Signalling capacity and crisis diplomacy: Explaining the failure of ‘maximum pressure’ in the 2017 U.S.-North Korea nuclear crisis

Bibliography

• Fearon, James D., ‘Signaling foreign policy interests: Tying hands versus sinking costs’, Journal of Conflict ( February 1997), 68–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John, ‘Louder than Words: Tacit Communication in International Crises’, Political Communication 9/3 (1992), 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Art, Robert J. and Kelly M. Greenhill, ‘Coercion: An Analytical Overview’, in Kelly M Greenhill and Peter Krause (eds.), Coercion: The Power to Hurt in International Politics (NY: Oxford UP 2018), 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Arms Control Association, ‘Current U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance’, August 2019. <https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/usmissiledefense>
   Google Scholar
• Bakich, Spencer D., Success and Failure in Limited War: Information and Strategy in the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, and Iraq Wars (Chicago: Chicago UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, Michael, ‘The Emerging Military Balance in East Asia: How China’s Neighbors Can Check Chinese Naval Expansion’, International Security 42/2 ( Fall 2017), 78–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, Peter, Trump and His Generals: The Cost of Chaos (NY: Penguin 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Berger, David H., Commandant’s Planning Guidance (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Stephen and Ivan Oelrich, ‘Future Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, U.S. AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia’, International Security 41/1 ( Summer 2016), 7–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, Aaron, ‘The White House’s Misleading Statements about Trump’s “Armada” Heading to North Korea’, Washington Post, 18 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Eric, ‘Can the U.S. reinstate “maximum pressure” on North Korea?’, Foreign Affairs, 4 December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bucholz, Arden, Moltke and the German Wars, 1864-1871 (NY: Palgrave 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Byman, Daniel and Matthew Waxman, The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might (NY: Cambridge UP 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Victor, The Impossible State: North Korea past and Future (NY: HarperCollins 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Victor and Katrin Fraser Katz, ‘The Right Way to Coerce North Korea: Ending the Threat without Going to War’, Foreign Affairs 97/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Thomas, Worse than a Monolith: Alliance Politics and Problems of Coercive Diplomacy in Asia (Princeton: Princeton UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, Dale C., Origins of Major War (Ithaca: Cornell UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, Michael P., ‘What if Kim Jong un decides to bloody America’s nose first?’, War on the Rocks, 21 February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, George W. and David M. Rocke, Tacit Bargaining, Arms Races, and Arms Control (Ann Arbor: Michigan UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Downs, George W. and David M. Rocke, ‘Tacit Bargaining and Arms Control’, World ( April 1987), 297–325.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, David M., ‘Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs about Intentions and the Rise of Great Power’, Security Studies 12/1 ( Autumn 2002), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D., ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, American Political Science Review 88/3 (September 1994), 577–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filkins, Dexter, ‘Rex tillerson at the breaking point’, New Yorker, 16 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Uri, ‘The World according to H.R. McMaster’, The Atlantic, 9 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gady, Franz-Stefan, ‘Deterring pyongyang: US, South Korea conclude military exercise’, The Diplomat, 28 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles L. and Chaim Kaufmann, ‘What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and Can We Measure It?’, International Security 22/4 ( Spring 1998), 44–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Avery, ‘First Things Frist: The Pressing Danger of Crisis Instability in U.S.-China Relations’, International Security 37/4 ( Spring 2013), 49–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Mark L., ‘Prospect Theory and the Cuban Missile Crisis’, International Studies Quarterly 45/2 (June 2001), 241–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van, On the Brink: Trump, Kim, and the Threat of Nuclear War (NY: Columbia UP 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo, ‘Reinterpreting Libya’s WMD Turnaround—Bridging the Carrot-Coercion Divide’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (2012), 489–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentleson, Bruce W. and Christopher A. Whytock, ‘Who “Won” Libya? the Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its Implications for Theory and Policy’, International Security 30/3 ( Winter 2005/06), 47–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, and Mira Rapp-Hooper, ‘Perception and Misperception on the Korean Peninsula’, Foreign Affairs 97/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Christine, ‘U.S. envoy says no communication, no signal from North Korea amid nuclear crisis’, Reuters, 17 November 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Landler, Mark, ‘White house wants Pentagon to offer more options on North Korea’, New York Times, 2 February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, Catherine C. and Jean-Pierre P. Langlois, ‘Tacit Bargaining in International Relations: A Game Model and A Case Study’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 40/4 (December 1996), 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Dong Sun and Iordanka Alexandrova, ‘North Korean Nuclear Strategy: Envisioning Assured Retaliation’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific (10 December 2019). doi:10.1093/irap/lcz028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limitone, Julia, ‘Trump on North Korea threats: We are sending an armada’, Fox Business, 12 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Litwak, Robert S., Regime Change: U.S. Strategy through the Prism of 9/11 (Washington, D.C.: Wilson Center Press 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Martina, Michael, ‘China Welcomes U.S. seeking dialog with North Korea’, Reuters, 3 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mastro, Oriana Skylar, ‘Conflict and Chaos on the Korean Peninsula: Can China’s Military Help Secure North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons?’, International Security 43/2 ( Fall 2018), 84–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J., Conventional Deterrence (Ithaca: Cornell UP 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Evan Braden, Extended Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age: Geopolitics, Proliferation, and the Future of U.S. Security Commitments (Washington, D.C.: CSBA 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Mount, Adam, Conventional Deterrence of North Korea (Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, David and Anne Gearan, ‘In U.N. speech, trump threatens to “totally destroy North Korea” and calls Kim Jong Un “rocket man”’, Washington Post, 19 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nikitin, Mary and D. Beth, ‘North Korea’s Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs’, IF10472, Congressional Research Service, 6 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• ‘OPLAN 5027 Major Theater War— West’. <https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/oplan-5027.htm>
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, Erik and Arata Yamamoto, ‘Sen. Lindsey Graham: Trump Says War with North Korea an Option’, NBC News, 1 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Ankit, ‘North Korea Carries Out Sixth Nuclear Test of Claimed Two-Stage Thermonuclear Bomb’, The Diplomat.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Ankit, ‘The Hwasong-15: The Anatomy of North Korea’s New ICBM’, The Diplomat, 6 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Ankit, ‘What 3 US Supercarriers in the Asia-Pacific Means for North Korea’, The Diplomat, 30 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Ankit and Vipin Narang, ‘North Korea’s ICBM: A New Missile and A New Era’, War on the Rocks, 6 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Michael, ‘OPLAN 5015: The Secret Plan for Destroying North Korea (And Start World War III?)’, The National Interest, 11 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, Joshua, ‘From LeMay to McMaster: The Pentagon’s Difficult Relationship with Deterrence’, War on the Rocks, 29 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Press, Daryl G., Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats (Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Riley-Smith, Ben, ‘Exclusive: US Making Plans for ‘Bloody Nose’ Military Attack on North Korea’, The Telegraph, 20 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rogin, Josh, ‘Trump’s North Korea Policy Is “Maximum Pressure” but Not “Regime Change”’, Washington Post, 14 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D. and Jeremi Suri, ‘The Madman Nuclear Alert: Secrecy, Signaling, and Safety in October 1969’, International Security 27/4 ( Spring 2003), 150–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, David, ‘Talk of “Preventive War” Rises in White House over North Korea’, New York Times, 20 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sang-Hun, Choe, ‘North Korean Hackers Stole U.S.-South Korean Military Plans, Lawmaker Says’, New York Times, 10 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale UP, 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge: Harvard UP 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Kenneth A., Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy (NY: Cambridge UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, Todd S., ‘Goliath’s Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power’, International Organization 64/4 ( Fall 2010), 627–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, David W., Rationality in the North Korean Regime: Understanding the Kims’ Strategy of Provocation (NY: Lexington Books 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Shore, Zachary, A Sense of the Enemy: The High Stakes History of Reading Your Rival’s Mind (NY: Oxford UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Martin A., ‘Denuclearising North Korea: Evaluating the United States’ Culpability for Failed Agreements, 1993-2008’, Diplomacy & Statecraft 30/3 (2019), 556–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, Guy M., Holding the Line: Inside Trump’s Pentagon with Secretary Mattis (NY: Sentinel 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack, Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 (Ithaca: Cornell UP 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack and Erica D. Borghard, ‘The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny, Not A Pound’, American Political Science Review 105/3 (August 2011), 437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Christopher A., ‘The Libyan Debate: Coercive Diplomacy Reconsidered’, Diplomacy & Statecraft 28/2 (2017), 320–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Guy, ‘CIA Says North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-un is not crazy, but “very rational”’, Washington Times, 4 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, AirSea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access and Area Denial Challenges (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, Joint Operational Access Concept (JOAC) (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, ‘Statement by Pentagon spokesman Col. Robert Manning on North Korea ICBM launch’, 28 November 2017.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, ‘U.S. Flies B1-B bomber mission off of North Korean coast’, 23 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, John and Jenna Johnson, ‘Trump vows North Korea will be met with “fire and fury” if threats continue’, Washington Post, 8 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Warrick, Joby, Ellen Nakashima, and Anna Fifield, ‘North Korea now making missile-ready nuclear weapons, U.S. Analysts Say’, Washington Post, 8 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Eli, ‘CIA chief signals desire for regime change in North Korea’, CNN, 21 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Bob, Fear: Trump in the White House (NY: Simon & Schuster 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Thomas, ‘The biggest danger of North Korea talks’, The Atlantic.
   Google Scholar