A conceptual framework of defence innovation

Bibliography

• Abramovitz, Moses, ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History 46/386 (June 1986), 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan Jones, Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Black, Jeremy, War and Technology (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, ‘The Chinese Defence Economy’s Long March from Imitation to Innovation’, Journal of Strategic Studies 34/3 (June 2011), 325–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, Innovate to Dominate: The Making of the Chinese Techno-Security State and Implications for the Global Order (Irhaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Tai Ming, Thomas G. Mahnken, and Andrew L. Ross, ‘Frameworks for Analyzing Chinese Defense and Military Innovation’, in Tai Ming Cheung (ed.), Forging China’s Military Might: A New Framework for Assessing Innovation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 2014, 15–46).
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, Charles, ‘Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges’, in Jan Fagerberg, Richard Nelson, and David Mowery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004), 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, Charles and Bjorn Johnson, ‘Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation’, in Charles Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (Oxford: Routledge 2005), 41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Rebecca and Kim Clark, ‘Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35/1 (March 1990), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C., The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher Weible, and Karin Ingold, ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program’, in Christopher Weible (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (New York: Routledge 2018), 135-171.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Bryan, Frank Baumgartner, and James True, ‘Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority, 1947–1995’, The Journal of Politics 60/1 (February 1998), 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2647999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, MacGregor and Williamson Murray, Eds, The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300-2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Richard, Ed, National Innovation Systems (New York: Oxford University Press 1993).
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor, ‘Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework’, in Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, 2nded. (Boulder, Co: Westview 2007), 21–64.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul and Christopher Weible, ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework’, in Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, Co: Westview 2007), 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, Edella, ‘A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes’, in Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, Co: Westview 2007), 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Mark Zachary, The Politics of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher, Tanya Heikkila, Peter deLeon, and Paul Sabatier, ‘Understanding and Influencing the Policy Process’, Policy Sciences 45/1 (March 2012), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar