The failure of defense planning in European Post-Communist Defense Institutions: ascertaining causation and determining solutions

Bibliography

• Akubardia, Teona., ‘Overview of the Legislation Facilitating the Civil Democratic Oversight of Armed Forces in Georgia’, in Tamara Pataraia (ed.), Democratic Control over the Georgian Armed Forces since the August 2008 War (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Barnay, Zolton D., The Future of NATO Expansion: Four Case Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bebler, Anton Alex., ‘Civil-Military Relations in Slovenia’, in Constantine P. Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker (eds.), Civil-Military Relations in the Soviet and Yugoslav Successor States(Boulder CO: Westview Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Betz, David J., ‘Civil-Military Relations in the Czech Republic: Ambivalent Reformers, Immature Structures’, in Natalie Mychajlyszyn and Harald von Riekhoff (eds.), The Evolution of Civil-Military Relations in East-Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union (Westport CT: Praeger 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Betz, David J., Civil-Military Relations in Russia and Eastern Europe (New York: Routledge Curzon 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bystrova, Iryna., ‘Defence Planning in the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine: Decade of Attempts and Mistakes,’ M.A. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Csiki, Tamás., ‘Lessons Learnt and Unlearnt. Hungary’s 15 Years in NATO’, in Robert Czulda and Madej Marek (eds.), Newcomers No More? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspectives of “Post-Cold War” Members (Warsaw: International Relations Research Institute 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Czech Republic, The White Paper on Defence (Prague: Ministry of Defence 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Darchiashvili, David., ‘Georgian Defence Policy and Military Reform’, in Bruno Coppieters and Robert Legvold (eds.), Statehood and Security: Georgia after the Rose Revolution (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Darchiashvili, David., ‘Defence Reform and the Caucasus: Challenges of Institutional Reform during Unresolved Conflict’, Mediterranean Quarterly 20/3 ( Summer 2009), 19–39. doi:10.1215/10474552-2009-012
   Google Scholar
• Djurdjevic-Lukic, Svetlana., ‘Defence Reform in Serbia/Serbia and Montenegro: Hampering Exceptionalism’, in Philipp H. Fluri and George Katsirdakis (eds.), Security Sector Reform in the New Partnership for Peace Members: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia (Geneva: The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Dunay, Pál., Timothy Edmunds, and Andrew Cottey, ‘The Half-Hearted Transformation of the Hungarian Military’, in Timothy Edmunds, Andrew Cottey, and Anthony Forster (eds.), Civil-Military Relations in Post-Communist Europe: Reviewing the Transition (London: Rutledge 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Dyčka, Lukas and Miroslav Mareš, ‘The Development and Future of Fighter Planes Acquisitions in Countries of the Visegrad Group’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 25/4 (2012), 533–57. doi:10.1080/13518046.2012.730370
   Google Scholar
• Estonia, ‘Effectiveness of Formation, Maintenance and Replenishment of Resources Required for Increasing Military Capability and Mobilisation of Defence Forces from 2009-2012. Summary of Report (Tallinn: National Audit Office 30 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Estonia, ‘National Defence Development Plan, 2013-2022ʹ (Tallinn: Ministry of Defence n.d.).
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, Antje., ‘Security Sector Governance in Georgia (I): Status’, in Philipp H. Fluri and Eden Cole (eds.), From Revolution to Reform: Georgia’s Struggle with Democratic Institution Building and Security Sector Reform (Vienna: Bureau for Security Policy at the Austrian Ministry of Defence; National Defence Academy, and Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces in co-operation with PfP-Consortium of Defence Academies and Security Studies InstitutesJuly 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Furlan, Branimir., ‘Civilian Control and Military Effectiveness: Slovenian Case’, Armed Forces and Society 39/3(2012), 434–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgia, National Military Strategy 2005 (T’bilisi: Ministry of Defence 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, Law on Defence Planning, No. 4130 (T’bilisi : Legislative Herald of Georgia 28 April 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, Manual Planning and Control: PPBS/FMS (T’bilisi: Ministry of Defence 9 March 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, Georgia: Advancing towards NATO. (T'bilisi: Ministry of Defence 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, National Security Concept of Georgia (T’bilisi: Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, Minister’s Vision, 2013-2014 (T’bilisi: Ministry of Defence 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, Strategic Defence Review, 2013-2016 (T’bilisi: Ministry of Defence 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia, The White Book 2014: The Annual Report on the Activities of the Ministry of Defence of Georgia (T’bilisi: Ministry of Defence n.d.).
