A prospect of staying? Differentiated access to integration for asylum seekers in Germany

References

• Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.” Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65. doi: 10.1177/0090591707310090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abizadeh, Arash. 2016. “The Special-Obligations Challenge to More Open Borders.” In Migration in Political Theory. The Ethics of Movement and Membership, edited by Sarah Fine, and Lea Ypi, 105–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, Veit. 2005. “The Ethics of Immigration.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 12 (3): 331–361.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, Veit. 2012. “Moral, Ethical, and Realist Dilemmas of Transnational Governance of Migration.” American Behavioral Scientist 20 (10): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, Étienne. 2004. We, the People of Europe: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF. 2017. Asylgeschäftsstatistik Für Den Monat Dezember 2016. Nürnberg. Accessed 4 July 2019. https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Downloads/Infothek/Statistik/Asyl/201612-statistik-anlage-asyl-geschaeftsbericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF. 2018. Asylgeschäftsbericht Für Den Monat Dezember 2017. Nürnberg. Accessed 4 July 2019. https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Downloads/Infothek/Statistik/Asyl/201712-statistik-anlage-asyl-geschaeftsbericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Michael. 2006. “Universal and Qualified Rights to Immigration.” Ethics and Economics 4 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• BMAS. 2017. Ein Leitfaden Zu Arbeitsmarktzugang Und -Förderung Flüchtlinge. Kundinnen Und Kunden Der Arbeitsagenturen Und JobCenter, Stand April 2017. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.
   Google Scholar
• BMI. 2015. “Änderung Und Beschleunigung von Asylverfahren Beschlossen, Nachricht 29.09.2015.” Accessed 7 December 2016. http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/DE/2015/09/kabinett-beschliesst-asylverfahrensbeschleunigungsgesetz.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bosniak, Linda. 2007. “Being Here: Ethical Territoriality and the Rights of Immigrants.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2): 389–410. doi: 10.2202/1565-3404.1155
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgmehr, Kayvan, and Oliver Razum. 2015. “Effect of Restricting Access to Health Care on Health Expenditures among Asylum-Seekers and Refugees: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Germany, 1994–2013.” Plos One 10: e0131483. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brücker, Herbert. 2016. “Integrationsgesetz: Das Vertrauen in Den Markt Fehlt.” Wirtschaftsdienst (Hamburg, Germany) 96 (6): 380–382. doi: 10.1007/s10273-016-1987-z
   Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” The Review of Politics 49 (2): 251–273. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500033817
   Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 1996. “Realistic and Idealistic Approaches to the Ethics of Migration.” International Migration Review 30 (1): 156–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 2005. “On Belonging. What we Owe People Who Stay.” Boston Review 30 (3–4): 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph H. 2010. Immigrants and the Right to Stay. Boston: Boston Review Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Philip. 2000. Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Haas, Hein, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli. 2018. “Growing Restrictiveness or Changing Selection? The Nature and Evolution of Migration Policies.” International Migration Review 52 (2): 324–367. doi: 10.1111/imre.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1973. “The Original Position.” The University of Chicago Law Review 40 (3): 500–533. doi: 10.2307/1599246
   Google Scholar
• ECRE. 2016. The Length of Asylum Procedures in Europe, Asylum Information Database, October 2016. Brussels: Asylum Information Database (AIDA).
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, Antje. 2009. States Against Migrants - Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, Antje. 2014. “The Rule of Law and the Right to Stay: The Moral Claims of Undocumented Migrants.” Politics & Society 42 (3): 293–308. doi: 10.1177/0032329214543255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellermann, Antje, and Agustin Goenaga. 2019. “Discrimination and Policies of Immigrant Selection in Liberal States.” Politics & Society 47 (1): 87–116. doi: 10.1177/0032329218820870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, Claudia. 2014. “Convergence Against the Odds - the Development of Safe Country of Origin Policies in EU Member States (1990–2013).” European Journal of Migration and Law 16 (2): 277–302. doi: 10.1163/15718166-12342056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias. 2014. Inside Immigration Law. Migration Management and Policy Application in Germany. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “Persons Subject of Asylum Applications Pending at the End of the Month by Citizenship, Age and Sex Monthly Data (Rounded).” Accessed 15 June 2018. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_asypenctzm&lang=de.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, David S., David Cook-Martín, Angela S. García, and Rawan Arar. 2018. “Can You Become One of us? A Historical Comparison of Legal Selection of ‘Assimilable’ Immigrants in Europe and the Americas.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1): 27–47. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1313106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas. 2014. “International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy: The Case of Deterrence Policies.” Journal of Refugee Studies 27 (4): 574–595. doi: 10.1093/jrs/feu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, Matthew J. 2008. “Asylum and the Expansion of Deportation in the United Kingdom.” Government and Opposition 43 (2): 146–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, Matthew J. 2009. Precarious Residents: Migration Control, Membership and the Rights of Non-Citizens, UNDP Human Development Reports Research Paper 2009/2010. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, Matthew J. 2016. “Political Theory, Ethics, and Forced Migration.” In The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, edited by Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, Gil Loescher, Katy Long, and Nando Sigona, 48–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, Dominik Hangartner, and Duncan Lawrence. 2016. “When Lives are Put on Hold: Lengthy Asylum Processes Decrease Employment among Refugees.” Science Advances 2 (8): 1–7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire, James. 2013. The Politics of Immigration. Contradictions of the Liberal State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, Liv Bjerre, Friederike Römer, and Malisa Zobel. 2017. “Measuring Immigration Policies: The IMPIC Database.” European Political Science 16 (1): 79–98. doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Samantha, and Harald Bauder. 2014. “Neither Temporary, nor Permanent: The Precarious Employment Experiences of Refugee Claimants in Canada.” Journal of Refugee Studies 27 (3): 360–381. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fet048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2005. “Exclusion in the Liberal State: The Case of Immigration and Citizenship Policy.” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (1): 43–61. doi: 10.1177/1368431005049327
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2007. “Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe.” West European Politics 30 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehner, Roman. 2016. “Gehen Oder Bleiben? Der Gesetzgeber Kann Sich Nicht Entscheiden, 6. Juni 2016.” Verfassungsblog. Accessed 7 December 2016. http://verfassungsblog.de/gehen-oder-bleiben-der-gesetzgeber-kann-sich-nicht-entscheiden/.
