Looking back to look forward: Autonomous systems, military revolutions, and the importance of cost

Bibliography

• 116th Congress, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1790.
   Google Scholar
• Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel (Stanford: Stanford UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Douglas and Peter T. Leeson, ’Institutionally Constrained Technology Adoption: Resolving the Longbow Puzzle’, The Journal of Law & Economics 58/3 (2015), 683–715. doi:10.1086/684231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacevich, Andrew J., ’Preserving the Well-Bred Horse’, The National Interest 37 (1994), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaud, Jean Paul, The Army of the French Revolution (Princeton: Princeton UP 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Boot, Max, War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today (New York: Penguin 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet, Antoine, The Scientific Way of Warfare: Order and Chaos on the Battlefields of Modernity (Oxford: Oxford UP 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Brose, Christian, ’The New Revolution in Military Affairs: War’s Sci-Fi Future’, Foreign Affairs 98 (2019), 122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbach, David and Brendan Rittenhouse Green, ’The Technology of the Revolution in Military Affairs’, in Harvey M. Sapolsky, Benjamin H. Friedman, and Brendan R. Green (ed.), US Military Innovation Since the Cold War (New York, NY: Routledge 2009), 30–58.
   Google Scholar
• Calcara, Antonio, Andrea Gilli, Mauro Gilli, Raffaele Marchetti, and Ivan Zaccagnini, ’Why Drones Have Not Revolutionized War: The Enduring Hider-Finder Competition in Air Warfare’, International Security 46/4 (2022), 130–71. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Andrew, Kill Chain: The Rise of the High-Tech Assassins (London: Picador Books 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Eliot, ’A Revolution in Warfare’, Foreign Affairs 75/2 (March-April 1996), 37–54. doi:10.2307/20047487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, Owen, The Wars of the French Revolution and Napoleon, 1792-1815 (New York, NY: Routledge 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, Summary of the National Defense Strategy of the United States of America, 2018. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, David A., ’Effects-Based Operations’, Air and Space Power Journal 20/1, (2006), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, David A., Unmanned Aircraft Systems Taking Strategy to Task (Washington: National Defense University 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, David, ‘Long Range Strike More Potent, More Survivable, Cheaper’, Breaking Defense, January 2017. https://breakingdefense.com/2017/01/long-range-strike-more-potent-more-survivable-cheaper/.
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, Dave and Mike Francisco, ’Air Force ISR Operations: Hunting Versus Gathering’, Air & Space Power Journal 24/4, (2010), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Christopher, Siege Warfare: The Fortress in the Early Modern World 1494-1660 (New York, NY: Routledge 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Peter, ’Time X Technology X Tactics= RMA: Why We Need a Revolution in Military Affairs and How to Begin It!’, Australian Defence Force Journal 116 (1996), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, John, The Social History of the Machine Gun (Baltimore: JHU Press 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Eversden, Andrew, ’Networks As Center of Gravity: Project Convergence Highlights Military’s New Battle With Bandwidth’, Breakingdefense.com, November 23, 2021. https://breakingdefense.com/2021/11/networks-as-center-of-gravity-project-convergence-highlights-militarys-new-battle-with-bandwidth/
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Donald, Bowmen of England (New York, NY: Grub Street Publishers 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimonds, James and Jan M. Van Tol, Revolutions in Military Affairs (Washington: Office of the Secretary of Defense 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Franke, ‘Ulrike Esther “The Unmanned Revolution: How Drones are Revolutionising Warfare”’, PhD dissertion, Oxford Univ., 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Freedberg, Sydney, ‘War Without Fear: DepSecDef Work on How AI Changes Conflict,’ Breaking Defense, May 31, 2017. https://breakingdefense.com/2017/05/killer-robots-arent-the-problem-its-unpredictable-ai/
   Google Scholar
• Friend, Alice Hunt, ‘Creating Requirements: Emerging Military Capabilities, Civilian Preferences, and Civil-Military Relations’, PhD dissertation, American Univ., 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Emily and Thomas Mahnken, (eds.), The Information Revolution in Military Affairs in Asia (New York: Springer 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, Strategy for Chaos: Revolutions in Military Affairs and the Evidence of History, (London: Frank Cass 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gropman, Alan, The Big L: American Logistics in World War II (Washington: National Defense University 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, Geoffrey, ’Inventing the Railroad and Rifle Revolution: Information, Military Innovation and the Rise of Germany’, Journal of Strategic Studies 27/2 (2004), 243–71. doi:10.1080/0140239042000255913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonsky, David, ’U.S. Military Doctrine and the Revolution in Military Affairs’, Parameters 24/3 (1994), 18–36. doi:10.55540/0031-1723.1711
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Patrick B., ’Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns’, International Security 36/4 (2012), 47–79. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaney, Thomas A. and Eliot A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey: Weapons, Tactics, and Training and Space Operations (Arlington, VA: Office of the Secretary of the Air Force 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, Frank, ’Exploiting the Military Technical Revolution: A Concept for Joint Warfare’, Strategic Review 20/2 (1992), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert and Joseph S. Nye Jr., ’Power and Interdependence in the Information Age’, Foreign Affairs 77 (1998), 81. doi:10.2307/20049052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingra, Mahinder, ’The Trace Italienne and the Military Revolution during the Eighty Years War, 1567-1648’, The Journal of Military History 57/3 (1993), 431. doi:10.2307/2943987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, Macgregor and Williamson Murray, (eds.), The Dynamics of Military Revolution,1300-2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, Andrew F., Jr., The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah, Taxing Wars: The American Way of War Finance and the Decline of Democracy (Oxford: Oxford UP 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Landers, John, ’The Destructiveness of Pre-Industrial Warfare: Political and Technological Determinants’, Journal of peace research 42/4 (2005), 455–70. doi:10.1177/0022343305054091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Kai-Fu, ’The Third Revolution in Warfare’, The Atlantic, September 11, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Libel, Tamir and Emily Boulter, ’Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Israel Defense Forces: A Precursor to a Military Robotic Revolution?’, The RUSI Journal 160/2 (2015), 68–75. doi:10.1080/03071847.2015.1036550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin-Greenberg, Erik, ’Wargame of Drones: Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Crisis Escalation’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 66 (2022), 00220027221106960. doi:10.1177/00220027221106960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, John A., Feeding Mars: Logistics in Western Warfare from the Middle Ages to the Present (New York: Routledge 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, Simon Paul, Revolutionary Armies in the Modern Era: A Revisionist Approach (New York: Routledge 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas, Technology and the American Way of War (New York: Columbia UP 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas and James Fitzsimonds, The Limits of Transformation: Officer Attitudes Toward the Revolution in Military Affairs (Newport, RI: Naval War College Press 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Maniikan, Mary, ’Becoming Unmanned: The Gendering of Lethal Autonomous Warfare Technology’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 16/1 (2014), 48–65. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.746429
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Jessica, ’The Information Revolution’, Foreign Policy 119 (2000), 63–65. doi:10.2307/1149529
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Steven., Strategy and the Revolution in Military Affairs: From Theory to Policy (New York: DIANE Publishing 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Steven, Armed Conflict in the 21st Century: The Information Revolution and Post-Modern Warfare (Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Steven and James Kievit, Strategy and the Revolution in Military Affairs: From Theory to Policy (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Millett, Alan and Williamson Murray, (eds.), Military Effectiveness: Volume 2, The Interwar Period (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Williamson, Thinking About Revolutions in Military Affairs (Washington: Assistant Secretary of Defense Public Affairs 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S., Jr. and William A. Owens, ’America’s Information Edge’, Foreign Affairs 75 (1996), 23–35. doi:10.2307/20047486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, Michael, Technological Change and the Future of Warfare (Brookings: Washington D.C 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, John Andreas, John Warden and the Renaissance of American Air Power (Washington: Potomac Books 1997).
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Ronald, Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicle: Background and Issues for Congress (Washington: U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, William, The American Revolution in Military Affairs (Washington: Joint Chiefs of Staff 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Geoffrey, (ed.), The Cambridge History of Warfare, (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, David, The Business of War: Military Enterprise and Military Revolution in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pernin, Christopher G., Elliot Axelband, Jeffrey A. Drezner, Brian Barber Dille, John Gordon IV, Bruce Held, K. Scott McMahon, Walter L. Perry, Christopher Rizzi, Akhil R. Shah, Peter A. Wilson, and Jerry M. Sollinger, Lessons from the Army’s Future Combat Systems Program (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Gervase, ’Longbow and Hackbutt: Weapons Technology and Technology Transfer in Early Modern England’, Technology and Culture 40/3 (1999), 576–93. doi:10.1353/tech.1999.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry, ’Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power’, International Security 18/2 (1993), 83–84. doi:10.2307/2539098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Michael, The Military Revolution, 1560-1660 (New York: Routledge 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Clifford J., (ed.), The Military Revolution Debate: Readings on the Military Transformation of Early Modern Europe, (New York: Westview Press 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Stephen Peter, ’The Impact of the Office of Net Assessment on the American Military in the Matter of the Revolution in Military Affairs’, Journal of Strategic Studies 33/4 (2010), 469–82. doi:10.1080/01402390.2010.489704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul, Army of None (New York: W.W. Norton Company 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Schev, Kenneth and David Stasavage, ’The Conscription of Wealth: Mass Warfare and the Demand for Progressive Taxation’, International Organization 64/4 (2010), 529–61. doi:10.1017/S0020818310000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jacquelyn, ’The Capability/Vulnerability Paradox and Military Revolutions: Implications for Computing, Cyber, and the Onset of War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 42/6 (2019), 841–63. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1627209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jacquelyn and Julia Macdonald, US Public Support for Drone Strikes (Washington, DC: Center for New American Security 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Schwing, Richard, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles-Revolutionary Tools in War and Peace (Carlisle Barracks: Army War College 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Shimko, Keith, The Iraq Wars and America’s Military Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, Dennis, ’The Retaming of Bellona: Prussia and the Institutionalization of the Napoleonic Legacy, 1815-1876’, The Journal of Military History 44/2 (1980), 57. doi:10.2307/1986599
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter, ‘A Revolution Once More: Unmanned Systems and the Middle East’, Brookings Institute, October 29, 2009. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/a-revolution-once-more-unmanned-systems-and-the-middle-east/
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter, Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (New York: Penguin 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, Elinor, Revolution in Military Affairs (McGill: McGill-Queen’s Press 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Smit, Wim and John Grin, Military Technological Innovation and Stability in a Changing World: Politically Assessing and Influencing Weapon Innovation and Military Research and Development (Charlotte: Virginia UP 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Spigelmire, Michael and Timothy Baxter, Unmanned Aircraft Systems And the Next War (Redstone Arsenal: Office of the Project Manager Unmanned Aircraft Systems 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, M.J. and Robert Hardy, The Great Warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose (London: Sutton 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg, Adam, ’Managing the Unmanned Revolution in the US Air Force’, Orbis 51/2 (2007), 251–65. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2007.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Sukman, Daniel, ’Lethal Autonomous Systems and the Future of Warfare’, Canadian Military Journal 16/1, (2015), 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tallet, Frank, War and Society in Early Modern Europe: 1495-1715 (New York, NY: Routledge 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Tilford, Earl, Jr., The Revolution in Military Affairs: Prospects and Cautions (Carlisle Barracks: Army War College Strategic Studies Institute 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992 (New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, Alven and Heidi Toffler, War and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21^st Century (Boston: Little, Brown 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, James Igoe, ’Precision Weapons, Civilian Casualties, and Support for the Use of Force’, Political Psychology 36/5 (2015), 507–23. doi:10.1111/pops.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden, John A., The Air Campaign: Planning for Combat. Fort McNair: National Defense University Press: Universe, (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Warwo, Geoffrey, The Austro-Prussian War: Austria’s War with Prussia and Italy in 1866 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, Richard, Predator: The Secret Origins of the Drone Revolution (New York: Henry Holt and Company 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wiest, Andrew, Haig: The Evolution of a Commander (New York: Potomac Books, Inc 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Worcester, Maxim, ’Autonomous Warfare: A Revolution in Military Affairs’, ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defence and International Security 340 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski, Rosella Capella, How States Pay for Wars (Cornell: Cornell UP 2016).
   Google Scholar