The sixth RMA wave: Disruption in Military Affairs?

Bibliography

• Adams, Thomas, The Army After Next: The First Postindustrial Army (Westport, CT: Praeger 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Adamsky, Dima, ‘Through the Looking Glass: The Soviet Military-Technical Revolution and the American Revolution in Military Affairs’, Journal of Strategic Studies 31/2 (2008), 257–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Greg and Taniel Chan, ‘Artificial Intelligence and National Security’, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 6 Jul. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barsade, Itai and Michael Horowitz, ‘Artificial Intelligence beyond the Superpowers’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 16 Aug. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Stephen, The RMA and the Evidence: Assessing Theories of Future Warfare (Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defence Analyses 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Bitzinger, Richard, Transforming the US Military: Implications for the Asia-Pacific (Barton: Australian Strategic Policy Institute 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bitzinger, Richard, ‘The Revolution in Military Affairs and the Global Defence Industry: Reactions and Interactions’, Security Challenges 4/4 (2008), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blaker, James, Understanding the Revolution in Military Affairs: A Guide to America’s 21st Century Defence (Washington DC: Progressive Policy Institute 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Boot, Max, War Made New Technology: Warfare and the Course of History, 1500 to Today (New York: Gotham Books 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, John Sloan, Kevlar Legions: The Transformation of the United States Army 1989–2005 (Washington DC: United States Army, Center of Military History 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, Arnold W., Jr. and Jerry Harris Jr., ‘Presentation to the House Armed Services Committee: Air Force, Force Structure and Modernization Programs’, Department of the Air Force, 12 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, Mark et. al., ‘Advanced Materials and Manufacturing - Implications for Defence to 2040ʹ, Defence Science and Technology Group Report, Australia Department of Defence, 2018. https://www.dst.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/documents/DST-Group-GD-1022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Michael, Jeffrey Engstrom, Tai Ming Cheung, Kristen Gunness, Scott Warren Harold, Susan Puska, and Samuel Berkowitz, China’s Incomplete Military Transformation: Assessing the Weaknesses of the People’s Liberation Army (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘Introduction’, in Tai Ming Cheung (ed.), Forging China’s Military Might: A New Framework for Assessing Innovation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 2014), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘Innovation in China’s Defence Technology Base: Foreign Technology and Military Capabilities’, Journal of Strategic Studies 39/5–6 (2016), 728–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, Thomas Mahnken, and Andrew Ross, ‘Frameworks for Analysing Chinese Defence and Military Innovation’, SITC Policy Brief 27 (2011), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Jeffrey, ‘Another View of the Revolution in Military Affairs’, in John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt (eds.), Athena’s Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 1994), 99–140.
   Google Scholar
• Cordesman, Anthony and Paul Fredericksen, Is Defence Transformation Affordable? Cost Escalation of Major Weapons Programs (Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Warfare’, Chatham House Research Paper, 26 Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dahm, Michael, ‘Chinese Debates on the Military Utility of Artificial Intelligence’, War on the Rocks, 5 Jun. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• DARPA, ‘Strategic Technology Office Outlines Vision for Mosaic Warfare’, DARPA News, 4 Aug 2017. https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2017-08-04.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Zachary, ‘Artificial Intelligence on the Battlefield’, PRISM 8/2 (2019), 114–31.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army HQ, The Soviet Army: Operations and Tactics - Field Manual 100-2-1 (Washington DC: Department of Defence 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Doder, Dusko, ‘Ousted Soviet Chief of Staff Returns to Scene as Author’, The Washington Post, 10 Jun. 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, Peter and Andrew Ross, ‘The Revolution in Military Affairs: Transformation and the Defence Industry’, Security Challenges 4/4 (2008), 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, William, Transforming an Army at War: Designing the Modular Force 1991–2005 (Washington DC: Center for Military History 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, Andrew, ‘China’s Modernisation of Its Naval and Air Power Capabilities’, in Ashley Tellis and Travis Tanner (eds.), Strategic Asia 2012–13: China’s Military Challenge (Washington DC: The National Bureau of Asian Research 2012), 60–125.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Paul, ‘Techno-Nationalism in China-US Relations: Implications for Universities’, EAI Background Brief 1527, 30 Apr. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fravel, Taylor, ‘China’s New Military Strategy: Winning Informationized Local Wars,’ China Brief, 15/13, 2 Jul. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Freedberg, Sydney, Jr., ‘Inside Army Futures Command: CFT Chiefs Take Charge’, Breaking Defence, 14, Aug. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, The Transformation of Strategic Affairs (London: International Institute of Strategic Studies 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, Sara and Hugo Silva, ‘José Almeida and Eduardo Silva, ‘Hyperspectral Imaging for Real-Time Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maritime Target Detection’’, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 90 (2018), 551–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron, Beyond Air-Sea Battle: The Debate over US Military Strategy in Asia (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., ‘Competing with China’, Survival 60/3 (2018), 7–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, George and Meredith Friedman, The Future of War: Power, Technology, and American Dominance in the 21st Century (New York: Crown 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, Strategy and History: Essays on Theory and Practice (London: Routledge 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Tom and Pat Savage, ‘In Search of a 21st-Century Joint Warfighting Concept’, War on the Rocks Commentary, 12 Sept. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtov, Mel, ‘Swords into Market Shares: China’s Conversion of Military Industry to Civilian Production’, The China Quarterly 134 (1993), 213–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagel, Chuck, ‘Memorandum - The Defence Innovation Initiative’, Office of the Secretary of Defence, 15 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T.X., ‘Technologies Converge and Power Diffuses: The Evolution of Small, Smart, and Cheap Weapons’, CATO Institute Policy Analysis 786, 27 Jan. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael, ‘The Promise and Peril of Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 23 Apr. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchens, Michael E. (et.al.), ‘Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons: A New Joint Operational Concept’, Joint Forces Quarterly 84, 27 Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Strategic Studies, ‘Quantum Computing and Defence’, in IISS, The Military Balance 2019 (London: Routledge 2019), 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• James, Andrew, ‘Emerging Technologies and Military Capability’, in Richard Bitzinger (ed.), Emerging Critical Technologies and Security in the Asia-Pacific (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2016), 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Benjamin and John Paschkewitz, ‘Mosaic Warfare: Small and Scalable are Beautiful’, War on the Rocks, 23 Dec. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, Elsa, ‘Innovation in the New Era of Chinese Military Power’, The Diplomat, 25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kipp, Jacob, ‘The Russian Military and the Revolution in Military Affairs: A Case of the Oracle of Delphi or Cassandra?’, US Foreign Military Studies Office Paper. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kober, Avi, ‘The Israel Defence Forces in the Second Lebanon War: Why the Poor Performance?’, Journal of Strategic Studies 31/1 (2008), 3–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, Andrew, The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (Washington DC: Office of Net Assessment 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, Andrew, ‘Defence Transformation - Testimony for the US Senate Committee on Armed Services’, 9 Apr. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, Andreas and Jean-Marc Rickli, Surrogate Warfare: The Transformation of War in the Twenty-First Century (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Chung Min, Fault Lines in a Rising Asia (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas, ‘A Framework for Examining Long-Term Strategic Competition between Major Powers’, SITC Research Brief, Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas and James Fitzsimonds, ‘Tread-Heads or Technophiles Army Officer Attitudes toward Transformation’, Parameters 34/2 (2004), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Martinage, Robert, Toward a New Offset Strategy: Exploiting US Long-Term Advantages to Restore US Global Power Projection Capability (Washington DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, Juha Kai, ‘Engaging a Moving Organisation - Modelling a Military Enterprise with Architecture Tools’, PhD Dissertation, Aalto University School of Science and Technology. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mattis, James, ‘USJFCOM Commander’s Guidance for Effects-Based Operations’, Joint Forces Quarterly 51 (2006), 106.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Steven, ‘America’s Defence Transformation: A Conceptual and Political History’, Defence Studies 6/1 (2006), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Steven and James Kievit, Strategy and the Revolution in Military Affairs: From Theory to Policy (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Paul, Network Centric Warfare and Coalition Operations: The New Military Operating System (London: Routledge 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson, ‘Thinking about Revolutions in Military Affairs’, Joint Forces Quarterly 16 ( Summer 1997), 103–11.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson and MacGregor Knox, ‘Thinking about Revolutions in Warfare’, in MacGregor Knox and Williamson Murray (eds.), The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• National Defence Panel, Transforming Defence: National Security in the 21st Century (Washington DC: US Department of Defence 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, Shimon, In Pursuit of Military Excellence: The Evolution of Operational Theory (London: Frank Cass 1996).
