How do wars end? A multidisciplinary enquiry

Bibliography

• Alvargonzález, David. Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences’. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25/4 (2011):387–403. doi:10.1080/02698595.2011.623366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, Resat. Peace Transitions and Democracy. Journal of Peace Research 47/5 (2010):535–46. doi:10.1177/0022343310370102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdal, Mats and David M. Malone, ‘Introduction’, in Mats Berdal and David M. Malone (eds.), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000), 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, Eric M. Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs 28/4 (2003):1289–312. doi:10.1086/368328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1998)
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Berry and Lene Hansen, The Evolution of International Security Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Berenice A. Peace Research – Cult of Power. Journal of Conflict Resolution 16/4 (1972):585–616. doi:10.1177/002200277201600409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Bernard C. K. and Anita W. P. Pak. Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Health Research, Services, Education and Policy: 1. Definitions, Objectives, and Evidence of Effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 29 (2006):351–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clignet, Remi and Allen Fertziger. Independent Inventions in the Social Sciences: A Plea for Multidisciplinarity. Science Communication 11/2 (1989):170–80
   Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher, The Future of War: The Re-Enchantment of War in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher, Future of War (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Confortini, Catia. Galtung, Violence, and Gender: The Case for a Peace Studies/Feminism Alliance. Peace & Change 31/3 (2006):333–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0130.2006.00378.x
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Warfare, (London: Chatham House, 2017), available at https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2017-01-26-artificial-intelligence-future-warfare-cummings-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danner, Mark, Spiral: Trapped in the Forever War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed, 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Dupre, John, The Disorder of Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)
   Google Scholar
• Fabbro, David. Peaceful Societies: An Introduction. Journal of Conflict Resolution 15/1 (1978):67–83
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, The Future of War: A History (New York: Penguin, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, Robert. ‘Interdisciplinarity’, in Byron Kaldis. ed.. Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences (Thousand Oaks: Sage (2013) 1:495–97
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, Robert. The Future of Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction to the 2nd Edition. Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto C. S. Pachecoeds.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2ndOxfordOxford University Press2017
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Steve. The Military-Industrial Route to Interdisciplinarity. Steve Fullered.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OxfordOxford University Press20171–26
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, Johan. Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6/3 (1969):167–91. doi:10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Jonas Nordkvelle, and Håvard Strand. Peace Research – Just the Study of War?. Journal of Peace Research 51/2 (2014):145–58. doi:10.1177/0022343313514074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian, ‘Representing and Intervening’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, Jeff. Security? What Do You Mean?. European Journal of International Relations 4 (1998):226–55. doi:10.1177/1354066198004002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaag, John and Sarah Kreps, Drone Warfare (Cambridge: Polity, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary, New and Old Wars, Organized Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity, 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, Douglas, Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity and Politics between the Modern and the Post-Modern (London: Routledge, 1995)
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thomson. Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition. Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto C. S. Pachecoeds.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2nd edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), available at http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198733522-e-3
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Keith and Michael C. Williams, Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (London: UCL Press, 1997)
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, Wolfgang. Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge. Robert Frodemaned.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OxfordOxford University Press201031–38
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, Carl and Nan Wang. Interdisciplinarity in Ethics. Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto C. S. Pachecoeds.The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2nd edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), available at http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198733522-e-20
   Google Scholar
• Morin, Edgar. Interdisciplinarité et Transdisciplinarité. Transversales Science Culture 29 (1994):4–8
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Edward. The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed’. Security Dialogue 35/2 (2004):173–89. doi:10.1177/0967010604044975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynning, Sten. War Studies – En Introduktion. Oekonomi og Politik 90/1 (2017):3–10
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, Daniel, ’Against Holism’, in Peter Galison and David J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, Frank and Niklas Schörnig. Killer Drones: The ‘Silver Bullet’ of Democratic Warfare?. Security Dialogue 43/4 (2012):363–80. doi:10.1177/0967010612450207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shashank, Joshi. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. International Affairs 94/5 (2018):1176–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee. Are Two (Or Three or Four … or Nine) Heads Better than One? Collaboration, Multidisciplinarity, and Publishability. PS: Political Science & Politics 42/3 (2009):507–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W., Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (New York: Penguin, 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Stahn, Carsten, Jennifer S. Easterday, and Jens Iverson (eds.), Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Stahn, Carsten and Jann K. Kleffner (eds.), Jus Post Bellum: Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace (Den Haag: TMC Asser 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, Henry and Sibylle Scheipers (eds.), The Changing Character of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
   Google Scholar