historical Criticism (Partial Translation of Témoins, 1st ed 1929) (San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Daase, Christopher, ‘Clausewitz and Small Wars’, Hew Strachan and Andreas Herberg-Rothe (eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007), 182–95.
   Google Scholar
• Daase, Christopher and James W. Davis (eds.), Clausewitz on Small War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, Simon, ‘Contesting an Essential Concept: Reading the Dilemmas in Contemporary Security Discourse’, Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams (eds), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Dannreuther, Roland, International Security: The Contemporary Agenda (Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley & Sons 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Davis Jr., James W., Threats and Promises. The Pursuit of International Influence (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, Michel, Sociologie des crises politiques (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, Robert, The Strategist. The Life and Times of Thomas Schelling (Hollis: Hollis Publishing 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, Myriam and Victor Maurer, (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies (London: Routledge 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, Isabelle, Clausewitz and African War. Politics and Strategy in Liberia and Somalia (London: Frank Cass 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, Antulio J., ‘On the Clausewitz of the Cold War: Reconsidering the Primacy of Policy in on War’, Armed Forces and Society 34/1 (2007), 90–108. doi:10.1177/0095327X06294175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria, II J. Antulio, ‘Clausewitz and the Nature of the War on Terror’, Hew Strachan and Andreas Herberg-Rothe (eds.), Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007), 196–218.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, II J. Antulio, Clausewitz and Contemporary War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Enthoven, Alain C. and K. Wayne Smith, How Much Is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961–1969 (1st ed. 1971) (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, Paul, et al. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality (Chicago: Chicago University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, Karin M., Critical Approaches to International Security (London: Polity 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Colin, Clausewitz’s Timeless Trinity. A Framework for Modern War (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence (ed.), Strategic Coercion. Concepts and Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity Press 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, Strategy. A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Erhard, Local Orders: The Dynamics of Organized Action (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, Diego (ed.), Making Sense of Suicide Missions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, Diego, Codes of the Underworld. How Criminals Communicate (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, Marshall, Why David Sometimes Win: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, John, ‘Strategic Studies and Its Assumptions’, John Baylis, Ken Booth, John Garnett, and Phil Williams (eds.), Contemporary Strategy: I Theories and Concepts (1st ed. 1975) (London: Holmer and Meier 1987), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, P. K., One Hundred Years of Kautilya’s Arthasastra (New Delhi: IDSA Monograph Series 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., Simon, W. E., (eds.), The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy (1st ed. 1971) (Boulder, CO: Westview Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Ghamari-Tabrizi, Sharon, The Worlds of Herman Kahn. The Intuitive Science of Thermonuclear War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Giustozzi, Antonio, The Art of Coercion. The Primitive Accumulation and Management of Coercive Power (London: Hurst 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving, Strategic Interaction (Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., ‘What RAND Hath Wrought’, Foreign Policy 4 (1971), 111–29. doi:10.2307/1147739
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Strategic Studies: A Critical Assessment (London: Aldwych Press 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Modern Strategy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., ‘The Strategic Anthropologist’, International Affairs 89/5 (2013), 1285–95. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Philip, Deadly Logic. The Theory of Nuclear Deterrence (1st ed. 1966) (New York: Schocken Books 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill, Kelly, Weapons of Mass Migration: Force Displacement, Coercion and Foreign Policy (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Guevara, Ernesto Che, The African Dream. The Diaries of the Revolutionary War in the Congo (New York: Grove Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hahlweg, Werner, ‘Clausewitz and Guerrilla Warfare’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 9/2–3 (1986), 127–33. doi:10.1080/01402398608437262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Grant T., The Mind of War. John Boyd and American Security (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Handel, Michael I., Masters of War (London: Frank Cass 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Victor Davis (ed.), Makers of Ancient Strategy. From the Persian Wars to the Fall of Rome (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Harkavy, Robert E. and Stephanie G. Neuman, Warfare and the Third World (Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Harrotunian, H. D., ‘Late Tokugawa Culture and Thought’, in Marius B. Jansen (ed.), The Emergence of Meiji Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995), 116–37.
   Google Scholar
• Herberg-Rothe, Andreas, Clausewitz’s Puzzle: The Political Theory of War (1st ed. 2001) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Herberg-Rothe, Andreas, ‘Clausewitz’s Concept of the State’, Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Jan Willem Honig, and Daniel Moran (eds.), Clausewitz, the State and War (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, The Evolution of Strategy. Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, ‘Small Wars in the Age of Clausewitz: The Watershed between Partisan War and People’s War’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 33/1 (2010), 139–62. doi:10.1080/01402391003603623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice ed., The Strategy Makers: Thoughts on War and Society from Machiavelli and Clausewitz (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger-ABC-Clio 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O., The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O., Journeys toward Progress. Studies of Economic Policy-Making in Latin America (New York: The Twentieth Century Fund 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, John M., The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Western International Theory, 1760–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hough, Peter, Shahin Malik, Andrew Moran, and Bruce Pilbeam, International Security Studies. Theory and Practice (London: Routledge 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Michael, ‘The Strategic Approach to International Relations’, (1st ed. 1976) in Michael Howard (eds.), The Causes of Wars and other essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983), 36–48
   Google Scholar
• Hynek, Nik and David Chandler, ‘No Emancipatory Alternative, No Critical Security Studies’’, Critical Studies on Security 1/1 (2013), 46–63. doi:10.1080/21624887.2013.790202
   Google Scholar
• Imlay, Talbot C., Toft, Monica Duffy, (eds.), The Fog of Peace and War Planning. Military and Strategic Planning under Uncertainty (London: Routledge 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Robert, Dangerous Knowledge. Orientalism and Its Discontents (1st ed. 2006) (Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Jardini, David, Thinking through the Cold War: RAND, National Security and Domestic Policy, 1945–1975 (Los Gatos, CA: Smashwords 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, James M., Getting Your Way. Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, ‘Security Studies: Ideas, Policy, and Politics’, Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson (eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University 2004), 100–26.
   Google Scholar
• Job, Brian, (ed.), The (In)Security Dilemma: National Security of Third World States (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair Ian, ‘Cultural Realism and Strategy in Maoist China’, Peter Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security (New York, NY: Columbia University Press 1996), 216–68.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair Ian, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair Ian, ‘What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?’, Annual Review of Political Science 15 (2012), 53–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.040908.120058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Wyn, Richard, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, François, A Treatise on Efficacy: Between Western and Chinese Thinking (1st ed. 1996) (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kaempf, Sebastian, ‘Lost through Non-Translation: Bringing Clausewitz’s Writings on ‘New Wars’ Back In’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 22/4 (2011), 548–73. doi:10.1080/09592318.2011.599164
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, Kimberly, The Eye of Command (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Herman, On Thermonuclear War (1st ed. 1960) (New York: The Free Press 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary, New & Old Wars (1st. ed. 1999) (London: Polity 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary, ‘Inconclusive Wars: Is Clausewitz Still Relevant in These Global Times?’, Global Policy 1/3 (2010), 271–81. doi:10.1111/gpol.2010.1.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, David C., ‘International Relations Theory and East Asian History: An Overview’, Journal of East Asian Studies 13/2 (2013), 181–205. doi:10.1017/S1598240800003908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangle, R. P., The Kautilya Arthasastra, Part II, Translation with Critical and Explanatory Notes (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Paul S. Dangerous Deterrent. Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia (1st ed. 2007) (Singapore: NUS Press 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Paul and Sumit Ganguly, India, Pakistan, and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia (New York: Columbia University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, William W., ‘The Requirements of Deterrence’, William W. Kaufman (ed.), Military Policy and National Security (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Feroz, Eating Grass. The Making of the Pakistani Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kinross, Stuart, Clausewitz and America. Strategic Thought and Practice from Vietnam to Iraq (London: Routledge 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kittrie, Orde. F., Lawfare. Law as a Weapon of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Bradley S., Strategic Studies and World Order. The Global Politics of Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Keith, ‘Insecurity and State Formation in the Global Military Order: The Middle Eastern Case’, European Journal of International Relations 2/3 (1996), 319–54. doi:10.1177/1354066196002003002
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Keith, ‘Critical Theory and Security Studies: The Research Programme of ‘Critical Security Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict 33/3 (1998), 298–333. doi:10.1177/0010836798033003004
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Keith and Michael C. Williams (eds), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Keith and Michael C. Williams, ‘From Strategy to Security: Foundations of Critical Security Studies’, Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams (eds.), Critical Security Studies. Concepts and Cases (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1997), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklick, Bruce, Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Laffey, Mark and Jutta Weldes, ‘Decolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis’’, International Studies Quarterly 52/3 (2008), 555–77. doi:10.1111/isqu.2008.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay, General Curtis E, (with Major General Dale O. Smith), America Is In Danger (New York: Funk & Wagnalls 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Little, Daniel, Varieties of Social Explanation. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science (Boulder, CO: Westview Press 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, Edward N., Strategy. The Logic of War and Peace (1st ed. 1987) (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas (ed.), Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., ‘Strategic Theory’, John Baylis, James J. Wirtz, and Colin S. Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G. and Dan Blumenthal, (eds.), Strategy in Asia. The Past, Present, and Future of Regional Security (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Zeev, ‘Power, Capabilities, and Paradoxical Conflict Outcomes’, World Politics 41 (2) (1989), 239–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Mary and Taylor Owen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Human Security (London: Routledge 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama, Masao, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1st ed. 1952) (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press 1974).