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Ronald, ‘Defence Transformation: Background and Oversight Issues for Congress’, CRS Report for Congress 322238. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Soviet Analysis, ‘Trends and Developments in Warsaw Pact Theater Forces 1985–2000ʹ, National Intelligence Estimate No. 11-14. 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Joint Vision 2010ʹ, US Department of Defence, Jul. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Joint Vision 2020: America’s Military - Preparing for Tomorrow’, US Department of Defence, Jun. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the President of the US, The National Security Strategy 2017 (Washington DC: The White House 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Air Force, ‘The US Air Force Transformation Flight Plan,’ US Air Force Future Concepts and Transformation Division, Nov. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defence, ‘Transformation Planning Guidance’, US Department of Defence, Apr. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defence, The National Defence Strategy 2018 (Washington DC: Department of Defence 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Navy, ‘Sea Power 21: Projecting Decisive Joint Capabilities’, US Department of the Navy, Oct. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ogarkov, Nikolai, Istoriya Uchit Bditelnosti (Moscow: Voenizdat 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, William, ‘The Emerging US System-of-Systems’, Strategic Forum 63 (1996), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Geoffrey, ‘Military Revolution 1560-1660–A Myth?’, Journal of Modern History 48/2 (1976), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin, Cheryl, ‘Work: Human-Machine Teaming Represents Defence Technology Future’, Department of Defence News, 8 Nov. 2015. http://www.defence.gov/News/Article/Article/628154/work-human-machine-teaming-represents-defence-technology-future
   Google Scholar
• Pellerin, Cheryl, ‘Deputy Secretary Discusses Third Offset, First Organisational Construct’, Department of Defence News, 21 Sept. 2016. http://www.defence.gov/News/Article/Article/951689
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Philip, ‘The Soviet Conceptual Framework for the Application of Military Power’, Naval War College Review 34/3 (1981), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Philip, ‘The Modernisation of Soviet Armed Forces’, NATO’s 16 Nations 31/4 (1984), 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Raska, Michael, Military Innovation and Small States: Creating a Reverse Asymmetry (London: Routledge 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Raska, Michael, ‘Singapore’s Next-Frontier Defence Innovations’, The Straits Times, 27 Jun. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Raska, Michael, ‘Strategic Competition for Emerging Military Technologies: Comparative Paths and Patterns’, PRISM 8/3 (2020), 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• Raska, Michael and Richard Bitzinger, ‘Strategic Contours of China’s Arms Transfers’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 14/1 (2020), 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Kevin, Defence Transformation: To What? For What? (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Phillip C. and Joel Wuthnow, ‘China’s Goldwater-Nichols? Assessing PLA Organizational Reforms’, Joint Forces Quarterly 82, Jul. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul and Michael C. Horowitz, ‘An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems’, Center for a New American Security, 13 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Norton, ‘Remarks to the National Defence University Distinguished Lecture Program’, 15 Dec. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shimko, Keith, The Iraq Wars and America’s Military Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Vego, Milan, ‘Effects-Bases Operations: A Critique’, Joint Forces Quarterly 41/2 (2006), 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, Timothy, ‘Security the Third Offset Strategy - Priorities for the Next Secretary of Defence’, Joint Forces Quarterly 82/3 (2016), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Barry, ‘What Is the Revolution in Military Affairs?’, Northrop Grumman Analysis Center 351 (1995), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zenko, Micah, ‘Millennium Challenge: The Real Story of a Corrupted Military Exercise and Its Legacy’, War on the Rocks Commentary, 5 Nov. 2015.
   Google Scholar