The zero option and NATO’s dual-track decision: Rethinking the paradox

Bibliography

• Adomeit, Hannes, Imperial Overstretch: Germany in Soviet Policy from Stalin to Gorbachev. An Analysis Based on New Archival Evidence, Memoirs and Interviews 2nd (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bluth, Christoph, Britain, Germany, and Western Nuclear Strategy (Oxford, New York: Oxford UP 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Boutwell, Jeffrey, The German Nuclear Dilemma (Ithaca NY: Cornell UP 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Broer, Michael, Die nuklearen Kurzstreckenwaffen in Europa. Eine Analyse des deutsch-amerikanischen Streits über die Einbeziehung der SRINF in den INF-Vertrag und der SNF-Kontroverse (Frankfurt et al: Peter Lang 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Buteux, Paul, Strategy, Doctrine, and the Politics of Alliance. Theatre Nuclear Force Modernisation in NATO (Boulder, CO: Westview Press 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, Donald R., ‘‘The Emerging INF Agreement: A Case of Strategic Regression,’’, Strategic Review 15/3 (1987), 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Daalder, Ivo H., The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response. NATO Strategy and Theater Nuclear Forces since 1967 (New York: Columbia UP 1991).
   Google Scholar
• de Rose, François, ‘Brinkmanship at Reykjavik’, The Atlantic Community Quarterly 24/4 (1986–1987), 295–99.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, Thomas, Holger H. Mey, and Michael Rühle, ‘The New Germany and Nuclear Weapons’, in Patrick J. Garrity and Steven A. Maaranen (eds.), Nuclear Weapons in the Changing World. Perspectives from Europe, Asia, and North America (New York and London: Plenum Press 1992), 127–43.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Stephanie, ‘The Making of an Accidental Crisis. The United States and the NATO Dual-Track Decision of 1979’, Diplomacy & Statecraft 25/2 (2014), 331‑355.
   Google Scholar
• Gala, Marilena, ‘The Euromissile Crisis and the Centrality of the “Zero Option”’, in Leopoldo Nuti, Frédéric Bozo, Marie-Pierre Rey, and Bernd Rother (eds..), The Euromissile Crisis and the End of the Cold War (Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press 2015), 158–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gassert, Philipp, Tim Geiger, and Hermann Wentker, (eds.), Zweiter Kalter Krieg und Friedensbewegung. Der NATO-Doppelbeschluss in deutsch-deutscher und internationaler Perspektive (Munich: Oldenbourg 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Tim, ‘The NATO Double-Track Decision: Genesis and Implementation’, in Christoph Becker-Schaum, Philipp Gassert, Martin Klimke, Wilfried Mausbach, and Marianne Zepp (eds.), The Nuclear Crisis. The Arms Race, Cold War Anxiety, and the German Peace Movement of the 1980s (New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books 2016), 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• Goodby, James E., Choosing Zero: Origins of the INF Treaty, Pew Case, No. 319 (Washington DC: Georgetown University Institute for the Study of Diplomacy 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Green, Brendan Rittenhouse, The Revolution that Failed. Nuclear Competition, Arms Control, and the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, Walther F., ‘The INF Treaty, the Alliance, and the Failure of Strategic Realism’, Comparative Strategy 7/4 (1988), 345–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, Thomas E., The Last Great Nuclear Debate. NATO and Short-Range Nuclear Weapons in the 1980s (Basingstoke; New York: Macmillan, St. Martin’s Press 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Michael, ‘Reassurance and Deterrence: Western Defense in the 1980s’, Foreign Affairs 61/2 ( winter 1982), 309–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, Why Intelligence Fails. Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War (Ithaca and London: Cornell UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Karl, ‘Der Zerfall des sicherheitspolitischen Konsenses in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in Manfred Funke, et al. (ed..), Demokratie und Diktatur. Festschrift für Karl Dietrich Bracher (Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag 1987), 476–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Karl, ‘NATO’s Double-Track Decision, the Peace Movement, and Arms Control’, in Wolfgang Ischinger (ed.), Towards Mutual Security. Fifty Years of Munich Security Conference (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, Henry A., ‘The Future of NATO’, The Washington Quarterly 2/4 ( autumn 1979), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, Helmut, Erinnerungen 1982–1990 (Munich: Droemer Verlag 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, The Myth of the Nuclear Revolution. Power Politics in the Nuclear Age (Ithaca and London: Cornell UP 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Lutsch, Andreas, ‘Gleichgewicht vor Westbindung. Die Regierung Schmidt und die ‘Neutronenbombe’ (1977/78) – Eine Neubewertung’, Historische Zeitschrift 310/1 (2020), 52–89.