Workforce diversity policies in practice: drivers and barriers in local administrations

References

• Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin. 2010. Gesetz zur Regelung von Partizipation und Integration in Berlin. Berlin: Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Michael. 2007. Cities and Labour Immigration. Comparing Policy Responses in Amsterdam, Paris, Rome and Tel Aviv. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. 2014. Bildung in Deutschland 2014. Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zur Bildung von Menschen mit Behinderungen. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina. 2018. Manufacturing Political Trust. Targets and Performance Management in Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, Eva, and Stefan Jonsson. 2008. “Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin, 78–98. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• BQN Berlin. 2014. “Entwicklung des Anteils neuer Auszubildender mit Migrationshintergrund im Öffentlichen Dienst Berlins 2006–2013. Berlin: BQN.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, Patricia, and Walter W. Powell. 2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World.” The Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 483–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils. 2006. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, Andrea D., and Karen Schönwälder. 2017. “Public Organisations and Diversity: Approaches to an Under-Researched Topic.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (10): 1635–1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, Alison, and Christy Glass. 2015. “The Power of One or Power in Numbers? Analyzing the Effect of Minority Leaders on Diversity Policy and Practice.” Work and Occupations 42 (2): 183–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creegan, Chris, Fiona Colgan, Richard Charlesworth, and Gil Robinson. 2003. “Race Equality Policies at Work: Employee Perceptions of the ‘Implementation Gap’ in a UK Local Authority.” Work, Employment and Society 17 (4): 617–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, David L., and Mark Suchman. 2008. “Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin, 49–77. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, Rianne, Henrik Emilsson, Bernhard Krieger, and Peter Scholten. 2015. “A Local Dimension of Integration Policies? A Comparative Study of Berlin, Malmö, and Rotterdam.” International Migration Review 3 (49): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Der Beauftragte des Senats von Berlin für Integration und Migration. 2005. Vielfalt fördern – Zusammenhalt stärken. Das Integrationskonzept für Berlin. Berlin: Der Beauftragte des Senats für Integration und Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Der Beauftragte des Senats von Berlin für Integration und Migration. 2007. Vielfalt Fördern – Zusammenhalt stärken. Das Berliner Integrationskonzept. Berlin: Der Beauftragte des Senats für Integration und Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Die Bundesregierung. 2012. Nationaler Aktionsplan Integration. Zusammenhalt stärken – Teilhabe verwirklichen. Berlin: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin, Frank, Soohan Kim, and Alexandra Kalev. 2011. “You Can’t Always Get What You Need: Organizational Determinants of Diversity Programs.” American Sociological Review 76 (3): 386–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ette, Andreas, Susanne Stedtfeld, Harun Sulak, and Gunter Brückner. 2016. Erhebung des Anteils von Beschäftigten mit Migrationshintergrund in der Bundesverwaltung: Ergebnisbericht im Auftrag des Ressortarbeitskreises der Bundesregierung. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gesemann, Frank, and Roland Roth. 2009. “Kommunale Integrationspolitik in Deutschland - Einleitende Bemerkungen.” In Lokale Integrationspolitik in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft: Migration und Integration als Herausforderung von Kommunen, edited by Frank Gesemann and Roland Roth, 11–29. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gesemann, Frank, Roland Roth, and Jutta Aumüller. 2012. Stand der Kommunalen Integrationspolitik in Deutschland. Studie erstellt für das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung und die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, Sandra, and Stijn Verbeek. 2012. “Diversity Policies in Public and Private Sector Organizations: An Empirical Comparison of Incidence and Effectiveness.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 32 (4): 353–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 2006. “Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services.” Public Administration Review 66 (4): 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalev, Alexandra, Frank Dobbin, and Erin Kelly. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review 71 (4): 589–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl, Stefan. 2013. Organizations: A Systems Approach. Surrey: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Christine. 2019. Die Produktion von Diversität in Städtischen Verwaltungen. Wandel und Beharrung von Organisationen in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liff, Sonia, and Karen Dale. 1994. “Formal Opportunity, Informal Barriers: Black Women Managers Within a Local Authority.” Work, Employment and Society 8 (2): 177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1964. Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdt. Verl.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2003. “Organization.” In Autopoietic Organization Theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmanns Social Systems Perspective, edited by Tore Bakken and Tor Hernes, 31–52. Oslo: Abstrakt, Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ariño, Julia, Michalis Moutselos, Karen Schönwälder, Christian Jacobs, Maria Schiller, and Alexandre Tandé. 2019. “Why Do Some Cities Adopt More Diversity Policies Than Others? A Study in France and Germany.” Comparative European Politics 17 (5): 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meziani-Remichi, Yamina, and Marcel Maussen. 2017. “Recruitment in Public Administrations: Diversity Policies and Selection Practices in a French City.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (10): 1679–1695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher, Frederick C. 1982. Democracy and the Public Service. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naff, Katherine C., and J. Edward Kellough. 2003. “Ensuring Employment Equity: Are Federal Diversity Programs Making a Difference?” International Journal of Public Administration 26 (12): 1307–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Nassehi, Armin. 2005. “Organizations as Decision Machines: Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Organized Social Systems.” The Sociological Review 53 (1): 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, David W., Alisa K. Hicklin, Daniel P. Hawes, and Erin Melton. 2010. “What Drives the Implementation of Diversity Management Programs? Evidence From Public Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 867–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönwälder, Karen, and Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos. 2016. “The New Differentialism: Responses to Immigrant Diversity in Germany.” German Politics 25 (3): 366–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard, and W. Meyer John. 1991. “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 108–140. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, David. 2003. “Organisational Identity in Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems.” In Autopoietic Organization Theory. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Perspective, edited by Tore Bakken and Tor Hernes, 123–150. Oslo: Abstrakt, Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Solomos, John. 1989. “Equal Opportunities Policies and Racial Inequality: The Role of Public Policy.” Public Administration 67 (1): 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, Sarah. 2008. Equality and Diversity in Jobs and Services: City Policies for Migrants in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. 2018. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit: Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund - Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2017. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Accessed July 10 2019. https://www.destatis.de/Migration/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/MigrationIntegration/Migrationshintergrund.html.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet Corbin. 1996. Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie-Verlags-Union.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Ken. 1987. “The Space Between Words: Local Authorities and the Concept of Equal Opportunities.” In Racism and Equal Opportunity Policies in the 1980s, edited by Richard Jenkins and John Solomos, 93–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar