Are they reading Schelling in Beijing? The dimensions, drivers, and risks of nuclear-conventional entanglement in China

Bibliography

• Acton, James M., ‘Reclaiming Strategic Stability’, in Elbridge A. Colby and Michael S. Gerson (eds.), Strategic Stability: Contending Interpretations (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press 2013), 117–46.
   Google Scholar
• Acton, James M., Silver Bullet? Asking the Right Questions about Conventional Prompt Global Strike (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Acton, James M., ‘Russia and Strategic Conventional Weapons: Concerns and Responses’, The Nonproliferation Review 22/2 (2015), 141–54. doi:10.1080/10736700.2015.1105434
   Google Scholar
• Acton, James M. (ed.), Russian and Chinese Perspectives on Non-Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Acton, James M., ‘Escalation through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War’, International Security 43/1 ( Summer 2018), 56–99. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acton, James M., Is It a Nuke? Pre-Launch Ambiguity and Inadvertent Escalation (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Acton, James M., Tong Zhao, and Li Bin, ‘Reducing the Risks of Nuclear Entanglement’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 12 Sep. 2018, https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/09/12/reducing-risks-of-nuclear-entanglement-pub-77236.
   Google Scholar
• Arbatov, Alexey, Vladimir Dvorkin, and Petr Topychkanov, ‘Entanglement as A New Security Threat: A Russian Perspective’, in James M. Acton (ed.), Russian and Chinese Perspectives on Non-Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2017), 11–45.
   Google Scholar
• Blasko, Dennis J., ‘Mission Action 2010: Three Complex, Transregional, Integrated Joint Operations’, China Brief 10/22 (2010), 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Blasko, Dennis J., The Chinese Army Today: Tradition and Transformation for the 21st Century (New York, NY: Routledge 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. Elaine and Vincent A. Manzo, ‘Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Strategic Asset or Unusable Liability?’ INSS Strategic Forum, Feb. 2011, p. 263.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Zhengrong, [曹正荣], Wu Runbo [吴润波], and Sun Jianjun [孙建军], Informationized Joint Operations [信息化联合作战] (Beijing: PLA Press [解放军出版社] 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Michael S., ‘China’s Transition to a More Credible Nuclear Deterrent: Implications and Challenges for the United States’, Asia Policy 16/1 (Jul. 2013), 115–37. doi:10.1080/14799855.2012.686253
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Michael S., et al., China’s Incomplete Military Transformation: Assessing the Weaknesses of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Michael S. and Andrew S. Erickson, ‘The Conventional Missile Capabilities of China’s Second Artillery Force: Cornerstone of Deterrence and Warfighting’, Asian Security 8/2 (2012), 115–37. doi:10.1080/14799855.2012.686253
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Thomas, ‘The Meaning of the Nuclear Evolution: China’s Strategic Missile Force Modernization and Its Implications for the United States’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (Aug. 2012), 447–87. doi:10.1080/01402390.2012.714710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, Ron, ‘Conventional Missions for China’s Second Artillery Corps’, Comparative Strategy 30/3 (2011), 198–228. doi:10.1080/01495933.2011.587679
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Fiona S., ‘Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications Systems of the People’s Republic of China’, NAPSNet Special Reports, 18 Jul. 2019, https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/nuclear-command-control-and-communications-systems-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china/.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Fiona S. and M. Taylor Fravel, ‘Assuring Assured Retaliation: China’s Nuclear Posture and U.S.-China Strategic Stability’, International Security 40/2 ( Fall 2015), 7–50. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Fiona S. and M. Taylor Fravel, ‘Dangerous Confidence? Chinese Views on Nuclear Escalation’, International Security 44/2 ( Fall 2019), 61–109. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveleth, Decker, ‘Mapping the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force’, A Boy and His Blog, 2 Jul. 2020 https://www.aboyandhis.blog/post/mapping-the-people-s-liberation-army-rocket-force.