Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Strategic Studies Volume 45, 2022 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,977
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Politics by many other means: The comparative strategic advantages of operational domains

Jon R. Lindsaya Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy and Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Erik Gartzkeb Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USAView further author information
Pages 743-776 | Published online: 01 Jun 2020

Bibliography

  • Acton, James M., ‘Escalation through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of an Inadvertent Nuclear War’, International Security 43/1 (1 August 2018), 56–99.
  • Art, Robert J., ‘Geopolitics Updated: The Strategy of Selective Engagement’, International Security 23/3 (1998), 79–113. doi:10.2307/2539339
  • Art, Robert J. and Kelly M Greenhill, ‘Coercion: An Analytical Overview’, in Kelly M. Greenhill and Peter J. P. Krause (eds.), Coercion: The Power to Hurt in International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press 2018), 3–32.
  • Bacon, Francis, Essays, Civil and Moral: And the New Atlantis (New York: P.F. Collier & Son 1909).
  • Bahney, Benjamin, Jonathan Pearl, and Michael Markey, ‘Anti-Satellite Weapons and the Instability of Deterrence’, in Jon R. Lindsay and Erik Gartzke (eds.), Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity (New York: Oxford University Press 2019), 121–43.
  • Bahney, Benjamin and Jonathan Pearl, ‘Why Creating a Space Force Changes Nothing’, Foreign Affairs (26 March 2019). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/space/2019-03-26/why-creating-space-force-changes-nothing
  • Bejtlich, Richard, The Practice of Network Security Monitoring: Understanding Incident Detection and Monitoring (San Francisco: No Starch Press 2013).
  • Benbow, Tim, The Magic Bullet? Understanding the Revolution in Military Affairs (London: Brassey’s 2004).
  • Betts, Richard K., ‘Is Strategy an Illusion?’, International Security 25/2 (2000), 5–50. doi:10.1162/016228800560444
  • Beyerchen, Alan, ‘Clausewitz, Nonlinearity, and the Unpredictability of War’, International Security 17/3 (1992), 59–90. doi:10.2307/2539130
  • Biddle, Stephen D, Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2004).
  • Biddle, Stephen, ‘Speed Kills? Reassessing the Role of Speed, Precision, and Situation Awareness in the Fall of Saddam’, Journal of Strategic Studies 30/1 (2007), 3–46. doi:10.1080/01402390701210749
  • Biddle, Tami Davis, Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2002).
  • Biddle, Tami Davis, ‘Coercion Theory: A Basic Introduction for Practitioners’, Texas National Security Review 3/2 (20 February 2020). https://tnsr.org/2020/02/coercion-theory-a-basic-introduction-for-practitioners/
  • Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, Trevor Pinch, and Deborah G Douglas, (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT press 1987).
  • Blainey, Geoffrey, Causes of War 3rd. (New York: Simon and Schuster 1988).
  • Bodmer, Sean, Max Kilger, Gregory Carpenter, and Jade Jones, Reverse Deception: Organized Cyber Threat Counter-Exploitation (New York: McGraw-Hill 2012).
  • Borghard, Erica D. and Shawn W. Lonergan, ‘The Logic of Coercion in Cyberspace’, Security Studies 26/3 (3 July 2017), 452–81. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1306396
  • Bowen, Bleddyn E, War in Space: Strategy, Spacepower, Geopolitics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2020).
  • Branch, Jordan, “What’s in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity,” Typescript, 2019.
  • Brodie, Bernard, Frederick Sherwood Dunn, Arnold Wolfers, Percy Ellwood Corbett, and William T. R. Fox, The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. 1946).
  • Builder, Carl H., The Masks of War: American Military Styles in Strategy and Analysis (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1989).
