Representation and safe space: conflicting discourses in RE teacher education supervision

References

• Alberts, W. 2010. “The Academic Study of Religions and Integrative Religious Education in Europe.” British Journal of Religious Education 32 (3): 275–290. doi:10.1080/01416200.2010.498621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, J. 2013. “Swedish Religion Education: Objective but Marinated in Lutheran Protestantism?” Temenos. Finland, Europe: Temenos; Temenos. http://webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.fttsvojs.oai.ojs.pkp.sfu.ca.article.9545&site=eds-live.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, D. 2016. Vad Är Religionslärarkunskap? : En Diskursanalys Av Trepartssamtal i Lärarutbildningen. Göteborg: Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Cartaut, S., and S. Bertone. 2009. “Co-Analysis of Work in the Triadic Supervision of Preservice Teachers Based on Neo-Vygotskian Activity Theory: Case Study from a French University Institute of Teacher Training.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (8): 1086–1094. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erricker, C. 2001. “Shall We Dance? Authority, Representation, and Voice: The Place of Spirituality in Religious Education.” Religious Education 96: 20–35. http://webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000168162900002&site=eds-live
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everington, J. 2016. “’Being Professional’: RE Teachers’ Understandings of Professionalism 1997–2014.” British Journal of Religious Education 38 (2): 177–188. doi:10.1080/01416200.2016.1139892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everington, J., I. Ter Avest, C. Bakker, and A. van der Want. 2011. “European Religious Education Teachers’ Perceptions of and Responses to Classroom Diversity and Their Relationship to Personal and Professional Biographies.” British Journal of Religious Education 33 (2): 241–256. doi:10.1080/01416200.2011.546669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. L. 1985. “Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (6): 739–763. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. 2 ed. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis : The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis [Elektronisk Resurs], edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 121–138. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse : Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., and R. Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by T. A. van Dijk, 258–284. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmitt, M. 2000. “Constructivist Pedagogies of Religious Education Project: Re-Thinking Knowledge, Teaching and Learning in Religious Education.” In Pedagogies of Religious Education : Case Studies in the Research and Development of Good Pedagogic Practice in RE, edited by M. Grimmitt, 207–227. Great Wakering: McCrimmons.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Z., and S. D. Rutland. 2016. “Creating a Safe Place: SRE Teaching as an Act of Security and Identity Formation in Government Schools in Australia.” British Journal of Religious Education 38 (1): 30–46. doi:10.1080/01416200.2015.1025699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvarson Britton, T. 2014. Studiebesök i Religionskunskapsundervisningen [Elektronisk Resurs] : Elevers Tal Om Islam Före, under Och Efter Ett Moskébesök. Karlstad: Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap, Pedagogiskt arbete, Karlstads universitet. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-34495.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist Lidh, C. 2016. Representera Och Bli Representerad [Elektronisk Resurs] Elever Med Religiös Positionering Talar Om Skolans Religionskunskapsundervisning. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-46886.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 1997. Religious Education : An Interpretive Approach. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2004. Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality : Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2014. Signposts - Policy and Practice for Teaching about Religions and Non-Religious World Views in Intercultural Education [Elektronisk Resurs]. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kittelmann Flensner, K. 2015. Religious Education in Contemporary Pluralistic Sweden. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-8740.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Den Kvalitativa Forskningsintervjun. 2. uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur. http://www.studentlitteratur.se/omslagsbild/artnr/3314-02/height/320/width/320/bild.jpg.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony & Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lied, S. 2011. “The Dialogical RE Classroom - A Safe Forum and A Risky Business. A Response to Robert Jackson´S Presentation of the Interpretive Approach.” In Patterns of Research in Civics, History, Geography and Religious Education : Key Presentations and Responses from an International Conference at Karlstad University, Sweden, edited by B. Schüllerqvist, 165–174. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press, Karlstad University Library.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. J., and M. D. Byrd. 1997. “Supervision in Teacher Education.” In Handbook of Research on School Supervision, edited by G. R. Firth and E. F. Pajak, 409–427. New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2001. “Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis [Elektronisk Resurs], edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 14–31. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mtika, P., D. Robson, and R. Fitzpatrick. 2014. “Joint Observation of Student Teaching and Related Tripartite Dialogue during Field Experience: Partner Perspectives.” Teaching and Teacher Education 39: 66–76. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, E. 2004. Intercultural Education : Ethnographic and Religious Approaches. Brighton; Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osbeck, C., K. Sporre, and G. Skeie. 2017. “The RE Classroom as a Safe Public Space - Critical Perspectives on Dialogue, Demands for Respect, and Nuanced Religious Education.” In Location, Space and Place in Religious Education, edited by M. Rothgangel, K. von Brömssen, H.-G. Heimbrock, and G. Skeie, 49–66. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., and B. Davidson. 2011. Forskningsmetodikens Grunder : Att Planera, Genomföra Och Rapportera En Undersökning. 4., Uppda. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, A., and V. L. Keil. 2007. “Restructuring a Traditional Student Teacher Supervision Model: Fostering Enhanced Professional Development and Mentoring within a Professional Development School Context.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymarz, R. M. 2007. “Who Is This Person Grace? A Reflection on Content Knowledge in Religious Education.” Religious Education 102 (1): 62–74. doi:10.1080/00344080601117697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeie, G. 2002. “The Concept of Plurality and Its Meaning for Religious Education.” British Journal of Religious Education 25 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1080/0141620020250105.
   Google Scholar
• Skeie, G. 2009. “A Community of Dialogue and Conflict.” In Religious Education Research through a Community of Practice : Action Research and the Interpretive Approach, edited by J. Ipgrave, R. Jackson, and K. O’Grady, 216–234. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Slick, S. K. 1997. “Assessing versus Assisting: The Supervisor’s Roles in the Complex Dynamics of the Student Teaching Triad.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (7): 713–726. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00016-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubani, M. 2012. “What Characterises the Competent RE Teacher? Finnish Student Teachers’ Perceptions at the Beginning of Their Pedagogical Training.” British Journal of Religious Education 34 (1): 35–50. doi:10.1080/01416200.2011.601906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2004. Religion, Education, and Post-Modernity. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar