REFERENCES
- Atiyah, P. (1967) Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts, London: Butterworths.
- Besner, R. (1999) Institutional Child Abuse in Canada, Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada.
- Coase, R. (1960) The problem of social cost', Journal of Law and Economics III: 1.
- Dingwall, R. (1986) 'Reports of committees: the Jasmine Beckford affair', Modem Law Review 49(4): 489.
- Feldthusen, B. (1998) 'Vicarious liability for sexual torts', in N. Mullany and A. Linden (eds) Torts Tomorrow: A Tribute to John Fleming, Sydney, NSW: LBC Information Services.
- Hall, M. (1998) 'A ministry for children: abandoning the interventionist debate in British Columbia', International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 12: 121.
- Salmond and Heuston on the Law of Torts (1981) 18th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Rubin Weber, R. '"Scope of employment" redefined: holding employers vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by their employees', Minnesota Law Review 76: 1513.
- Sykes, A. (1988) The boundaries of vicarious liability: an economic analysis of the scope of the employment rule and related legal doctrines', Harvard Law Review 101: 563.
- Turner, B. and Pidgeon, N. (1997) Man-Made Disasters, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Utting, W. (1997) People Like Us: Summary Report of the Review of Safeguards for Children Living Away From Home, London: Department of Health.
- Vaughn, D. (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.