  • Carson, Austin and Keren Yarhi-Milo, ‘Covert Communication: The Intelligibility and Credibility of Signaling in Secret’, Security Studies 26/1 (2017), 124–56. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1243921
  • Carter, Ashton B., ‘Satellites and Anti-Satellites: The Limits of the Possible’, International Security 10/4 (1986), 46–98. doi:10.2307/2538950
  • Choucri, Nazli and David D. Clark, International Relations in the Cyber Age: The Co-Evolution Dilemma (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2018).
  • Clausewitz, Carl von, On War Translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1976).
  • Corbett, Julian Stafford, Some Principles of Maritime Strategy (London: Longmans, Green and Co. 1911).
  • Dafoe, Allan, ‘On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and A Mechanism’, Science, Technology & Human Values 40/6 (1 November 2015), 1047–76. doi:10.1177/0162243915579283
  • DeNardis, Laura, The Global War for Internet Governance (New Haven: Yale University Press 2014).
  • Deudney, Daniel, Whole Earth Security: A Geopolitics of Peace Worldwatch Paper 55. (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute 1983).
  • Drezner, Daniel W., ‘Economic Sanctions in Theory and Practice: How Smart are They?’, in Kelly M. Greenhill and Peter Krause (eds.), Coercion: The Power to Hurt in International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press 2018), 251–70.
  • Early, Bryan R. and Erik Gartzke. ‘Spying from Space: Reconnaissance Satellites and Interstate Disputes.’ Typescript, 20 Aug., 2017.
  • Fearon, James D., ‘Rationalist Explanations for War’, International Organization 49/3 (1995), 379–414. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033324
  • Fearon, James D., ‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41/1 (1 February 1997), 68–90. doi:10.1177/0022002797041001004
  • Frederick, Bryan, Stephen Watts, Matthew Lane, Abby Doll, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Meagan L. Smith, Understanding the Deterrent Impact of U.S. Overseas Forces (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation 2020).
  • Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity Press 2004).
  • Freedman, Lawrence, Strategy: A History (New York: Oxford University Press 2013).
  • Friedman, Norman, Seapower and Space: From the Dawn of the Missile Age to Net-Centric Warfare (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press 2000).
  • Gartzke, Erik, ‘War Is in the Error Term’, International Organization 53/3 (1999), 567–87. doi:10.1162/002081899550995
  • Gartzke, Erik, ‘Blood and Robots: How Remotely Piloted Vehicles and Related Technologies Affect the Politics of Violence’, Journal of Strategic Studies (3 October 2019), 1–31. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1643329
  • Gartzke, Erik and James Igoe Walsh, ‘The Drawbacks of Drones: The Effects of UAVs on Militant Violence in Pakistan’, Journal of Peace Research (Forthcoming).
  • Gartzke, Erik, Jeffrey M. Kaplow, and Rupal N. Mehta, ‘The Determinants of Nuclear Force Structure’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 58/3 (2014), 481–508. doi:10.1177/0022002713509054
  • Gartzke, Erik and Jon R. Lindsay, ‘Weaving Tangled Webs: Offense, Defense, and Deception in Cyberspace’, Security Studies 24/2 (2015), 316–48. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1038188
  • Gartzke, Erik and Jon R. Lindsay, ‘Thermonuclear Cyberwar’, Journal of Cybersecurity 3/1 (February 2017), 37–48.
  • Gartzke, Erik and Jon R. Lindsay, ‘The Influence of Seapower on Politics: Domain- and Platform-Specific Attributes of Material Capabilities,’ Security Studies (Forthcoming).
  • Gartzke, Erik and Koji Kagotani, ‘Being There: U.S. Troop Deployments, Force Posture and Alliance Reliability,’ Working Paper, 2017.
  • Gavin, Francis J, Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2012).
  • Glaser, Charles L., Analyzing Strategic Nuclear Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1990).
  • Glaser, Charles L. and Steve Fetter, ‘Should the United States Reject MAD? Damage Limitation and U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China’, International Security 41/1 (1 July 2016), 49–98. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00248
  • Goldstein, Avery, ‘First Things First: The Pressing Danger of Crisis Instability in U.S.-China Relations’, International Security 37/4 (2013), 49–89. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00114
  • Gompert, David C. and Phillip C. Saunders, The Paradox of Power: Sino-American Strategic Restraint in an Age of Vulnerability (Washington DC: National Defense University Press 2011).