   Google Scholar
• Marbach, Moritz, Jens Hainmueller, and Dominik Hangartner. 2018. “The Long-term Impact of Employment Bans on the Economic Integration of Refugees.” Science Advances 4: 1–7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2012. “Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders.” Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4/5): 58–75. doi: 10.1177/0263276412443569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 2009. “Justice and Boundaries.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 8 (3): 291–309. doi: 10.1177/1470594X09105390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, David. 2003. “On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 18 (1): 13–25. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598
   Google Scholar
• Nußberger, Angelika. 2016. “Flüchtlingsschicksale Zwischen Völkerrecht Und Politik: Zur Rechtsprechung Des EGMR Zu Fragen Der Staatenverantwortung in Migrationsfällen.” Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 35 (12): 815–822.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Aihwa. 2006. “Mutations in Citizenship.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (3): 499–505. doi: 10.1177/0263276406064831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernice, Regina, and Judith Brook. 1996. “Refugees’ and Immigrants’ Mental Health: Association of Demographic and Post-Immigration Factors.” Journal of Social Psychology 136 (4): 511–519. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, Thomas. 2005. “World Poverty and Human Rights.” Ethics & International Affairs 19 (1): 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00484.x
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and Carla Küffner. 2016. “After the Deportation Gap: Non-Removed Persons and their Pathways to Social Rights.” In Migration and Integration: New Models for Mobility and Coexistence, edited by Roland Hsu, and Christoph Reinprecht, 137–150. Vienna: Vienna University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schammann, Hannes. 2017. “Eine Meritokratische Wende? Arbeit Und Leistung Als Neue Strukturprinzipien Der Deutschen Flüchtlingspolitik.” Sozialer Fortschritt 66: 741–757. doi: 10.3790/sfo.66.11.741
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, Ayelet. 2014. “Introduction: Citizenship and the ‘Right to Have Rights’.” Citizenship Studies 18 (2): 114–124. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2014.886389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachar, Ayelet, and Ran Hirschl. 2014. “On Citizenship, States, and Markets.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2): 231–257. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigona, Nando. 2018. “The Contested Politics of Naming in Europe’s ‘Refugee Crisis’.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (3): 456–460. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1388423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnerbrink, Ingrid, Annette Field, Zachary Steel, and Vijaya Manicavasagar. 1997. “Compounding of Premigration Trauma and Postmigration Stress in Asylum Seekers.” Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 131 (5): 463–470. doi: 10.1080/00223989709603533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Sarah. 2016. “The Significance of Territorial Presence and the Rights of Immigrants.” In Migration in Political Theory. The Ethics of Movement and Membership, edited by Sarah Fine, and Lea Ypi, 225–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thränhardt, Dietrich. 2015. Warum Das Deutsche Asylsystem Zu Einem Bearbeitungsstau Führt, Gutachten Im Auftrag Des Mediendienst Integration. Berlin: Mediendienst Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Thym, Daniel. 2016. “Integration Kraft Gesetzes? Grenzen Und Inhalte Des ‘Integrationsgesetzes’ Des Bundes.” ZAR 36 (8): 241–273.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, Claudius. 2016. Bleibeperspektive - Kritik Einer Begrifflichen Seifenblase. Münster: Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft zur Unterstützung Asylsuchender e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Shelley. 2009. “The Open Borders Debate on Immigration.” Philosophy Compass 4 (5): 813–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00230.x
   Google Scholar
• Will, Anne-Kathrin. 2018. “On ‘Genuine’ and ‘Illegitimate’ Refugees: New Boundaries Drawn by Discriminatory Legislation and Practice in the Field of Humanitarian Reception in Germany.” Social Inclusion 6 (3): 172–189.
   Google Scholar