Nodal defence: the changing structure of U.S. alliance systems in Europe and East Asia

Bibliography

• Akimoto, Daisuke, The Abe Doctrine: Japan’s Proactive Pacifism and Security Strategy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Nathaniel D.F., ‘Assessing a Decade of US Military Strategy in Africa’, Orbis 62/4 (2018), 655–559. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2018.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Arteaga, Félix, ‘The Coming Defense: Criteria for the Restructuring of Defense in Spain’, Elcano Policy Paper 3 (14 January 2014), 140–156.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, David P. and Stephen M. Saideman, NATO in Afghanistan. Fighting Together, Fighting Alone (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Defence, ‘United States Force Posture Initiatives in Australia,’ http://www.defense.gov.au/Initiatives/USFPI
   Google Scholar
• Baev, Jordan, ‘Bulgaria and Romania’, in Hugo Meijer and Marco Wyss (eds.), The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018), 263–78.
   Google Scholar
• Béraud-Sudreau, Lucie and Bastian Giegerich, ‘NATO Defense Spending and European Threat Perceptions’, Survival 60/4 (2018), 53–74. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1495429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Margherita, Guillaume Lasconjarias, and Alessandro Marrone, ‘Projecting Stability in NATO’s Southern Neighbourhood’, NATO Defence College Conference Report 3 (July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Breedlove, Philip, Statement to the Senate Committee on Armed Forces, 1 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Breedlove, Philip, Statement to the Senate Committee on Armed Forces, 25 February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Breedlove, Philip, Statement to the Senate Committee on Armed Forces, 1 March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Victor D., ‘Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia’, International Security 34/3 (2009/10), 158–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, Victor D., ‘Complex Patchworks: U.S. Alliances as Part of Asia’s Regional Architecture’ Asia Policy 11/2 (2011), 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Chien-peng, ‘Southeast Asia-China Relations: Dialectics of ‘hedging’ and ‘counter-hedging’’, Southeast Asian Affairs (2004), 35–53. doi:10.1355/SEAA04C
   Google Scholar
• Cottey, Andrew, ‘Europe’s New Subregionalism’, Journal of Strategic Studies 23/2 (2000), 23–47. doi:10.1080/01402390008437789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Patrick et al., The Emerging Asia Power Web: The Rise of Bilateral Intra-Asian Security Ties (Washington, D.C.: Centre for a New American Security 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dorman, Andrew, ‘The Future of British Defense Policy,’ Focus Stratégique 74, (Paris: IFRI 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Richard et al., Networking Asian Security (Washington, D.C.: Center for New American Security 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Tuomas, ‘The Rise of Nordic Defence Cooperation: A Return to Regionalism?’, International Affairs 80/5 (2013), 1161–81. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (de) France, Olivier and Nick Witney, ‘Europe’s Strategic Cacophony’, ECFR Policy Brief 77 (April 2014), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Michael J., Kathleen H. Hicks, and Zack Cooper, Federated Defense in Asia (Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Michael et al., Asia-Pacific Rebalance 2025: Capabilities, Presence, and Partnerships (Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Hai, Do Thanh, ‘Vietnam: Riding the Chinese Tide’, The Pacific Review 31/2 (2018), 205–20. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1377282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heazle, Michael and Yuki Tatsumi, ‘Explaining Australia–Japan Security Cooperation and Its Prospects: ‘the Interests that Bind?’, The Pacific Review 31/1 (2018), 38–56. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1310750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, Masha and Andres Kasekamp, ‘The Baltic States’, in Hugo Meijer and Marco Wyss (eds.), The Handbook of European Defense Policies and Armed Forces (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018), 214–230.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmer, Christopher and Peter J. Katzenstein, ‘Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism’, International Organization 56/3 (2000), 575–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, Uk and Terence Roehrig, The Evolution of the South Korea-United States Alliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, Piero, Giampiero Giacomello, and Fabrizio Coticchia, Italian Military Operations Abroad: Just Don’t Call It War (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, ‘Power, Trust, and Network Complexity: Three Logics of Hedging in Asian Security’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 14/3 (2014), 331–56. doi:10.1093/irap/lcu005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazianis, Harry J. (ed.), Tackling Asia’s Greatest Challenges: A U.S.-Japan-Vietnam Trilateral Report (Washington, D.C.: Center for the National Interest 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kazianis, Harry J. (ed.), Tackling Asia’s Greatest Challenges: U.S.-Japan-Vietnam Trilateral Report (Washington, D.C.: Center for the National Interest 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Franklin D. and Magnus Nordenman, ‘A Maritime Framework for the Baltic Sea Region’, Atlantic Council Issue Brief (March 2016), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, Ulrich, History and Foreign Policy in France and Germany (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Edward, ‘South Korea’s Deterrence Strategy Against North Korea’s WMD’, East Asia 35/1 (2018), 1–21. doi:10.1007/s12140-018-9282-9
   Google Scholar
• LaGrone, Sam, ‘Spain and U.S. Sign Permanent Basing Agreement for up to 3,500 U.S. Marines’, USNI News, 18 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, Alexander and Michael A. Hunzeker, ‘Confronting the Anti-Access/Area Denial and Precision Strike Challenge in the Baltic Region’, The RUSI Journal 161/5 (2016), 12–18. doi:10.1080/03071847.2016.1253367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, Alexander and Michael A. Hunzeker, Conventional Deterrence and Landpower in Northeastern Europe (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jeffrey and Bruno Tertrais, ‘Deterrence at Three: US, UK and French Nuclear Cooperation’, Survival 57/4 (2015), 29–52. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1068554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liff, Adam P., ‘Whither the Balancers? the Case for a Methodological Reset’, Security Studies 25/3 (2016), 420–59. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1195624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, Walter, Lewis Stern, and William Jordan, U.S.–Vietnam Defense Relations: Investing in Strategic Alignment (Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, Alexander, ‘The NATO Warsaw Summit: How to Strengthen Alliance Cohesion’, Strategic Forum 296, (Washington, D.C.: Institute for National Strategic Studies 2016).