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D., ‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41/1 (1997), 68–90. doi:10.1177/2F0022002797041001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiveson, Harold A., ‘The Dilemma of Theater Nuclear Weapons’, World Politics 33/2 (1981), 282–98. doi:10.2307/2010373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Dongsheng, [葛东升], ‘The Birth of a New-Type Missile Force [一支新型导弹部队的诞生]’, in The Second Artillery Political Department [第二炮兵政治部] (ed.), A Glorious Era: Looking Back on the Second Artillery’s Development and Advances in the Period of Reform and Opening [辉煌年代:回顾在改革开放中发展前进的第二炮兵] (Beijing: Central Literature Publishing House [中央文献出版社] 2008), 294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Bates, James C. Mulvenon, and Mark Stokes, ‘The Chinese Second Artillery Corps: Transition to Credible Deterrence’, in James C. Mulvenon and Andrew N. D. Yang (eds.), The People’s Liberation Army as Organization (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2002), 510–86.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Charles L. and Steve Fetter, ‘Should the United States Reject MAD? Damage Limitation and U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China’, International Security 41/1 ( Summer 2016), 49–98. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glosny, Michael, Christopher Twomey, and Ryan Jacobs, U.S.-China Strategic Dialogue, Phase VII Report (Monterey, CA: Center on Contemporary Conflict, Naval Postgraduate School May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Glosny, Michael, Christopher Twomey, and Ryan Jacobs, U.S.-China Strategic Dialogue, Phase VIII Report (Monterey, CA: Center on Contemporary Conflict, Naval Postgraduate School Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Avery, ‘First Things First: The Pressing Danger of Crisis Instability in U.S.-China Relations’, International Security 37/4 ( Spring 2013), 49–89. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompert, David C. and Phillip C. Saunders, The Paradox of Power: Sino-American Strategic Restraint in the Age of Vulnerability (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Dongdong, [胡冬冬], Song Feng [宋锋], and Ye Lei [叶蕾], ‘Analysis of the Development and Impact of Hypersonic Weapon Nuclear Weaponization[高超声速武器核武化发展态势及影响分析]’, Aerodynamic Missile Journal [飞航导弹] 1 (2020), 51–55. doi:10.16338/j.1009-1319.20190856
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Dongdong, [胡冬冬] and Ye Lei [叶蕾], ‘Development and Impact of the Nuclear Weaponization of Hypersonic Weapons: Making the Mechanisms of War More Complicated and More Dangerous [高超声速武器核武化发展态势及影响, 让战争机制更复杂而危险]’, 1 Apr. 2020, https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1662763034867300903&wfr=spider&for=pc.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 30/2 (Jan. 1978), 167–214. doi:10.2307/2009958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Kastner, Scott L., ‘Is the Taiwan Strait Still a Flashpoint? Rethinking the Prospects for Armed Conflict between China and Taiwan’, International Security 40/3 ( Winter 2015/16), 54–92. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber, Ronald and Robert Stein, Report of the Defense Science Task Force on Time Critical Conventional Strike from Strategic Standoff (Washington, DC: Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen Hans, M. and Matt Korda, ‘Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2019’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75/4 (2019), 171–78. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1628511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, Hans M. and Robert S. Norris, ‘Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2015’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71/4 (2015), 77–84. doi:10.1177/0096340215591247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, Hans M. and Robert S. Norris, ‘Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2016’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72/4 (2016), 205–11. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1194054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, Hans M., Robert S. Norris, and Matthew G. McKinzie, Chinese Nuclear Forces and U.S. Nuclear War Planning (Washington, DC: The Federation of American Scientists 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Roderick, ‘Integrating the PLA Rocket Force into Conventional Theater Operations’, China Brief 20/14 (2020), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jeffrey G., Paper Tigers: China’s Nuclear Posture (New York, NY: Routledge 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jeffrey G., ‘China’s Belated Embrace of MIRVs’, in Michael Krepon, Travis Wheeler, and Shane Mason (eds.), The Lure & Pitfalls of MIRVs: From the First to the Second Nuclear Age (Washington, DC: Stimson Center 2016), 96–117.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, John W. and Xue Litai, ‘Making China’s Nuclear War Plan’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68/5 (Sep./Oct. 2012), 45–65. doi:10.1177/2F0096340212459155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Bin, ‘Tracking Chinese Strategic Mobile Missiles’, Science and Global Security 15/1 (2007), 1–30. doi:10.1080/08929880701350197
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘The End of MAD? the Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy’, International Security 30/4 ( Spring 2006), 7–44. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.30.4.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘U.S. Nuclear Primacy and the Future of the Chinese Deterrent’, China Security 3/1 ( Winter 2007), 66–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press, ‘The Nukes We Need’, Foreign Affairs 88/6 (Nov./Dec. 2009), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Chong, ‘The Relationship between Nuclear Weapons and Conventional Military Conflicts’, in Li Bin and Tong Zhao (eds.), Understanding Chinese Nuclear Thinking (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2016), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘Drawing a Line between Conventional and Nuclear Weapons in China’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 5 May 2015, http://thebulletin.org/drawing-line-between-conventional-and-nuclear-weapons-china8304.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘PLA Reforms and China’s Nuclear Forces’, Joint Force Quarterly 83 (Oct. 2016), 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘Hard Constraints on a Chinese Nuclear Breakout’, The Nonproliferation Review 24/1–2 (2017), 13–30. doi:10.1080/10736700.2017.1371406
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘Career Paths in the PLA Rocket Force: What They Tell Us’, Asian Security 14/1 (2018), 1–19. doi:10.1080/14799855.2017.1422089
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘Making Sense of China’s Missile Forces’, in Phillip C. Saunders and Joel Wuthnow (eds.), Chairman Xi Remakes the PLA: Assessing Chinese Military Reforms (Washington, DC: NDU Press 2019), 393–435.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, David C., ‘The Dangerous Myths About China’s Nuclear Weapons’, War On The Rocks, 18 Sep. 2020, https://warontherocks.com/2020/09/the-dangerous-myths-about-chinas-nuclear-weapons/.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Austin and Brendan Rittenhouse Green, ‘Stalking the Secure Second Strike: Intelligence, Counterforce, and Nuclear Strategy’, Journal of Strategic Studies 38/1–2 (2015), 38–73. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.958150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, Rose, Anthony C Lopez, and Peter K Hatemi, ‘“Blunt Not the Heart, Enrage It”: The Psychology of Revenge and Deterrence’, Texas National Security Review 1/1 (2017), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Miasnikov, Yevgeny, ‘The Counterforce Potential of Precision-Guided Munitions’, in Alexei Arbatov and Vladimir Dvorkin (eds.), Nuclear Proliferation: New Technologies, Weapons, Treaties (Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center 2009), 84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvenon, James and David Finkelstein (ed.), China’s Revolution in Doctrinal Affairs: Emerging Trends in the Operational Art of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Narang, Vipin, Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, Barry, ‘The Third Front: Defence Industrialization in the Chinese Interior’, The China Quarterly 115 (Sep. 1988), 351–86. doi:10.1017/S030574100002748X
   Google Scholar
• Oded, Löwenheim and Gadi Heimann, ‘Revenge in International Politics’, Security Studies 17/4 (2008), 685–724. doi:10.1080/09636410802508055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress, 2017: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2017 (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress, 2019: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2019 (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress, 2020: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2020 (Washington, D.C.: Office of the Secretary of Defense 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Pawlyk, Oriana, ‘START Lanced the B-1s Nukes, but the Bomber Will Still Get New Bombs’, Military.com, 12 Jul. 2017, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/07/12/start-lanced-the-b-1s-nukes-but-bomber-will-still-get-new-bombs.html.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, William J. and Andy Weber, ‘Mr. President, Kill the New Cruise Missile’, The Washington Post, 15 Oct. 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mr-president-kill-the-new-cruise-missile/2015/10/15/e3e2807c-6ecd-11e5-9bfe-e59f5e244f92_story.html?utm_term=.7b826f39569a.
