Rethinking strategic culture: A computational (social science) discursive-institutionalist approach

Bibliography

• Adler, Emanuel and Peter M. Haas, ‘Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization 46/1 ( Winter 1992), 367–90. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, Edwin and Kelly M. Ramsey, ‘Institutional Theory’, in Kevin T. Leicht and Craig J. Jenkins (eds.), Handbook of Politics (New York: Springer 2010), 15–39.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek and Rasmus B. Pedersen, ‘What Is Process Tracing Actually Tracing? the Three Variants of Process Tracing Methods and Their Uses and Limitations’, Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual meeting, Seattle, USA, 1–4 Nov., 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel, Robert Cox, and Henry Cox, ‘Introduction: Ideas and Politics’, in Daniel Béland and Robert Henry Cox (eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ephraim, Shaiel, ‘“In Blood and Fire”: Strategic Subcultures and the Roots of Israeli Strategic Culture’, Paper presented at the ‘A Western or Eastern Nations? The Case of Israel’ – the 32nd Annual Conference of the Association of Israel Studies, Jerualsem, Israel, 20–22 Jun., 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey T. Checkel, ‘Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices’, in Jeffrey T. Checkel and Andrew Bennet (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014), 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Benthall, Sebastian, ‘Philosophy of Computational Social Science’, Cosmos and History: the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 12/2 (2016), 13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Alan, ‘Time to Move On: Reconceptualizing the Strategic Culture Debate’, Contemporary Security Policy 33/3 (October 2012), 437–61. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.727679
   Google Scholar
• Borge-Holthoefer, Javier, Yamir Moreno, and Taha Yasseri, ‘Editorial: At the Crossroads: Lessons and Challenges in Computational Social Science’, Frontiers in Physics 4/37 (August 2016), 1–3. doi:10.3389/fphy.2016.00037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Alex, ‘Reconsidering the Early Fourth Generation’. [Blog] Alex Burns Australian Political Scientists. Accessed July 25 2017. Available at: http://www.alexburns.net/tag/strategic-culture/.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Alex and Ben Eltham, ‘Australia’s Strategic Culture: Constraints and Opportunities in Security Policymaking’, Contemporary Security Policy 35/2 (June 2014), 187–210. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.927672
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, Giovanni and Kelemen, R. Daniel, ‘The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism’, World Politics 59/3 (April 2007), 341–69. doi:10.1017/S0043887100020852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Ray M., Robert J. Kauffman, and Young O. Kwon, ‘Understanding the Paradigm Shift to Computational Social Science in the Presence of Big Data’, Decision Support Systems 63 (2014), 67–80. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio, ‘Preface’, in Claudio Cioffi-Revilla (ed.), Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications (London: Springer 2014), locations 31–80. [Kindle edition]
   Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio, ‘Introduction’, in Claudio Cioffi-Revilla (ed.), Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications (London: Springer 2014), location 921 page 17. [Kindle edition]
   Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio, Bigger Computational Social Science: Data, Theories, Models, and Simulations – Not Just Big Data (May 24, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2784278 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2784278.
   Google Scholar
• Darryl, Howlett and John Glenn, ‘Epilogue: Nordic Strategic Culture’, Cooperation and Conflict 40/1 (March 2005), 121–40. doi:10.1177/0010836705049737
   Google Scholar
• Desch, Michael C., ‘Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies’, International Security 23/1 (Summer 1998), 141–70. doi:10.1162/isec.23.1.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, Thad, ‘Improving Process Tracing: The Case of Multi-Method Research’, in Jeffrey T. Checkel and Andrew Bennet (eds.), Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014), 211–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform? Discussion Paper 05/2 (Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Egami, Naoki, et al, ‘How to Make Causal Inferences Using Texts’. Accessed October 20 2018. Available at: https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/bstewart/files/ais.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, Gil and Larissa Buchholz, ‘From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions’, Annual Review of Sociology 36 (2010), 117–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, John, ‘Realism versus Strategic Culture: Competition and Collaboration?’ International Studies Review 11 (September 2009), 523–51. doi:10.1111/misr.2009.11.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennan, Stuart S., ‘Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation’, Erkenntnis 44/1 (January 1996), 49–71. doi:10.1007/BF00172853
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., ‘Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back’, Review of International Studies 25/1 (January 1999), 49–69. doi:10.1017/S0260210599000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture (Fort Belvoir VA: Defense Threat Reduction Agency 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin and Brandom M. Stewart, ‘Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts’, Political Analysis 21/3 (2013), 267–97. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M., ‘Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination – Introduction’, International Organization 46/1 ( Winter 1992), 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, David G., ‘What Can Strategic Culture Contribute to Our Understanding of Security Policies in the Asia-Pacific Region?’ Contemporary Security Policy 35/2 (June 2014), 310–28. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.927674
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A. and C. R. Taylor Rosemary, ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44/5 (December 1996), 936–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberger, Raphael H. and Jan R. Riebling, ‘Installing Computational Social Science: Facing the Challenges of New Information and Communication Technologies in Social Science’, Methodological Innovation 9 (2016), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2059799115622763
