2,156
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Clausewitz at the nexus of competing fashions in Western strategic thought

Pages 787-808 | Received 23 Oct 2022, Accepted 29 May 2023, Published online: 13 Jun 2023

Bibliography

  • Abrahamson, Eric and Piazza Alessandro, ’The Lifecycle of Management Ideas: Innovation, Diffusion, Institutionalization, Dormancy, and Rebirth’, in Andrew Sturdy, Stefan Heusinkveld, Trish Reay, and David Strang (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas (Oxford: Oxford UP 2019), 42–67. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.7.
  • Aron, Raymond, ’The Evolution of Modern Strategic Thought’, in Alastair Buchan (ed.), Problems of Modern Strategy: Part One, Adelphi Paper 54 (London: IISS 1969), 1–17.
  • Baldwin, David A., ’Security Studies and the End of the Cold War’, World Politics 48/1 (Oct. 1995), 117–41. doi:10.1353/wp.1995.0001.
  • Bassford, Christopher, Clausewitz in English: The Reception of Clausewitz in Britain and America (New York: Oxford UP 1994).
  • Beadon, R. H., ’Some Strategic Theories of Captain Liddell Hart’, The RUSI Journal 81/524 (1936), 747–60. doi:10.1080/03071843609422758.
  • Bikchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch, ’A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades’, Journal of Political Economy 100/5 (1992), 992–1026. doi:10.1086/261849.
  • Brodie, Bernard, ’Strategy Hits a Dead End’, Harper’s Magazine CCXI/1265 (1955), 33–37.
  • Brodie, Bernard, ’Why Were We so (Strategically) Wrong?’, Foreign Policy 5 ( Winter 1971-1972), 151–61. doi:10.2307/1147725.
  • de Jomini, Baron, The Art of War G.H. Mendell and W.P. Craighill, trans. (Westport: Greenwood Press 1862).
  • Drezner, Daniel W., ’Does Obama Have a Grand Strategy? Why We Need Doctrines in Uncertain Times’, Foreign Affairs 90/4 (July/Aug. 2011), 57–68.
  • Echevarria, Antulio J., II, ’Jomini, Modern War, and Strategy: The Triumph of the Essential’, in Hal Brands (ed.), The New Makers of Modern Strategy: From the Ancient World to the Digital Age (Princeton: Princeton UP 2023), 145–68. doi:10.2307/j.ctv3142v29.11.
  • Epstein, Robert M., Napoleon’s Last Victory and the Emergence of Modern War (Lawrence: UP of Kentucky 1994).
  • Freedman, Lawrence, ’Has Strategy Reached a Dead-End?’ Futures 11/2 (Apr. 1979), 122–31. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(79)90033-8.
  • Fuller, J. F. C., The Foundations of the Science of War (London: Hutchinson & Co 1926).
  • Gat, Azar., A History of Military Thought (Oxford: Oxford UP 2001).
  • Gough, Barry M., ’Maritime Strategy: The Legacies of Mahan and Corbett as Philosophers of Sea Power’, The RUSI Journal 133/4 ( Winter 1988), 55–62. doi:10.1080/03071848808445330.
  • Gray, Colin S., ’With Clausewitz to Eternity’, Historically Speaking 7/3 (Jan./Feb. 2006), 35–38. doi:10.1353/hsp.2006.0090.
  • Hosler, John D., ’Reframing the Conversation on Medieval Military Strategy’, Journal of Medieval Military History 16 (2018), 189–205.
  • Hughes, R. Gerald, ’Carl von Clausewitz and His Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831-2021’, History 105/368 (Dec. 2020), 773–805. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.13085.
  • ’Hybrid War – Hybrid Response?’ NATO Review, 1 July 2014, https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2014/07/01/hybrid-war-hybrid-response/index.html, accessed 27 Oct. 2021.
  • Jonsson, Oscar, The Russian Understanding of War: Blurring the Lines Between War and Peace (Washington DC: Georgetown UP 2019). doi:10.2307/j.ctvr697c8.
  • Kaldor, Mary, New & Old Wars (Cambridge: Polity 2006).
  • Keegan, John, A History of Warfare (New York: Vintage Books 1994).
  • Kim, Eundeok, Anne Marie Fiore, and Hyejeong Kim, Fashion Trends: Analysis and Forecasting (London: Berg 2011).
  • Kornberger, Martin and Anders Engberg-Pedersen, ’Reading Clausewitz, Reimagining the Practice of Strategy’, Strategic Organization 19/2 (May 2021), 338–50. doi:10.1177/1476127019854963.
  • Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962).
