Visions of the next war or reliving the last one? Early alliance views of war with the Soviet Bloc

Bibliography

• Aalders, G., ‘The Failure of the Scandinavian Defence Union, 1948–1949’, Scandinavian Journal of History 15/1–2 (1990), 125–53. doi:10.1080/03468759008579194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, Richard J., Rory Cormac, and Michael S. Goodman, Spying on the World: The Declassified Documents of the Joint Intelligence Committee (Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Aron, R., ‘The “Medentente Cordiale”: II–Some French Fears’, The Manchester Guardian, 1 Dec. 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, H.W., ‘NATO Fleet Sails to “Defend” Danes: U.S. Marines to Make Landing to Reinforce Kiel Canal Area in Mainbrace Exercise’, The New York Times, 21 Sep. 1952.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Belgian Tells U.N. Soviet Policy is More “Audacious’ than the Czars”: Spaak Assails Soviets’, Washington Post, 29 Sep. 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., ‘Maginot Defenses are Almost Intact’, New York Times, 21 June 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Cogan, Charles G., Forced to Choose: France, the Atlantic Alliance, and NATO – Then and Now (London: Praeger 1997).
   Google Scholar
• ‘Commons Welcome for Atlantic Pact’, The Times, 13 May 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, Kenneth W., The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, Volume II, 1947–1949 (Washington, DC: Office of Joint History Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, Paul, British Military Planning for the Defence of Germany 1945–50 (Hampshire,: Macmillan Press Ltd 1996).
   Google Scholar
• de Monsabert, General, ‘North Africa in Atlantic Strategy’, Foreign Affairs 31/3 (Apr. 1953), 418–26. doi:10.2307/20030975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Defence of the Territory’, Manchester Guardian, 5 Aug. 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Dilks, David, Churchill and Company: Allies and Rivals in War and Peace (London: I. B. Tauris 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Jill, Anglo-American Relations and the Franco Question, 1945–1955 (Oxford: Oxford UP 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, M. A., ‘Stalin’s Postwar Army Reappraised’, International Security 7/3 ( Winter 1982–1983), 110–38. doi:10.2307/2538554.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, William T.R., The Superpowers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union - Their Responsibility for Peace (New York: Harcourt Brace 1944).
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, Strategy: A History (Oxford: Oxford UP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J.F.C., ‘How to Defeat the Soviet Union’, Weekly Recorder, 24 Mar. 1951 republished in Military Review 31/7 (October 1951)
   Google Scholar
• Galambos, Louis, The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, Vol. 13: NATO and the Campaign of 1952 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, B., ‘Victory in A Nuclear War? A Comparison of NATO and WTO War Aims and Strategies’, Contemporary European History 7/3 (Nov. 1998), 311–27. doi:10.1017/S0960777300004264.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, ‘Stalin as Hitler’s Successor: Western Interpretations of the Soviet Threat’, in Beatrice Heuser and Robert O’Neill (eds.), Securing Peace in Europe, 1945–62: Thoughts for the Post-Cold War Era (London: Macmillan 1992), 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, NATO, Britain, France and the FRG: Nuclear Strategies and Forces for Europe, 1949–2000 (Basingstoke: Macmillan 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice and Robert O’Neill, Securing Peace in Europe, 1945–62: Thoughts for the Post-Cold War Era (London: Macmillan 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffenaar, J., ‘“Hannibal Ante Portas”: The Soviet Military Threat and the Build-up of the Dutch Armed Forces 1948–1958’, The Journal of Military History 66/1 (Jan. 2002), 163–91. doi:10.2307/2677348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., ‘Reassurance and Deterrence: Western Defense in the 1980s’, Foreign Affairs 61/2 ( Winter 1982), 309–24. doi:10.2307/20041437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Michael, Disengagement in Europe (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd 1958).
   Google Scholar
• James, E. L., ‘Fear of the Russians Haunts French Politics’, New York Times, 25 July 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R., ‘The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 24/4 (Dec. 1980), 563–92. doi:10.1177/002200278002400401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Lawrence, A Community of Interests: NATO and the Military Assistance Program, 1948–1951 (Washington DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense Historical Office 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, George, ‘Is War with Russia Inevitable?’, Department of State Bulletin, 20 Feb. 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, H. A., ‘The Unsolved Problems of European Defense’, Foreign Affairs 40/4 (July 1962), 515–41. doi:10.2307/20029577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr, Klaus, NATO and American Security (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Kruls, H.J., ‘The Defense of Europe’, Foreign Affairs 30/2 (Jan. 1952), 265–76. doi:10.2307/20030896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell Hart, B.H., Defence of the West: Some Riddles of War and Peace (London: Cassell and Co. Ltd 1950).
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W., ‘Today and Tomorrow: State Department and Pentagon’, Washington Post, 15 Apr. 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Mastny, Vojtech and Malcolm Byrne, A Cardboard Castle? An inside History of the Warsaw Pact, 1955–1991 (Budapest: Central European UP 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, D., ‘NATO Changes Direction’, Foreign Affairs 31/3 (Apr. 1953), 427–40. doi:10.2307/20030976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miksche, F.O., ‘The Strategic Importance of Western Europe’, Military Review 29/4 (July 1949), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Patrick M., Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1977).
   Google Scholar
• ‘Mr. Churchill on Europe’s Great Danger, Atomic Bomb Still a Shield’, The Manchester Guardian, 12 Aug. 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, W., ‘Armageddon: Political Elites and Their Visions of a General European War before 1914’, War in History 26/4 (2019), 448–69. doi:10.1177/0968344517736082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, N., ‘Danish and Norwegian Alliance Policies 1948–49: A Comparative Analysis’, Cooperation and Conflict 14/3 (Nov. 1979), 193–210. doi:10.1177/001083677901400303.
   Google Scholar
• Pharo, H., ‘Together Again: Anglo-Norwegian Relations and the Early Cold War’, Scandinavian Journal of History 37/2 (2012), 261–77. doi:10.1080/03468755.2012.667968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, Walter S., The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, Vol. IV, 1950–1952 (Washington DC: Office of Joint History Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, E., ‘The Birth of the North Atlantic Alliance’, International Journal 22/3 ( Summer 1967), 426–40. doi:10.1177/002070206702200307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Steven T., American War Plans 1945–1950 (New York: Garland Publishing Inc 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Sayle, Timothy, Enduring Alliance: A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order (Ithaca: Cornell UP 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Speier, Hans, German Rearmament and Atomic War: The Views of German Military and Political Leaders (Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson and Company 1957).
   Google Scholar
• Sulzberger, C.L., ‘Pitfalls Lie in the Path of Spain to a Defense Alliance with West’, New York Times, 7 Feb. 1951
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP 1999).
   Google Scholar
• United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Legislative Origins of the Truman Doctrine (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office 1947).
   Google Scholar
• United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and Committee on Armed Services, Assignment of Ground Forces of the United States to Duty in the European Area, Eighty-second Congress, Hearings, First Session, February 1951 (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office 1951).
   Google Scholar
• Viscount Bernard Law Montgomery, The Memoirs of Field Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein KG (Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing Company 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, Robert Allen, ‘Ambiguous legacy: The United States, Great Britain and the Foundations of NATO Strategy’, 1948–1957’, PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, 1991, 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Robert J., The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, 1953–1954, Vol. V (Washington, DC: Office of Joint History Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Welles, B., ‘Danes Ask Ridgway for Border Aid by Deploying Forces in Germany: Foreign Minister Said to Have Given Assurances on US Air Units in Country’, New York Times, 31 Jan. 1953.
   Google Scholar