   Google Scholar
• McMaster, H. R., Dereliction of Duty. Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies that Led to Vietnam (1st ed. 1997) (New York: Harper Perennial 1998).
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Michael S., ‘On Hirschman, Schelling and Sen: Revising the Concept of the Self’, The Partisan Review 51/4 (1984), 238–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mead Earle, Edward, (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy. Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler (1st ed. 1943) (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John and Stephen M. Walt, ‘Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 19 (3) (2013), 427–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Steven E., ‘The Hegemonic Illusion? Traditional Strategic Studies In Context’, Security Dialogue 41/6 (2010), 639–48. doi:10.1177/0967010610388212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki, Mike, ‘Japan’s Search for Strategy’, International Security 8/3 (1983–84), 152–79. doi:10.2307/2538703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, Daniel, ‘Late Clausewitz’, Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Jan Willem Honig, and Daniel Moran (eds.), Clausewitz, the State and War (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2011), 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Patrick, Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis (London: Sage 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Mutimer, David, ‘Beyond Strategy: Critical Thinking on the New Security Studies’, Craig A. Snyder (ed.), Contemporary Security and Strategy (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan 2011), 45–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mutimer, David, ‘Critical Security Studies: A Schismatic History’, Alan Collins (ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 68–69.
   Google Scholar
• Narang, Vipin, Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, Peter R. and M.L.R. Smith, The Strategy of Terrorism: How It Works and Why It Fails (London: Routledge 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ning, Li, ‘Military Specialists and Military Treatises’, Yan Wenming (ed.), The History of Chinese Civilization. Volume I Earliest Times-221 B.C.E. (1st ed. 2006) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012), 526–37.
   Google Scholar
• Noulens, Thierry, ‘Clausewitz Et La Guerre Révolutionnaire’, Laure Bardiès and Martin Motte (eds.), De La Guerre? Clausewitz et la pensée stratégique contemporaine (Paris: Economica-Bibliothèque stratégique 2008), 433–52.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Barry, Honor, Symbols, and War (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Oki, Takeshi, ‘Clausewitz in the 21st Century Japan’, Reiner Pommerin (ed.), Clausewitz Goes Global. Carl Von Clausewitz in the 21st Century (Berlin: Carola Hartmann Miles Verlag 2011), 203–09.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert, Bombing to Win. Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Pape, Robert, Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (New York: Random House 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Paret, Peter, Clausewitz and the State: The Man, His Theories, and His Times (1st ed. 1976) (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Paret, Peter (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Paret, Peter, ‘Clausewitz’s Politics’, Peter Paret (ed.), Understanding War. Essays on Clausewitz and the History of Military Power (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, Columba, ‘Strategic Studies and Its Critics’, John Baylis, James J. Wirtz, and Colin S. Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), 352–54.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, Columba and Nick Vaughan-Williams, Critical Security Studies: An Introduction (London: Routledge 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Perkovich, George, India’s Nuclear Bomb. The Impact on Global Proliferation (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, Daniel and Gerard F. Powers (eds.), Strategies of Peace. Transforming Conflict in a Violent World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Picaud-Monnerat, Sandrine, ‘La Petite Guerre Selon Clausewitz, À Travers Sa Réflexion Sur La Guerre D’avant-Postes’, Laure Bardiès and Martin Motte (eds.), De la guerre? Clausewitz et la pensée stratégique contemporaine (Paris: Economica-Bibliothèque stratégique 2008), 405–32.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, Lucien, Essais De Stratégie Théorique (Paris: Fondation pour les Etudes de Défense Nationale 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, Lucien, Stratégie Théorique II (Paris: Economica-Bibliothèque stratégique 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, Lucien, ‘Préface’, Charles-Philippe David (ed.), Les études stratégiques. Approches et concepts (Montréal: Editions du Méridien 1989), ix–xxix.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, Lucien, Le Chantier stratégique. Entretiens avec gérard chaliand (Paris: Hachette-Pluriel 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Patrick, Military Orientalism: Eastern War through Western Eyes (New York: Columbia University Press 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival 35/1 (1993), 27–47. doi:10.1080/00396339308442672