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, Ellen M., ‘Historical-Institutionalism in Political Science and the Problem of Change’, in Andreas Wimmer and Reinhart Kössler (eds.), Understanding Change: Methods, Methodologies and Metaphors (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2006), 237–59.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, Checkel, Jeffrey Friedman, Matthias Matthijs, and Rogers Smith, ‘Roundtable on Ideational Turns in the Four Subdisciplines of Political Science’, Critical Review 28/2 (July 2016), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair I., ‘Thinking about Strategic Culture’, International Security 19/4 ( Spring 1995), 32–64. doi:10.2307/2539119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair I., ‘Strategic Cultures Revisited: Reply to Colin Gray’, Review of International Studies 25/3 (July 1999), 519–23. doi:10.1017/S0260210599005197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, ‘Restructuring the Social Sciences: Reflections from Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science’, PS: Political Science & Politics 47/1 (January 2014), 165–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, ‘Preface’, in R. Michael Alvarez (ed.), Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction (New York: Cambridge University Press 2016), locations 74–140. [Kindle edition]
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, Ronald R. and Jennifer K. Lobasz, ‘Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq’, Security Studies 16/3 (August 2007), 409–51. doi:10.1080/09636410701547881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantis, Jeffrey S., ‘Strategic Culture and National Security Policy’, International Studies Review 4/3 ( Autumn 2002), 87–113. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00266
   Google Scholar
• Lebel, Udi, ‘Postmodern or Conservative? Competing Security Communities over Military Doctrine-Israeli National-Religious Soldiers as Counter (Strategic) Culture Agents’, Political and Military Sociology: an Annual Review 40 (2013), 23–57.
   Google Scholar
• Libel, Tamir, European Military Culture and Security Governance: Soldiers, Scholars and National Defence Universities (London: Routledge 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Libel, Tamir, ‘Explaining the Security Paradigm Shift: Strategic Culture, Epistemic Communities, and Israel’s Changing National Security Policy’, Defence Studies 16/2 (March 2016), 137–56. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1165595
   Google Scholar
• Libel, Tamir, ‘Restarting History: Post-Cold War Ontological Insecurity, Epistemic Communities and the Remaking of Strategic Cultures’, Paper presented at the German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg, Germany, 17 Nov. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Libel, Tamir and Vanessa Hubl, ‘Tracing Strategic Culture: A Computational Approach’, Paper presented at the 11th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Barcelona, Spain, 13–16 Sep. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, Robert C., ‘Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change’, American Political Science Review 96/4 (December 2002), 697–712. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Christopher, et al, ‘Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics’, Political Analysis 23/2 (2015), 254–77. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Christoph O and Eva Strickmann, ‘Solidifying Constructivism: How Material and Ideational Factors Interact in European Defence’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49/1 (January 2011), 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, Alvarez, R., ‘Introduction’, in R. Michael Alvarez (ed.), Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction (New York: Cambridge University Press 2016), locations 143–773. [Kindle edition]
   Google Scholar
• Mirow, Wilhelm, Strategic Culture, Securitisation and the Use of Force: Post-9/11 Security Practices of Liberal Democracies (London: Routledge 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Oros, Andrew L., ‘Japan’s Strategic Culture: Security Identity in a Fourth Modern Incarnation?’ Contemporary Security Policy 35/2 (June 2014), 227–48. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.928070
   Google Scholar
• Poore, Stuart, ‘What Is the Context? A Reply to the Gray-Johnston Debate on Strategic Culture’, Review of International Studies 29/2 (April 2003), 279–84. doi:10.1017/S0260210503002791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Margaret E., et al. ‘The Structural Topic Model and Applied Social Science’, Advances in neural information processing systems workshop on topic models: computation, application, and evaluation, Harrah’s & Harveys, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 9 - 10 December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, and Edoardo M. Airoldi, ‘A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 111/515 (2016), 988–1003. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A, ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008), 303–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A., ‘Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism”’, European Political Science Review 2/1 (March 2010), 1–25. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Dhavan V., Joseph N. Cappella, and W. Russell Neuman, ‘Big Data, Digital Media, and Computational Social Science: Possibilities and Perils’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659/1 (April 2015), 6–13. doi:10.1177/0002716215572084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sil, Rudra and Peter J. Katzenstein, ‘Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions’, Perspectives on Politics 8/2 (June 2010), 411–31. doi:10.1017/S1537592710001179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack, The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Nuclear Options (Santa Monica: Rand Corporation 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, Sven, ‘What Is Historical Institutionalism?’ in Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (Newbury Park, CA: Sage 2008), 150–78.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Elizabeth, Comparative Strategic Cultures Literature Review (Fort Belvoir: Defense Threat Reduction Agency-Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, Hanna, ‘Computational Social Science: Toward a Collaborative Future’, in Alvarez, R. Michael (ed.), Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction (New York: Cambridge University Press 2016), locations 7867–8083. [Kindle edition]
   Google Scholar