  • Lambert, Andrew, ’Review of The Transformation of War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 15/1 (1992), 128–31. doi:10.1080/01402399208437476.
  • Liddell Hart, Basil, The Ghost of Napoleon (London: Faber 1933).
  • Machiavelli, Niccolò and C. Lynch, Art of War Christopher Lynch, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2003). doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226500324.001.0001.
  • Meilinger, Phillip S., ’Busting the Icon: Restoring Balance to the Influence of Clausewitz’, Strategic Studies Quarterly 1/1 ( Fall 2007), 116–45.
  • Milevski, Lukas, ’The Mirage of Post-Clausewitzianism: Understanding War and Politics on the Frontier of Clausewitzian Thought’, Military Strategy Special Issue The Continuing Relevance of Clausewitz (Dec. 2020), 16–20.
  • Neill, Donald A., ’Ancestral Voices: The Influence of the Ancients on the Military Thought of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, The Journal of Military History 62/3 (July 1998), 487–520. doi:10.2307/120435.
  • Paret, Peter, Clausewitz and the State (Princeton: Princeton UP 1976).
  • Pichichero, Christy, The Military Enlightenment: War and Culture in the French Empire from Louis XIV to Napoleon (Ithaca: Cornell UP 2017). doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501709296.001.0001.
  • Rapoport, Anatol, ’Introduction’, in Carl von Clausewitz (ed.), On War Anatol Rapoport, ed. (Baltimore: Penguin Books 1968), 11–80.
  • ’Review of The Decisive Wars of History: A Study in Strategy’, The RUSI Journal 74/496 (1929), 894–95.
  • Review of The Ghost of Napoleon’, The RUSI Journal 78/512 (1933), 875–76.
  • Scheipers, Sibylle, On Small War: Carl von Clausewitz and People’s War (Oxford: Oxford UP 2018). doi:10.1093/oso/9780198799047.001.0001.
  • Schelling, Thomas, ’Bargaining, Communication, and Limited War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 1/1 (Mar. 1957), 19–36. doi:10.1177/002200275700100104.
  • Sproles, George B., ’Analyzing Fashion Lifecycles—Principles and Perspectives’, Journal of Marketing 45/4 ( Fall 1981), 116–24. doi:10.1177/002224298104500415.
  • Strachan, Hew, ’A Clausewitz for Every Season’, The American Interest 2/6 (July 2007). http://www.the-american-interest.com/2007/07/01/a-clausewitz-for-every-season/
  • Strachan, Hew, ’Clausewitz and the First World War’, Journal of Military History 75/2 (Apr. 2011), 367–91.
  • Strachan, Hew, ’The Elusive Meaning and Enduring Relevance of Clausewitz’, in Hal Brands (ed.), The New Makers of Modern Strategy: From the Ancient World to the Digital Age (Princeton: Princeton UP 2023), 116–44. doi:10.2307/j.ctv3142v29.10.
  • Strawson, John, ’Review of The Transformation of War’, The RUSI Journal 136/3 (1991), 76–77.
  • Summers, Harry G., Jr, On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War (New York: Dell 1984).
  • van Creveld, Martin, ’The Eternal Clausewitz’, in Michael I. Handel (ed.), Clausewitz and Modern Strategy (London: Frank Cass 1986), 35–50.
  • van Creveld, Martin, The Transformation of War (New York: The Free Press 1991).
  • Van Creveld, Martin, Clio and Me: An Intellectual Autobiography (Tampere: Castalia House 2016).
  • Villacres, Edward J. and Christopher Bassford, ’Reclaiming the Clausewitzian Trinity’, Parameters 25/3 ( Autumn 1995), 9–19. doi:10.55540/0031-1723.1730.
  • von Clausewitz, Carl, Napoleon’s 1796 Italian Campaign Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle, trans. (Lawrence: UP of Kansas 2018). doi:10.2307/j.ctv7n0bww.
  • Waldman, Thomas, War, Clausewitz, and the Trinity (Farnham: Ashgate 2013).
  • Widen, J. J., ’Sir Julian Corbett and the Theoretical Study of War’, Journal of Strategic Studies 30/1 (Feb. 2007), 109–27. doi:10.1080/01402390701272533.
  • Yüksel, Engin, ‘The Continuity and Discontinuity of Fundamental Military Concepts in Russian Military Thought Between 1856 and 2010’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Leiden University, 2023.
  • Zilincik, Samuel, ’Technology is Awesome, but so What?! Exploring the Relevance of Technologically Inspired Awe to the Construction of Military Theories’, Journal of Strategic Studies 45/1 (2022), 5–32. doi:10.1080/01402390.2021.1923919.