   Google Scholar
• Podvig, Pavel, ‘Blurring the Line between Nuclear and Nonnuclear Weapons: Increasing the Risk of Accidental Nuclear War?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72/3 (2016), 145–49. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1170363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, Joshua H., ‘Boost-Glide Weapons and US-China Strategic Stability’, The Nonproliferation Review 22/2 (2015), 155–64. doi:10.1080/10736700.2015.1119422
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., ‘Inadvertent Nuclear War?: Escalation and NATO’s Northern Flank’, International Security 7/2 ( Fall 1982), 28–54. doi:10.2307/2538432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Escalation (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, ‘Theoretical Foundations of Strategic Nuclear Deterrence’, Political Science Quarterly 100/1 ( Spring 1985), 75–96. doi:10.2307/2150861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, ‘Nuclear Deterrence and the Strategy of Limited Retaliation’, American Political Science Review 83/2 (1989), 503–19. doi:10.2307/1962402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Robert, Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Search for Credibility (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Rand, Robin, ‘The Obama Nuclear Deterrent Modernization Plan and Schedule’, Presentation to the House Armed Services Committee, Strategic Forces Subcommittee, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 14 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Redden, Mark E. and Phillip C. Saunders, Managing Sino-U.S. Air and Naval Interactions: Cold War Lessons and New Avenues of Approach (Washington, DC: NDU Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua, ‘Two Kinds of Catastrophe: Nuclear Escalation and Protracted War in Asia’, Journal of Strategic Studies 40/5 (2017), 696–730. doi:10.1080/01402390.2017.1293532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalman, Lora, China and the U.S. Nuclear Posture Review (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Saalman, Lora, ‘China: Lines Blur between Nuclear and Conventional Warfighting’, The Interpreter, 19 Dec. 2014, http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2014/12/19/China-Lines-blur-between-nuclear-and-conventional-warfighting.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Saalman, Lora, Prompt Global Strike: China and the Spear (Honolulu: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Apr. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Saalman, Lora, ‘China’s Calculus on Hypersonic Glide’, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 15 Aug. 2017, https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2017/chinas-calculus-hypersonic-glide.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., ‘The Perils of Proliferation: Organization Theory, Deterrence Theory, and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons’, International Security 18/4 (1994), 66–107. doi:10.2307/2539178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, Scott D., The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Phillip C., ‘U.S.-China Relations and Chinese Military Modernization’, in Avery Goldstein and Jacques deLisle (eds.), Security and US-China Relations: Differences, Dangers, and Dilemmas (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Phillip C. and David C. Logan, ‘China’s Regional Nuclear Capability, Non-Nuclear Strategic Systems, and Integration of Concepts and Operations’, in James Smith and Paul Bolt (eds.), China’s Strategic Arsenal: Worldview, Doctrine, and Systems (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Phillip C., ‘Defense, Military, and Security Issues as Drivers of U.S.-China Strategic Competition’, in Evan Medeiros (ed.), Managing Strategic Competition: Rethinking U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Phillip C. and Joel Wuthnow, ‘China’s Goldwater-Nichols? Assessing PLA Organizational Reforms’, Joint Force Quarterly 82/3rd Quarter (Jul. 2016), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, Eric, Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety (New York: Penguin 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P.W. and Ma Xiu, ‘China’s Ambiguous Missile Strategy Is Risky’, Eastern Arsenal (blog), Popular Science, 11 May 2020, https://www.popsci.com/story/blog-network/eastern-arsenal/china-nuclear-conventional-missiles/.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn H., Deterrence and Defense (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1961).