Introduction to the special issue

Bibliography

• Abrahamson, Eric and Alessandro Piazza, ’The Lifecycle of Management Ideas: Innovation, Diffusion, Institutionalization, Dormancy, and Rebirth’, in Andrew Sturdy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas (Oxford, UK: Oxford UP 2019), 42–67. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.7.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, Raymond, ’The Evolution of Modern Strategic Thought’, in Alastair Buchan (ed.), Problems of Modern Strategy: Part One, Adelphi Paper 54 (London: IISS 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, Patrik and Frédéric Godart, ’Sociology of Fashion: Order and Change’, Annual Review of Sociology 39 (2013), 171–92. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, John and James J. Wirtz, ’Introduction: Strategy in the Contemporary World: Strategy After 9/11’, in John Baylis, James J. Wirtz, and Colin S. Gray (eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 5th edition (Oxford UK: Oxford UP 2016), 1–14. doi:10.1093/hepl/9780198708919.003.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Benders, Jos and Kees van Veen, ’What’s in a Fashion? Interpretative Viability and Management Fashions,’ Organization 8/1 (2001), 33–53. doi:10.1177/135050840181003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Joel, Flavor of the Month: Why Smart People Fall for Fads (Berkeley et al.: University of California Press 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert, ’Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection,’ The Sociological Quarterly 10/3 (1969), 275–91. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1969.tb01292.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen, The Evolution of International Security Studies (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP 2009). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817762.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, Isabelle and James E. Worrall, ’Global Strategic Studies: A Manifesto,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 40/3 (2017), 347–57. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1269228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, Isabelle and Jeffrey H. Michaels, ’Revitalizing Strategic Studies in an Age of Perpetual Conflict,’ Orbis 60/1 (2016), 22–35. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2015.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence and Jeffrey H. Michaels, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy: New, Updated and Completely Revised (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2019). doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57350-6.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence, The Transformation of Strategic Affairs, Adelphi Paper 370 (London: IISS 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Futter, Andrew, ’“Cyber” Semantics: Why We Should Retire the Latest Buzzword in Security Studies,’ Journal of Cyber Policy 3/2 (2018), 201–16. doi:10.1080/23738871.2018.1514417.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Karl Erik and Ole Jørgen Maaø (eds.), Conceptualizing Modern War (London, UK: Hurst 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Libiseller, Chiara, Reconceptualising War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies, unpublished PhD thesis (King’s College London, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, Thomas G., ’The Future of Strategic Studies,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 26/1 (2003), x–xviii. doi:10.1080/01402390308559305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Steven E., ’International Security at Twenty-Five: From One World to Another,’ International Security 26/1 (2001), 5–39. doi:10.1162/016228801753212840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S., Jr. and Sean M. Lynn-Jones, ’International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field,’ International Security 12/4 (1988), 5–27. doi:10.2307/2538992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redford, Kent H., Christine Padoch, and Terry Sunderland, ’Fads, Funding, and Forgetting in Three Decades of Conservation,’ Conservation Biology 27/3 (2013), 437–8. doi:10.1111/cobi.12071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, Bettina and Hanna Smith, ’PART 1: “Hybrid warfare” as an Operational Approach to War: A New War-Winning Formula?’, in ibid. (eds.), Russia and Hybrid Warfare: Going Beyond the Label, Aleksanteri Papers 1/2016, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Silove, Nina, ’Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of “Grand Strategy”’, Security Studies 27/1 (2018), 27–57. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1360073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg, ’Fashion’, American Journal of Sociology 62/6 (May 1957), 541–558. doi:10.1086/222102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. R., ’COIN and the Chameleon: The Category Errors of Trying to Divide the Indivisible’, in Celeste Ward Gventer, David Jones and M.L.R. Smith (eds.), The New Counter-Insurgency Era in Critical Perspective (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2014), 32–57. doi:10.1057/9781137336941_3.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R., ’Foreword: On Academic Fads and Fashions,’ Michigan Law Review 99/6 (2001), 1251–64. doi:10.2307/1290382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, Lars, Fashion: A Philosophy, Transl. by John Irons (London: Reaktion Books 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole, ’The History and Social Structure of Security Studies as a Practico-Academic Field’, in Trine Villumsen Berling and Christian Bueger (eds.), Security Expertise: Practice, Power, Responsibility (London, New York: Routledge 2015), 76–106.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., ’The Renaissance of Security Studies,’ International Studies Quarterly 35/2 (1991), 211–239. doi:10.2307/2600471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar