A nuclear education: the origins of NATO’s Nuclear Planning Group

Bibliography

• Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department (New York: W. W. Norton), 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, Robert R. and Richard H. Immerman, Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy (New York: Oxford University Press), 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Burr. “The U.S. Nuclear Presence in Western Europe, 1954-1962.” National Security Archive, July 16, 2020. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2020-07-21/us-nuclear-presence-western-europe-1954-1962.
   Google Scholar
• Buteux, Paul, The Politics of Nuclear Consultation in NATO, 1965-1980 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Daalder, Ivo H., The Nature and Practise of Flexible Response: NATO Strategy and Theater Nuclear Forces since 1967 (New York: Columbia University Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence and Jeffrey H. Michaels, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Fourthed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, John Lewis, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War (New York:  Oxford University Press), 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., ‘The Myth of Flexible Response: United States Strategy in Europe during the 1960s’, The International History Review 23/4 (2001), 847–75. doi:10.1080/07075332.2001.9640953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, Francis J., Nuclear Weapons and American Grand Strategy (Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press), 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, Michael, ‘Cold War Angst: The Case of West-German Opposition to Rearmament and Nuclear Weapons’, in Hanna Schissler (ed.), The Miracle Years: A Cultural History of West Germany, 1949-1968 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press), 2001, 376–408.
   Google Scholar
• Haftendorn, Helga, NATO and the Nuclear Revolution: A Crisis of Credibility, 1966-1967 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, NATO, Britain, France, and the FRG: Nuclear Strategies and Forces for Europe, 1949-2000 (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice, ‘Alliance of Democracies and Nuclear Deterrence’, in Vojtech Mastny, Andreas Wenger, and Sven G. Holtsmark (eds.), War Plans and Alliances in the Cold War: Threat Perceptions in the East and West (New York, NY: Routledge), 2006, 193–217.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, Richard G. and Jack M. Holl, Atoms for Peace and War, 1953-1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission (Los Angeles: University of California Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Robert S., Norstad: Cold War NATO Supreme Commander: Airman, Strategist, Diplomat (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, Jeffrey H., ‘Visions of the Next War or Reliving the Last One? Early Alliance Views of War with the Soviet Bloc’, Journal of Strategic Studies (May 7 2020), 1–24. doi:10.1080/01402390.2020.1759554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery of Alamein, Bernard Law Montgomery, Memoirs (London: Collins), 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Pedlow, Gregory W. NATO Strategy Documents, 1949-1969, 1997. https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/intro.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, Andrew, ‘From Hardware to Software: The End of the MLF and the Rise of the Nuclear Planning Group’, in Andreas Wenger, Christian Nuenlist, and Anna Locher (eds.), Transforming NATO in the Cold War: Challenges beyond Deterrence in the 1960s (London: Routledge), 2007, 148–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sayle, Timothy Andrews, Enduring Alliance: A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sayle, Timothy Andrews, ‘We Do Not Wish to Be Obstructionist: How Canada Took and Kept a Seat on NATO’s Nuclear Planning Group’, in Susan Colbourn and Timothy Andrews Sayle (eds.), The Nuclear North: Histories of Canada in the Atomic Age (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press), 2020, 40–64.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbruner, John D., The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis. Revised edition. (Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press), 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stromseth, Jane E., The Origins of Flexible Response: NATO’S Debate over Strategy in the 1960s (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, History and Strategy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945-1963 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press), 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, Marc, The Cold War and After: History, Theory, and the Logic of International Politics (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press), 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Twigge, Stephen and Len Scott, Planning Armageddon: Britain, the United States and the Command of Western Nuclear Forces 1945-1964 (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, Robert Allen. ‘Ambiguous Legacy: The United States, Great Britain and the Foundations of NATO Strategy, 1948-1957’, PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 1991. ProQuest (91320509).
   Google Scholar