   Google Scholar
• Gogolewska, Agnieszka., ‘Problems Confronting Civilian Democratic Control in Poland’, in Hans Born, Marina Caparini, Karl W. Haltiner, and Jürgen Kuhlmann (eds.), Civil-Military Relations in Europe: Learning from Crisis and Institutional Change (New York: Routledge 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Hitch, Charles Johnston., Decision-Making for Defence (Berkeley: University of California Press 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Colby and Ruslan Pukhov, (eds.), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine (Minneapolis: East View Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kosianchuk, Vitaliy., ‘Cobb-Douglas Production Function as an Approach for Better Resource Allocation in the Ukrainian Armed Forces,’ M.A. Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Robert L., ‘The Enemy Within: Russia’s Military Withdrawal from Georgia’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 17/3 (2004), 405–24. doi:10.1080/13518040490486124
   Google Scholar
• Macedonia, White Paper on Defence (Skopje: Ministry of Defence December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Majer, Marian., ‘Slovakia’, in Marian Majer (ed.), Security Sector Reform in Countries of Visegrad and Southern Caucasus: Challenges and Opportunities (Bratislava: Centre for European and North Atlantic Affairs (CENAA) 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Männik, Eric., ‘Development of the Estonian Defence: Finnish Assistance’, Baltic Defence Review 1/7(2002), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Manole, Oana-Raluca., ‘PPBES Process Overview: Considerations regarding Its Implementation and Use’, in Maria Constantinescu (ed.), Planning, Programming, Budgeting, Evaluation System: Benefits and Challenges Workshop unfolded during the postgraduate course in Planning Programming Budgeting System (Bucharest: National Defence University ‘Carol I’ Publishing House 2010).
   Google Scholar
• McNab, Robert M., ‘Implementing Program Budgeting in the Serbian Ministry of Defence’, Public Budgeting and Finance 31/2/(Summer (2011), 216–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mileshko, Roman., ‘The Evolution of the Defence Budget Process in Ukraine, 1991-2006,’ M.A. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mölder, Holger., ‘The Development of Military Cultures’, in Tony Lawrence and Tomas Jermalavičius (eds.), Apprenticeship, Partnership, Membership: Twenty Years of Defence Development in the Baltic States (Tallinn: International Centre for Defence Studies 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Naď, Jaroslav, Marian Majer, and Šuplata. Milan, 75 Solutions for Slovakia’s Defence (Bratislava: Central European Policy Institute, ca 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Paor, Jozsef., ‘The Resource, Cost and Budget Planning Sub-Systems in the Defence Planning Process’, in Maria Constantinescu (ed.), Planning, Programming, Budgeting, Evaluation System: Benefits and Challenges, Workshop unfolded during the postgraduate course in Planning Programming Budgeting System. (Bucharest: National Defence University ‘Carol I’ Publishing House 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Paszewski, Tomasz., ‘Can Poland Defend Itself?’, Survival 58/2 (April–May 2016), 117–33. doi;10.1080/00396338.2016.1161907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulauskas, Kęstutis., ‘The Baltic Quest to the West: From Total Defence to “Smart Defence” (And Back?)’, in Tony Lawrence and Tomas Jermalavičius (eds.), Apprenticeship, Partnership, Membership: Twenty Years of Defence Development in the Baltic States (Tallinn: International Centre for Defence Studies 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pedchenko, H., ‘Strategic Planning in Ukraine: Content and Challenges Related to Its Realization in the Ministry of Defence of the [Sic] Ukraine’, in Defence Bulletin No. 5 (Kyiv: Defence and Security Policy Centre 2010), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pietras, Marek., ‘Poland’s Participation in NATO Operations’, in Janne Haaland Matlary and Magnus Petersson (eds.), NATO’s European Allies: Military Capability and Political Will (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pkhaladze, Tengiz and Alexander Rondeli, ‘Georgia’, in Marian Majer (ed.), Security Sector Reform in Countries of Visegrad and Southern Caucasus: Challenges and Opportunities (Bratislava: Centre for European and North Atlantic Affairs (CENAA 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Poland, White Paper (Warsaw: Ministry of National Defence 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Vision of the Polish Armed Forces 2030 (Warsaw: Ministry of National Defence May 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Defence Strategy of the Republic of Poland: Sector Strategy of the National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (Warsaw: Ministry of National Defence 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Poland, White Book on National Security of the Republic of Poland (Warsaw: The National Security Bureau 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Praks, Henrik., ‘Estonia and NATO: Back to Basics after a Decade of Membership’, in Robert Czulda and Madej. Marek (eds.), Newcomers No More? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspectives of ‘Post-Cold War’ Members  (Warsaw: International Relations Research Institute 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, Jack., ‘PPBS: Theory, Structure, and Limitations’, in Robert T. Golembiewski (ed.), Public Budgeting and Finance 4th ed. (New York: Marcel Dekker 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Romania, ‘‘Law on Defence Planning’, No. 473 of 04 November 2004; Repeals Government Ordinance No.52/1998 on National Defence Planning,’ Monitorul Oficial Bucharest, No.525, 25 October 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Romania, ‘Strategy of Transformation of Romanian Armed Forces’, in Signed by State Secretaries for Euro-Atlantic Integration and Defence Policy, and Armament, and Chief of General Staff; Approved by the Secretary General of the Ministry of National Defence (Bucharest: General Staff 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Deborah., ‘Ukraine’s Military Reform: Building a Paradigm Army’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 21/4 (2008), 599–614. doi:10.1080/13518040802497341
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, James J., ‘The Origins of Soviet Military Science’, The Journal of Soviet Military Studies 2/4 (1989), 491–519. doi:10.1080/13518048908429962
   Google Scholar
• Sequin, Barre R., ‘Why Did Poland Choose the F-16s?’ Occasional Papers Series No. 11, (Garmisch-Partenkirchen: George C. Marshall Center June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Serbia, ‘Defence Reform—Current Results’, Southeast Europe Clearinghouse Meeting Bucharest (Belgrade: Ministry of Defense December 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Serbia, Strategic Defence Review: Final (Belgrade: Ministry of Defence July 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Serbia and Montenegro, Ministerial Guidance for the Year 2006 (Belgrade: Federal Ministry of Defence, Sector for Defence Policy 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Seroka, Jim., ‘Serbian National Security and Defense Strategy: Forever Wandering in the Wilderness?’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 23/3 (September 2010), 438–60. doi;10.1080/13518046.2010.503146
   Google Scholar
• Sheltes, E., ‘Comment of the Chairman of the Centre for Defence and Security Policy’, in Defence Bulletin, No. 5 (Kyiv: Centre for Defence and Security Policy 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sherr, James., ‘Civil-Democratic Control of Ukraine’s Armed Forces: To What End? by What Means?’, in David Betz and John Löwenhardt (eds.), Army and State in Postcommunist Europe (London: Frank Cass 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Jeffrey., NATO and the Czech and Slovak Republics: Comparative Study in Civil-Military Relations (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Slovakia, The White Paper on Defence of the Slovak Republic (Bratislava: Ministry of Defence 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Slovenia, Defence Sector Strategic Review 2009 (DSSR): Summary of Key DSSR 2009 Conclusions, No. 800-1/2009-189 (Ljubljana: Ministry of Defence 14 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Slovenia, ‘Resolution on General Long-Term Development and Equipping Programme of the Slovenian Armed Forces up to 2025.’ Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 99/2010, (Ljubljana: Ministry of Defence 7 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Slovenia, Annual Report of the Ministry of Defence for 2013, No. 0100-127/2013-34 (Ljubljana: Ministry of Defence 27 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Soukupova, Kristina., ‘The Influence of Civil-Military Relations on the Implementation of Network Enabled Capabilities as a Transformation Driver and Security Sector Consolidation Catalyst in the Czech Republic,’ Ph.D. dissertation, King’s College London, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Štrbac, Katarina., Briefing. ‘Ministerial Guidance 2007ʹ (Belgrade: Ministry of Defence, Department of Strategic Planning, circa March 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Szemerkenyi, Reka, ‘Central European Civil-Military Reforms at Risk’. Adelphi Paper 306, (London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Ukraine, The White Book 2006, Defence Policy of Ukraine (Kyiv: Ministry of Defence, Zapovit Publishing House 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ukraine, ‘Ukraine’s Military Doctrine’. Approved by the President of Ukraine, No. 555/2015 (Kyiv: Ministry of Defence 24 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vance, Gordon, C. and Wade Hinkle, ‘Best Practices in Defence Resource Management’. IDA Document D-4137 (Washington DC: Institute for Defense Analysis January 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Vendil Pallin, Carolina and Fredrik Westerlund, ‘Russia’s War in Georgia: Lessons and Consequences’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 20/2 (June 2009), 400–24. doi;10.1080/09592310902975539
   Google Scholar
• Vlachova, Marie., ‘Defence Reform in the Czech Republic’, in Istvan Gyarmati and Theodor Winkler (eds.), Post-Cold War Defence Reform: Lessons Learned in Europe and the United States (Washington DC: Brassey’s 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Amadeo., ‘Security Sector Reform and Donor Assistance in Serbia: Complexity of Managing Change’ (Shrivenham: Defence Academy of the United Kingdom September 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yusufi, Islam., ‘Macedonia’, in Miroslav Hadžić, Milorad Timotić, and Predrag Petrović (eds.), Security Policies in the Western Balkans (Belgrade: Centre for Civil-Military Relations 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yusufi, Islam., ‘Republic of Macedonia: Defence Sector Assessment’, in Anja H. Ebnöther, Philipp H. Fluri, and Predrag Jurekovic (eds.), (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Zambori, Mihály., ‘Economically Viable Management and Defence Spending’, in Wim F. Van Eekelen and Philipp H. Fluri (eds.), Defence Institution Building (Vienna: LaVAK 2006).
   Google Scholar