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, William H., ‘Admiral: Rota DDG mission goes beyond BMD’, Navy Times, 5 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, Hugo and Marco Wyss, ‘Upside Down: Reframing European Defence Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict 54/3 (2019), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, Hugo and Marco Wyss, ‘Beyond CSDP: The Resurgence of National Armed Forces in Europe’, in Hugo Meijer and Marco Wyss, (eds.), The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, Leo, ‘Cross-Currents in French Defense and U.S. Interests’, Strategic Perspectives 10 ( Washington, D.C.: Institute for National Strategic Studies 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Misalucha, Charmaine G. and Julio S. Amador III, ‘U.S.‐Philippines Security Ties: Building New Foundations?’, Asian Politics & Policy 8/1 (2016), 51–61. doi:10.1111/aspp.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishino, Junya, ‘Japan’s Security Relationship with the Republic of Korea’, CSIS Strategic Japan Working Paper, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Noetzel, Timo and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Does a Multi-tier NATO Matter? the Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change’, International Affairs 85/2 (2009), 211–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obama, Barack and François Hollande, ‘France and the U.S. Enjoy a Renewed Alliance’, The Washington Post, 10 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pannier, Alice, ‘From One Exceptionalism to Another: France’s Strategic Relations with the United States and the United Kingdom in the post-Cold War Era’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/4 (2017), 475–504. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1230546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannier, Alice and Olivier Schmitt, ‘To Fight Another Day: France Between the Fight against Terrorism and Future Warfare’, International Affairs (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, Chris, ‘Singapore: Forward Operating Site’, in Carnes Lord and Andrew S. Erickson (eds.), Rebalancing the Force: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, Jens and Sten Rynning, ‘Now for the Hard Part: NATO’s Strategic Adaptation to Russia’, Survival 59/3 (2017), 129–46. doi:10.1080/00396338.2017.1325603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saideman, Stephen M. and David P. Auerswald, ‘Comparing Caveats: Understanding the Sources of National Restrictions upon NATO’s Mission in Afghanistan’, International Studies Quarterly 56/1 (2012), 67–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake, Tomohiko and John Hemmings, ‘Japan–Australia Security Cooperation in the Bilateral and Multilateral Contexts’, International Affairs 94/4 (2018), 815–34. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxi, Håkon Lunde, ‘The Rise, Fall and Resurgence of Nordic Defence Cooperation’, International Affairs 95/3 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, Michael, Altered States: The United States and Japan since the Occupation (New York: Oxford University Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Olivier, ‘The Reluctant Atlanticist: France’s Security and Defence Policy in a Transatlantic Context’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/4 (2017), 463–74. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1220367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simón, Luis, ‘Understanding US Retrenchment in Europe’, Survival 57/2 (2015), 157–72. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1026093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simón, Luis, ‘The “Third” US Offset Strategy and Europe’s “anti-access” Challenge’, Journal of Strategic Studies 39/3 (2016), 417–45. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1163260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn, Alliance Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Stavridis, James, Statement to the Senate Committee on Armed Forces, 19 April (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Tan, See Seng, ‘The ADMM-Plus: Regionalism That Works?’, Asia Policy 22 (2016), 70–75. doi:10.1353/asp.2016.0024
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais, Bruno, ‘French Nuclear Deterrence Policy, Forces, and Future’, Foundation for Strategic Research, January 2019.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘U.S. Building Maritime Capacity in Southeast Asia” Fact Sheet 17 (November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tow, William T. and Brendan Taylor (eds.), Bilateralism, Multilateralism and Asia-Pacific Security: Contending Cooperation (New York: Routledge 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Valášek, Tomáš and Milan Šuplata, ‘Towards a Deeper Visegrad Defence Partnership’, Central European Policy Institute, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• (Van) Vranken Hickey, Dennis, United States-Taiwan Security Ties: From Cold War to beyond Containment (Westport, CT: Praeger 1994).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, Asia-Pacific Maritime Security Strategy: Achieving U.S National Security in a Changing Environment (Washington, D.C., 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. State Department, ‘The U.S.-Australia Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty’, Fact Sheet, 18 January 2017, (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs)
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., ‘Why Alliances Endure or Collapse’, Survival 39/1 (1997), 156–79. doi:10.1080/00396339708442901
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, Joel, ‘U.S. “minilateralism” in Asia and China’s Responses: A New Security Dilemma?’, Journal of Contemporary China 28/115 (2018), 133–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaborowski, Marcin, ‘Poland: NATO’s Front Line State’, in John Andreas Olsen (ed.), Whitehall Papers Vol. 93 (Security in Northern Europe: Deterrence, Defense and Dialogue 1 2018), 88–97.
   Google Scholar