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, John D., ‘The Purposes of Arms Control’, Texas National Security Review 2/1 (2018), 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Ernst-C., Die Null-Lösung für die nuklearen Mittelstreckensysteme. Westliche Nuklearpolitik zwischen Modernisierungs- und Abrüstungsorientierung. SWP Arbeitspapier 2562 (Ebenhausen: SWP, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Michael Legge, J., Theater Nuclear Weapons and the NATO Strategy of Flexible Response (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Nehring, Holger and Benjamin Ziemann, ‘Führen alle Wege nach Moskau? Der NATO-Doppelbeschluss und die Friedensbewegung – Eine Kritik’, Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 59/1 (2011), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, Leopoldo, ‘The Origins of the 1979 Dual Track Decision - a Survey’, in Leopoldo Nuti (ed.), The Crisis of Détente in Europe (London: Routledge 2009), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, Ilaria, ‘L’indépendance européenne en question: La France et la crise des euromissiles (1977–1987)’, Relations Internationales 178/2 (2019), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Susanne, The Germans and the INF Missiles. Getting Their Way in NATO’s Strategy of Flexible Response (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Clifford, ‘Reflexive Control in Soviet Military Planning’, in Brian P. Dailey and Patrick J. Parker (eds.), Soviet Strategic Deception (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; Hoover Institution Press 1987), 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Null-Lösung. Entscheidungsprozesse zu den Mittelstreckenwaffen 1970–1987 (Frankfurt: Campus 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Rühl, Lothar, Mittelstreckenwaffen in Europa: Ihre Bedeutung in Strategie, Rüstungskontrolle und Bündnispolitik (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Sayle, Timothy Andrew, Enduring Alliance. A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell UP 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, James, ‘The Impact of Nuclear Weapons on History’, The Washington Quarterly 16/4 (1993), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr, Kristina, ‘Helmut Schmidt and the Shaping of Western Security in the Late 1970s: The Guadeloupe Summit of 1979’, The International History Review 37/1 (2015), 167–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr, Kristina, The Global Chancellor. Helmut Schmidt and the Reshaping of International Order (Oxford: Oxford UP 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Spohr-Readman, Kristina, ‘Conflict and Cooperation in Intra-Alliance Nuclear Politics: Western Europe, America and the Genesis of Nato’s Dual-Track Decision, 1977-1979’, Journal of Cold War Studies 13/2 ( Spring 2011), 39–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, Kristan, Facing down the Soviet Union. Britain, the USA, NATO and Nuclear Weapons, 1976–1983 (Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, ‘The Structure of Great Power Politics, 1963–1975’, in Melvyn Leffler and Odd A. Westad (eds.), Cambridge History of the Cold War Vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2010), 482–402.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Ruud, ‘”A Mass Psychosis”. The Netherlands and NATO’s Dual-Track Decision, 1978‑1979’, Cold War History 12/3 (2012), 381–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Tim M., Zwischen Nachrüstung und Abrüstung. Die Nuklearwaffenpolitik der Christlich-Demokratischen Union Deutschlands zwischen 1977 und 1989 (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Nicholas J., Trusting Enemies: Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Wiegrefe, Klaus, Das Zerwürfnis. Helmut Schmidt, Jimmy Carter und die Krise der deutsch-amerikanischen Beziehungen (Berlin: Propyläen 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James Graham, The Triumph of Improvisation. Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War (Ithaca NY and London: Cornell UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Yarhi-Milo, Keren, Knowing the Adversary. Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton UP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘The History of NATO Theater Nuclear Force Policy: Key Findings from the Sandia Conference’, Journal of Strategic Studies 15/2 (1992), 228–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, David S., ‘Analysing International Nuclear Order’, International Affairs 83/3 (May 2007), 549–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar