Norm contestation and reconciliation: evidence from a regional transitional justice process in the Balkans

References

• Baker, C., and J. Obradovic-Wochnik. 2016. “Mapping the Nexus of Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 281–301. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2016.1199483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, J., A. Weale, and A. Bicquelet. 2007. “Analysing Parliamentary Debate with Computer Assistance.” Swiss Political Science Review 13 (4): 577–605. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicquelet, A., A. Weale, and J. Bara. 2012. “In a Different Parliamentary Voice?” Politics & Gender 8 (1): 83–121. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, C. 2007. “‘Dalit Rights Are Human Rights’: Caste Discrimination, International Activism, and the Construction of a New Human Rights Issue.” Human Rights Quarterly 29 (1): 167–193. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2007.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacker, T., and S. Buckley-Zistel. 2013. “Introduction: Transitions from Violence – Analyzing the Effects of Transitional Justice.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence 7 (1): 4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. 1993. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104: 97–113. doi: 10.1086/293577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugidou, M. 2003. “Argumentation and Values: An Analysis of Ordinary Political Competence via an Open-ended Question.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15 (4): 413–430. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/15.4.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. C. 2007. “Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 99–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. C. 2011. “Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms.” International Organization 65 (1): 69–102. doi: 10.1017/S0020818310000329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. R. 2009. “Approaches to Studying Reconciliation.” In Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research, edited by Hugo van der Merwe, Victoria Baxter, and Audrey R. Chapman, 143–172. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., and L. Zimmermann. 2013. Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms. Peace Research Institute and Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. PRIF Working Papers 18.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lellio, A., and C. McCurn. 2013. “Engineering Grassroots Transitional Justice in the Balkans: The Case of Kosovo.” East European Politics and Societies 27 (1): 129–148. doi: 10.1177/0888325412464550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and J. Goodwin. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1411–1454. doi: 10.1086/230450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52: 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordy, E. 2013. Guilt, Responsibility and Denial: The Past at Stake in Post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. A., and P. C. McMahon. 2013. “From International Courts to Grassroots Organizing: Obstacles to Transitional Justice in the Balkans.” In Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans, edited by O. Simić and Z. Volčič, 217–237. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Istorijat inicijative o osnivanju REKOM-a. 2009. Koalicija za REKOM. Public release, March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovčić, E. 2009. Konsultacije sa lokalnom zajednicom o inicijativi REKOM Brčko, Bosna i Herzegovina. December 5.
   Google Scholar
• Jasso, G., and K.-D. Opp. 1997. “Probing the Character of Norms: A Factorial Survey Analysis of the Norms of Political Action.” American Sociological Review 62 (6): 947–964. doi: 10.2307/2657349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. 2009. “Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance.” In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, edited by M. Kahler, 1–20. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandić, N. 2007. “Transitional Justice in the Post-conflict Societies in Former Yugoslavia.” Sudosteruopa Mitteilungen 4 (1): 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komesaroff, P. A. 2008. “Pathways to Reconciliation: Bringing Diverse Voices into Conversation.” In Pathways to Reconciliation: Between Theory and Practise, edited by P. Rothfield, 1–12. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kostić, R. 2008. “Nationbuilding as an Instrument of Peace? Exploring Local Attitudes Towards International Nationbuilding and Reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Civil Wars 10 (4): 384–412. doi: 10.1080/13698240802354482
   Google Scholar
• Kostovicova, D. 2010. “Civil Society in the Western Balkans: Vehicle for or Obstacle to Transitional Justice.” In Conflict and Memory: Bridging Past and Future in SouthEast Europe, edited by W. Petritsch and V. Džihić, 287–293. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Kostovicova, D. 2013. “Airing Crimes, Marginalizing Victims: Political Expectations and Transitional Justice in Kosovo.” In The Milošević Trial: An Autopsy, edited by T. W. Waters, 249–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kostovicova, D. 2017. “Seeking Justice in a Divided Region: Text Analysis of Regional Civil Society Deliberations in the Balkans.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 11 (1): 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, L. 2001. “Changing Forms of Coexistence.” In Reconciliation, Justice and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, edited by M. Abu-Nimer, 47–64. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kurze, A., and I. Vukusic. 2013. “Afraid to Cry Wolf: Human Rights Activists’ Struggle of Transnational Accountability Efforts in the Balkans.” In Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans, edited by O. Simić and Z. Volčič, 201–217. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., and W. H. Wong. 2009. “The Politics of Networks: Interests, Power, and Human Rights Norms.” In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, edited by M. Kahler, 127–150. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nettelfield, L. 2012. Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obradovic-Wochnik, J. 2013. “Serbian Civil Society as an Exclusionary Space: NGOs, the Public and ‘Coming to Terms with the Past’.” In Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans, edited by V. Bojicic-Dzelilovic, J. Ker-Lindsay, and D. Kostovicova, 210–229. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, I. 2017. “Pulling Together: Shared Intentions, Deliberative Democracy and Deeply Divided Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 187–202. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. 2006. “Purposive Sampling.” In The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods, edited by V. Jupp, 244–245. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Orentlicher, D. F. 2007. “‘Settling Accounts’ Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms with Local Agency.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 10–22. doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijm010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Jr., L. J., and K. J. Meier. 2006. “Networking in the Penumbra: Public Management, Cooptative Links, and Distributional Consequences.” International Public Management Journal 9(3): 271–294. doi: 10.1080/10967490600899580
   Google Scholar
• Pankhurst, D. 1999. “Issues of Justice and Reconciliation in Complex Political Emergencies: Conceptualising Reconciliation, Justice and Peace.” Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 239–255. doi: 10.1080/01436599914027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M., and K. L. Page. 1998. “Network Forms of Organization.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 57–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., and R. A. Berk. 1985. “Varieties of Normative Consensus.” American Sociological Review 50 (5): 333–347. doi: 10.2307/2095543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowen, J. 2012. “Mobilizing Truth: Agenda Setting in a Transnational Social Movement.” Law & Social Inquiry 37 (3): 686–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 2005. “Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry’s National Security Speeches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (3): 701–711.
   Google Scholar
• Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 2008. “The Congressional Debate on Partial-birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 383–410. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 2013. Deliberating American Monetary Policy: A Textual Analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, D. N. 2013. “Interrogating the Peripheries: The Preoccupations of Fourth Generation Transitional Justice.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 26: 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. 2009. “The Power of Networks in International Politics.” In Networked Politics: Agency, Power and Governance, edited by M. Kahler, 228–247. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolić, I. 2016. “Researching Norms, Narratives and Transitional Justice: Focus Group Methodology in Post-Conflict Croatia.” Nationalities Papers 44 (6): 932–949. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2016.1183605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teitel, R. G. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Touquet, H., and P. Vermeersch. 2016. “Changing Frames of Reconciliation: The Politics of Peace-building in the Former Yugoslavia.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (1): 55–73. doi: 10.1177/0888325415584048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallès, D. W. 2014. “The Contours of Political Discourse: Deliberating the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act.” PhD diss. London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• van Raaij, D. P. A. M. 2006. “Norms Network Members Use: An Alternative Perspective for Indicating Network Success or Failure.” International Public Management Journal 9 (3): 249–270. doi: 10.1080/10967490600899549
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. 2004. “The ‘New’ Science of Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 243–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale, A., A. Bicquelet, and J. Bara. 2012. “Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy.” Political Studies 60: 643–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2017. “A Theory of Contestation – A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts.” Polity 49 (1): 109–125. doi: 10.1086/690100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalaquett, J. 1991–1992. “Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemma of New Democracies Confronting Past Human Rights Violations.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1425–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar