Counterinsurgency as fad: America’s rushed engagement with irregular warfare

References

• Andrade, Dale, ’Westmoreland Was Right: Learning the Wrong Lessons from the Vietnam War’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 19/2 (June 2008), 145–81. doi:10.1080/09592310802061349.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, Dale and James H. Willbanks, ’CORDS/Phoenix: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Vietnam for the Future’, Military Review 86/2 (March-April 2006), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, James A., (“Jimmy”), ‘The War on Terrorism: Countering Global Insurgency in the 21st Century’, Dec. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Stephen, Jeffrey A. Friedman, and Jacob N. Shapiro, ’Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007?’, International Security 37/1 ( Summer 2012), 7–40. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaufarb, Douglas S., The Counterinsurgency Era: U.S. Doctrine and Performance, 1950 to the Present (NY: The Free Press 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Buley, Benjamin, The New American Way of War: Military Culture and the Political Utility of Force (New York: Routledge 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michael A., ’The Myth of a Kinder, Gentler War’, World Policy Journal 27/1 (2010), 75–86. doi:10.1162/wopj.2010.27.1.75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher, Rebooting Clausewitz: “On War” in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford UP 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Conrad C., Cassandra in Oz: Counterinsurgency and Future War (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Degregori, Carlos Iván, How Difficult It is to Be God: Shining Path’s Politics of War in Peru, 1980–1999 (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, Clandestine Political Violence (New York: Cambridge UP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, Gian, Wrong Turn: America’s Deadly Embrace of Counterinsurgency (New York: The New Press 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gersovitz, Mark and Norma Kriger, ’What is a Civil War? A Critical Review of Its Definition and (Econometric) Consequences’, The World Bank Research Observer 28 (2013), 159–90. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkt005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumz, Jonathan E., ’Reframing the Historical Problematic of Insurgency: How the Professional Military Literature Created a New Literature and Missed the Past’, Journal of Strategic Studies 32/4 (2009), 553–88. doi:10.1080/01402390902986972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, Michael, The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan (NY: Blue Rider Press/Penguin 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice and Eitan Shamir, eds., Insurgencies and Counterinsurgencies: National Styles and Strategic Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Bruce, Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2004). https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP127.html
   Google Scholar
• Joint and Coalition Operational Analysis, Decade of War, Volume I: Enduring Lessons from the Past Decade of Operations (Washington, DC: CJCS J-7 15 June 2012). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA570341.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff, Counterinsurgency (Washington DC: Department of Defense 25 April 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Fred, The Insurgents: David Petraeus and the Plot to Change the American Way of War (NY: Simon & Schuster 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David, ’Countering Global Insurgency’, Journal of Strategic Studies 28/4 (2005), 597–617. doi:10.1080/01402390500300956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafeber, Walter, ’The Reagan Administration and Revolutions in Central America’, Political Science Quarterly 99/1 ( Spring 1984), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2150256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, Charles and José Pedro Zúquete, The Struggle for the World: Liberation Movements for the 21^st Century (Stanford, CA: Stanford UP 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Long, Austin, Doctrine of Eternal Recurrence: The U.S. Military and Counterinsurgency Doctrine, 1960-1970 and 2003-2006 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND 2008). https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP200.html
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, Jason, ’Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy’s Impact on War Outcomes and Duration’, International Organization 64/1 (2010), 167–92. doi:10.1017/S0020818309990208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Edward A., The Cold War’s Last Battlefield: Reagan, the Soviets, and Central America (Albany: State UP of New York 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas A., ’A Model Counterinsurgency: Uribe’s Colombia (2002-2006) Vs. FARC’, Military Review 87/2 (March-April 2007), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas A. and Kirklin J. Bateman, eds., Perspectives on the American Way of War: The U.S. Experience in Irregular Conflict (London: Routledge 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas A. and David H. Ucko, ’Gray Zone Conflict: China Revisits the Past’, Small Wars and Insurgencies 32/2 (March 2021), 181–204. doi:10.1080/09592318.2021.1870422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas A. and David H. Ucko, ’Gray Zone in Red: The Threat from China’s Political Warfare Past’, The Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International 26/3 (2021), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, John J., The Art of Counter-Revolutionary War (Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Menkhaus, Ken, ‘Somalia: State Collapse and the Threat of Terrorism’, Adelphi Paper 364, (Oxford: Oxford UP for the International Institute for Strategic Studies 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, Jeffrey H., ’Managing Global Counterinsurgency: The Special Group (CI) 1962–1966’, Journal of Strategic Studies 35/1 (2012), 33–61. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.592002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, Sean, ‘After Years of Fighting Insurgencies, the Army Pivots to Training for a Major War’, Yahoo! News, 30 Oct., 2018.