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack, ‘Civil-Military Relations and the Cult of the Offensive, 1914 and 1984’, International Security 9/1 ( Summer 1984), 108–46. doi:10.2307/2538637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbruner, John, ‘Beyond Rational Deterrence: The Struggle for New Conceptions’, World Politics 28/2 (1976), 223–45. doi:10.2307/2009891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Mark, ‘PLA Rocket Force Leadership and Unit Reference’, Project 2049 Institute, 9 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Mark A. ‘China’s Offensive Missile Forces’, Transcript of Hearing Before the U.S.-China Economic Security and Review Commission, 1 Apr. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge, Caitlin, ‘Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States’, International Security 41/4 ( Spring 2017), 50–92. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge, Caitlin, ‘Beijing’s Nuclear Option: Why a U.S.-Chinese War Could Spiral Out of Control’, Foreign Affairs 97/6 (Nov./Dec. 2018), 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Philip E., Charles B. McGuire, and Gregory Mitchell, ‘Psychological Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence’, Annual Review of Psychology 42/1 (1991), 239–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.001323
   Google Scholar
• Tianliang, Xiao, [肖天亮] (ed.), The Science of Military Strategy [战略学] (Beijing: National Defense University Press [国防大学出版社] 2017).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Issues for 2008 and Beyond (Washington, D.C.: National Research Council of the National Academies of Science 2008). doi:10.17226/12061
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Photographic Interpretation Center, New-Generation CSS-2 IRBM Ground Support Equipment PRC (Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency Oct. 1979).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Photographic Interpretation Center, New Mobile Solid-Propellant MRBM Under Development, China (Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency Nov. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Jessica Chen, ‘How Hawkish Is the Chinese Public? Another Look at “Rising Nationalism” and Chinese Foreign Policy’, Journal of Contemporary China 28/119 (2019), 679–95. doi:10.1080/10670564.2019.1580427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, Amy F., ‘Monitoring and Verification in Arms Control’, Congressional Research Service, 23 Dec. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, Amy F., ‘Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues’, Congressional Research Service, 24 Feb. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Riqiang, ‘How China Practices and Thinks about Nuclear Transparency’, in Li Bin and Tong Zhao (eds.), Understanding Chinese Nuclear Thinking (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2016), 219–43.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaosong, Shou, [寿晓松] (ed.), The Science of Military Strategy [战略学] (Beijing: Academy of Military Science [军事科学出版社] 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoyong, Huo, [霍小勇] (ed.), Strategics of the Services [军种战略学] (Beijing: National Defense University Press [国防大学出版社] 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Yeaw, Christopher T., Andrew S. Erickson, and Michael S. Chase, ‘The Future of Chinese Nuclear Policy and Strategy’, in Toshi Yoshihara and James R. Holmes (eds.), Strategy in the Second Nuclear Age: Power, Ambition, and the Ultimate Weapon (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 2012), 53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Jixun, [于际训] (ed.), The Science of Second Artillery Campaigns [第二炮兵战役学] (Beijing: PLA Press [解放军出版社] 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yuliang, [张玉良] (ed.), The Science of Campaigns [战役学] (Beijing: National Defense University Press [国防大学出版社] 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Tong, ‘Conventional Counterforce Strike: An Option for Damage Limitation in Conflicts with Nuclear-Armed Adversaries?’, Science & Global Security 19/3 (2011), 195–222. doi:10.1080/08929882.2011.616146
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Tong, [赵通], ‘China and the Evolution of the International Nuclear Order [中国与国际核秩序的演化]’, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy [清华－卡内基全球政策中心], 13 Mar. 2016, http://carnegietsinghua.org/2016/03/13/zh-63020/iv4d.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Tong and Li Bin, ‘The Underappreciated Risks of Entanglement: A Chinese Perspective’, in James M. Acton (ed.), Russian and Chinese Perspectives on Non-Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2017), 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Zhibo, [邹治波], ‘Implications and Impacts of U.S.’s Withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty [美国退出《中导条约》的当代含意与影响]’, International Economic Review [国际经济评论] 1 (2020), 31–42.
   Google Scholar