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, Anatol, Strategy and Conscience (1st ed. 1964) (New York: Schocken Books 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Robin, Ron, The Making of the Cold War Enemy. Culture and Politics in the Military-Intellectual Complex (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Robin, Ron, The Cold World They Made. The Strategic Legacy of Roberta and Albert Wholstetter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Romilly, Jacqueline de, The Mind of Thucydides (1st ed. 1956) (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen P., Societies and Military Power: India and Its Armies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rosinski, Herbert, The German Army (1st ed. 1939) (New York: Praeger 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Said, Edward W., Orientalism (1st ed. 1978) (New York: Vintage Books 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Richard J., Securing Japan. Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Anne E., Deterrence by Diplomacy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., ‘Arms Control: Proposal for a Special Surveillance Force’, World Politics 13/1 (1960), 1–18. doi:10.2307/2009260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., ‘Strategic Problems of an International Armed Force’, International Organization 17/2 (1963), 465–85. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Micromotives and Macrobehavior (1st ed. 1978) (New York: W.W. Norton 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Strategies of Commitment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., ‘Foreword’, Robert V. Dodge (ed.), Schelling’s Game Theory. How to Make Decisions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C. and Morton H. Halperin, Strategy and Arms Control (1st ed. 1961) (Washington, D.C.: A Pergamon-Brassey’s Classic 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Scheipers, Sibylle, ''The most beautiful of wars': Carl von Clausewitz and small wars', European Journal of International Security 2/1 (2016), 47–63. doi: 10.1017/eis.2016.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Emile, War from the Ground Up. Twenty-First-Century Combat as Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, Laura, Gendering Global Conflict. Toward a Feminist Theory of War (New York: Columbia University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, Laura and Jessica L. Peet, ‘Targeting Civilians in War: Feminist Contributions’, J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg (eds.), Feminism and International Relations: Conversation about the Past, Present and Future (New York: Routledge 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Edward N., ‘The Influence and Use of Chinese Classical Military Philosophy in the Writings of Mao Zedong’, Journal of Chinese Military History 3/1 (2014), 47–70. doi:10.1163/22127453-12341260
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hugh, ‘The Womb of War: Clausewitz and International Politics’, Review of International Studies 16/1 (1990), 39–58. doi:10.1017/S026021050011263X
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. R., Fighting for Ireland? The Military Strategy of the Irish Republican Movement (1st ed. 1995) (London: Routledge 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. R., ‘Strategy in an Age of ‘Low-Intensity’ Warfare: Why Clausewitz Is Still More Relevant than His Critics’, in Isabelle Duyvesteyn and Jan Angstrom (eds), Rethinking the Nature of War (New York: Frank Cass 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve, ‘The Contested Concept of Security’, Ken Booth (ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Barry H., Bernard Brodie and the Foundations of American Nuclear Strategy (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, Clausewitz’s On War: A Biography (New York: Grove Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew, The Direction of War. Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, Christine (ed.), Experiencing War (London: Routledge 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Summers, G. Harry Jr. On Strategy. A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War (1st ed. 1982) (New York: Dell 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, Christine, War as Experience: Contributions from International Relations and Feminist Analysis (London: Routledge 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, Christine (ed.), Masquerades of War (London: Routledge 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge, Caitlin, The Dictator’s Army. Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, James T., ‘Threats and Promises’, Paul Swingle (ed.), The Structure of Conflict (New York: Academic Press 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Tien, Chen-Ya, Chinese Military Theory, Ancient and Modern (1st ed. 1992) (Singapore: Horizon Books 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, History and Strategy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Vennesson, Pascal, “War without the people”. Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds.), The Changing Character Of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011), 241–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vennesson, Pascal, ‘Les études stratégiques sont-elles rationalistes et matérialistes?’, Revue Etudes Internationales 46/2–3 (2015), 231–52. doi:10.7202/1035179ar
   Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole, ‘The History and Social Structure of Security Studies as a Practico-Academic Field’, Trine Villumsen Berling and Christian Bueger (eds.), Security Expertise. Practice, Power, Responsibility (London: Routledge 2015), 76–106.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, Thomas, War, Clausewitz and the Trinity (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen S., ‘The Renaissance of Security Studies’, International Studies Quarterly 35/2 (1991), 211–39. doi:10.2307/2600471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westmoreland, General William C., A Soldier Reports (1st ed. 1976) (New York: Dell 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Paul D. (ed.), Security Studies. An Introduction (London: Routledge 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, William C., ‘Realism’, Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Shang-Su. The Defence Capabilities of Small States. Singapore and Taiwan’s Responses to Strategic Desperation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Tiejun, ‘The Western Master and Bible of War: Clausewitz and His ‘On War’ in China’, Reiner Pommerin (ed.), Clausewitz Goes Global. Carl Von Clausewitz in the 21st Century (Berlin: Carola Hartmann Miles Verlag 2011), 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, Derek M. C., Deciphering Sun Tzu. How to Read the Art of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayse, After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zarate, Juan, Treasury’s War (New York: Public Affairs 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Shu Guang, Mao’s Military Romanticism. China and the Korean War, 1950–1953 (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas 1995).
   Google Scholar