  • Green, Brendan Rittenhouse and Austin Long, ‘Conceal or Reveal? Managing Clandestine Military Capabilities in Peacetime Competition’, International Security 44/3 (1 January 2020), 48–83. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00367
  • Greenhill, Kelly M., ‘Asymmetric Advantage: Weaponizing People as Nonmilitary Instruments of Cross-Domain Coercion’, in Jon R. Lindsay and Erik Gartzke (eds.), Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity (New York: Oxford University Press 2019), 259–89.
  • Haun, Phil M., Coercion, Survival, and War: Why Weak States Resist the United States (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2015).
  • Haun, Phil M., ‘Air Power versus Ground Forces—Deterrence at the Operational Level of War’, in Jon R. Lindsay and Erik Gartzke (eds.), Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity (New York: Oxford University Press 2019), 144–62.
  • Haun, Phil and Colin Jackson, ‘Breaker of Armies: Air Power in the Easter Offensive and the Myth of Linebacker I and II in the Vietnam War’, International Security 40/3 (1 January 2016), 139–78. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00226
  • Herrera, Geoffrey L., Technology and International Transformation: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press 2006).
  • Heuser, Beatrice, The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present (New York: Cambridge University Press 2010).
  • Hunzeker, Michael Allen and Alexander Lanoszka, ‘Landpower and American Credibility’, Parameters 45/4 (2015), 17–26.
  • Jervis, Robert, The Logic of Images in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1970).
  • Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1989).
  • Jervis, Robert, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein, Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 1985).
  • Johnson, Nicholas L. ‘Orbital Debris: The Growing Threat to Space Operations.’ Breckenridge, CO, 2010. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100004498
  • Johnston, Patrick B. and Anoop K. Sarbahi, ‘The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan’, International Studies Quarterly 60/2 (2016), 203–19. doi:10.1093/isq/sqv004
  • Kahn, David, ‘An Historical Theory of Intelligence’, Intelligence and National Security 16/3 (1 September 2001), 79–92. doi:10.1080/02684520412331306220
  • Kahn, Herman, On Thermonuclear War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1960).
  • Kennedy, Paul M., The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery Revised. (London: Penguin Random House 2017).
  • Kroenig, Matthew, The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters (New York: Oxford University Press 2018).
  • Lasswell, Harold D., Politics: Who Gets What, When, How (New York: Whittlesey House 1936).
  • Levy, Jack S. and William R. Thompson, ‘Balancing on Land and at Sea: Do States Ally against the Leading Global Power?’, International Security 35/1 (1 July 2010), 7–43. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00001
  • Libicki, Martin C., Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2009).
  • Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy’, International Security 30/4 (1 April 2006), 7–44. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.30.4.7
  • Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘The New Era of Counterforce: Technological Change and the Future of Nuclear Deterrence’, International Security 41/4 (1 April 2017), 9–49. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00273
  • Lindsay, Jon R., ‘Restrained by Design: The Political Economy of Cybersecurity’, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 19/6 (2017), 493–514. doi:10.1108/DPRG-05-2017-0023
  • Lindsay, Jon R. and Erik Gartzke, ‘Coercion through Cyberspace: The Stability-Instability Paradox Revisited’, in Kelly M. Greenhill and Peter Krause (eds.), Coercion: The Power to Hurt in International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press 2018), 179–203.
  • Lindsay, Jon R., Information Technology and Military Power (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2020).
  • Lindsay, Jon R. and Erik Gartzke, (eds.), Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity (New York: Oxford University Press 2019).
  • Long, Austin and Brendan Rittenhouse Green, ‘Stalking the Secure Second Strike: Intelligence, Counterforce, and Nuclear Strategy’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/1–2 (2014), 38–73. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.958150
  • Lyall, Jason, ‘Bombing to Lose? Airpower and the Dynamics of Violence in Counterinsurgency Wars,’ Working Paper, Social Science Research Network, 3 Sept., 2017. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2422170.
  • Lynn, William J., III, ‘Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon’s Cyberstrategy’, Foreign Affairs 89/5 (2010), 97–108.
  • Mackinder, H. J., ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’, The Geographical Journal 23/4 (1904), 421–37. doi:10.2307/1775498
  • Mahan, Alfred Thayer, The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783 (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. 1890).
  • McNeal, Gregory S., ‘Targeted Killing and Accountability’, Georgetown Law Journal 102 (March 2014), 681–794.
  • McNeill, William H., The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1982).
  • McRaven, William H., Spec Ops: Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare: Theory and Practice (New York: Presidio Press 1995).
  • Mearsheimer, John J., Conventional Deterrence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1985).
  • Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton 2001).
  • Mehta, Rupal N., ‘Extended Deterrence and Assurance in Multiple Domains’, in Jon R. Lindsay and Erik Gartzke (eds.), Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity (New York: Oxford University Press 2019), 234-56.
  • Meirowitz, Adam and Anne E. Sartori, ‘Strategic Uncertainty as a Cause of War’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3/4 (31 December 2008), 327–52. doi:10.1561/100.00008018
  • Moltz, James Clay, The Politics of Space Security: Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of National Interests (Stanford, Calif: Stanford Security Studies 2008).
  • Moltz, James Clay, Crowded Orbits: Conflict and Cooperation in Space (New York: Columbia University Press 2014).
  • Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Civilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2010).
  • Naylor, Sean, Not a Good Day to Die: The Untold Story of Operation Anaconda (New York: Penguin 2005).
  • Nolan, Cathal, The Allure of Battle: A History of How Wars Have Been Won and Lost (New York: Oxford University Press 2017).
  • North Atlantic Treaty Organization. ‘NATO Cyber Defence Factsheet.’ February 2018. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_02/20180213_1802-factsheet-cyber-defence-en.pdf
  • Nye, Joseph S., ‘Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace’, International Security 41/3 (1 January 2017), 44–71. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00266
  • Pape, Robert Anthony, Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1996).
  • Posen, Barry R., Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Risks (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1991).
  • Posen, Barry R., ‘Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony’, International Security 28/1 (2003), 5–46. doi:10.1162/016228803322427965
  • Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1984).
  • Post, Abigail, ‘Flying to Fail: Costly Signals and Air Power in Crisis Bargaining’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 63/4 (2019), 869–95. doi:10.1177/0022002718777043
  • Powell, Robert, ‘Bargaining Theory and International Conflict’, Annual Review of Political Science 5/1 (2002), 1–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.092601.141138
  • Poznansky, Michael and Evan Perkoski, ‘Rethinking Secrecy in Cyberspace: The Politics of Voluntary Attribution’, Journal of Global Security Studies 3/4 (1 October 2018), 402–16. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogy022
  • Press, Daryl G., Scott D. Sagan, and Benjamin A. Valentino, ‘Atomic Aversion: Experimental Evidence on Taboos, Traditions, and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons’, American Political Science Review 107/1 (February 2013), 188–206. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000597
  • Ramsay, Kristopher W., ‘Information, Uncertainty, and War’, Annual Review of Political Science 20/1 (2017), 505–27. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022729
  • Reiter, Dan, ‘Exploring the Bargaining Model of War’, Perspectives on Politics 1/1 (2003), 27–43. doi:10.1017/S1537592703000033
  • Rid, Thomas, Cyber War Will Not Take Place (London: Hurst 2013).