   Google Scholar
• O’dowd, Ed, ’’what Kind of War is This’?’, Journal of Strategic Studies 37/6–7 (2014), 1027–1049. doi:10.1080/01402390.2014.891982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, Carlos and Thomas A. Marks, ’Colombia: Changing Strategy Within the Struggle’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 25/2 (2014), 354–71. doi:10.1080/09592318.2014.903641.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, Carlos Alberto, Thomas A. Marks, and David H. Ucko, ’Colombia and the War-To-Peace Transition: Cautionary Lessons from Other Cases’, Military Review 96/4 (July-August 2016), 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Porch, Douglas, Counterinsurgency: Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War (New York: Cambridge UP 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Quadrennial Defense Review 2014, 4 Mar., 2014, (Washington DC: U.S. Department of Defense). https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/docs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, William, Warfare in Independent Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Condoleezza, ‘Iraq and U.S. Policy’, Opening Remarks before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 19 Oct. (Washington DC 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rich, Paul B. and Isabelle Duyvesteyn, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency, Routledge Handbooks Series (London: Routledge 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rodman, Peter, More Precious Than Peace: Fighting and Winning the Cold War in the Third World (NY: Scribner 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Hy S., Afghanistan and the Troubled Future of Unconventional Warfare (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James M., ed., Deciding to Intervene: The Reagan Doctrine and American Foreign Policy (Durham, NC: Duke UP 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Summary of the Irregular Warfare Annex to the National Defense Strategy (Washington DC: U.S. Department of Defense 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Tripodi, Chris and Matthew Wiger, ’Worthless COIN? Why the West Should Keep Studying Counterinsurgency’, Modern War Institute, 26 July, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, ‘President’s Address to the Nation’, 10 Jan., 2007, (Washington DC).
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., ’Innovation or Inertia: The U.S. Military and the Learning of Counterinsurgency’, Orbis 52/2 ( Spring 2008), 290–310. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2008.01.008.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the U.S. Military for Modern Wars (Washington DC: Georgetown UP 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., ’Counterinsurgency After Afghanistan: A Concept in Crisis’, PRISM 3/1 (2011), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., ’Critics Gone Wild: Counterinsurgency as the Root of All Evil’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 25/1 (2014), 161–79. doi:10.1080/09592318.2014.893972.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., ’’the People are Revolting’: An Anatomy of Authoritarian Counterinsurgency’, Journal of Strategic Studies 39/1 (2016), 29–61. doi:10.1080/01402390.2015.1094390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., The Insurgent’s Dilemma: A Struggle to Prevail (London: Hurst; New York: Oxford University Press 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H. and Thomas A. Marks, ‘Redefining Irregular Warfare: Legitimacy, Coercion, and Power’, Modern Warfare Institute, 18 Oct., 2022, https://mwi.usma.edu/redefining-irregular-warfare-legitimacy-coercion-and-power/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force, Doctrine Document 2-3 Irregular Warfare 1 Aug., 2007, https://fas.org/irp/doddir/usaf/afdd2-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, Directive 3000.05: Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations (Washington DC: Department of Defense 2005).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, Irregular Warfare (IW) Joint Operating Concept 1.0, 11 Sept., 2007, (Washington DC), https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_iw_v1.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162020-260.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Army, FM 3-0, Operations (Washington DC: U.S. Army 2008).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Army, FM 3-0, Operations 1 Oct., 2022, (Washington DC).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Army, FM 3-0, Operations, 1 Oct., 2022, (Washington DC).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Gregory, ’Anatomy of a Successful COIN Operation: OEF-Philippines and the Indirect Approach’, Military Review 86/6 (November-December 2006), 2–12.
   Google Scholar