  • Roland, Alex, ‘Technology, Ground Warfare, and Strategy: The Paradox of the American Experience’, The Journal of Military History 55/4 (1994), 447–67. doi:10.2307/1985764
  • Ross, Robert S., ‘The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century’, International Security 23/4 (1999), 81–118. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.81
  • Rovner, Joshua, “Cyber War as an Intelligence Contest,” War on the Rocks (blog), 16 Sept., 2019. https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/cyber-war-as-an-intelligence-contest/
  • Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence: With a New Preface and Afterword (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 2008).
  • Schneider, Jacquelyn, ‘The Capability/Vulnerability Paradox and Military Revolutions: Implications for Computing, Cyber, and the Onset of War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 42/6 (19 September 2019), 841–63. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1627209
  • Sechser, Todd S. and Matthew Fuhrmann, Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy (New York: Cambridge University Press 2017).
  • Sechser, Todd S., Neil Narang, and Caitlin Talmadge, ‘Emerging Technologies and Strategic Stability in Peacetime, Crisis, and War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 42/6 (19 September 2019), 727–35. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1626725
  • Shah, Aqil, ‘Do U.S. Drone Strikes Cause Blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and Beyond’, International Security 42/4 (1 May 2018), 47–84. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00312
  • Slantchev, Branislav L., Military Threats: The Costs of Coercion and the Price of Peace (New York: Cambridge University Press 2011).
  • Slantchev, Branislav L. and Ahmer Tarar, ‘Mutual Optimism as a Rationalist Explanation of War’, American Journal of Political Science 55/1 (1 January 2011), 135–48. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00475.x
  • Smith, Merritt Roe and Leo Marx, (eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1994).
  • Snyder, Glenn H., ‘The Balance of Power and the Balance of Terror’, in Paul Seabury (ed.), The Balance of Power (San Francisco, CA: Chandler 1965), 184–201.
  • Spykman, Nicholas J., ‘Geography and Foreign Policy, I’, The American Political Science Review 32/1 (1938), 28–50. doi:10.2307/1949029
  • Stares, Paul B., The Militarization of Space: U.S. Policy, 1945–1984 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1985).
  • State Council Information Office, China’s Military Strategy (Beijing: The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China May 2015). http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-05/26/content_20820628.htm
  • Stevens, Tim, ‘A Cyberwar of Ideas? Deterrence and Norms in Cyberspace’, Contemporary Security Policy 33/1 (1 April 2012), 148–70. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.659597
  • Talmadge, Caitlin, ‘Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States’, International Security 41/4 (1 April 2017), 50–92. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00274
  • U. S. Army, FM 3-24: Counterinsurgency (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office 2006).
  • U.S. Army, The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028 (TRADOC Pamphlet. Fort Eustis, VA: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command 6 December 2018).
  • Ucko, David H., The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the U.S. Military for Modern Wars (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 2009).
  • United States, ‘National Security Strategy of the United States of America,’ White House Office, December 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
  • Valeriano, Brandon, Benjamin M. Jensen, and Ryan C. Maness, Cyber Strategy: The Evolving Character of Power and Coercion (New York: Oxford University Press 2018).
  • Wagner, R. Harrison., ‘Bargaining and War’, American Journal of Political Science 44/3 (2000), 469–84. doi:10.2307/2669259
  • Waldman, Thomas, War, Clausewitz and the Trinity (New York: Routledge 2016).
  • Walsh, James Igoe., The Effectiveness of Drone Strikes in Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorism Campaigns (Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute 26 September 2013). http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1167
  • Weigley, Russell F., The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 1973).
  • White, Hugh. ‘Losing the War in an Afternoon: Jutland 1916.’ The Strategist. Autralian Strategic Policy Institute, 13 May, 2016.
  • Winner, Langdon, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1977).
  • Wylie, J.C., Military Strategy: A General Theory of Power Control Edited by John B. Hattendorf. (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press 1989).
  • Zegart, Amy, ‘Cheap Fights, Credible Threats: The Future of Armed Drones and Coercion’, Journal of Strategic Studies 43/1 (28 February 2018), 6–46. doi:10.1080/01402390.2018.1439747

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.