A cosmopolitan explanation of the integration paradox: a mixed methods approach

References

• Alba, R., and V. Nee. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review 31 (4): 826–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2010. “Searching for Belonging – An Analytical Framework.” Geography Compass 4 (6): 644–659.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2022. “The Diversity Continuum: Blurring the Boundaries Between Internal and External Others among Italian Children of Migrants.” Political Geography 96: 102602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basch, L., N. Glick Schiller, and C. Szanton Blanc. 1994. Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2003. “Toward a New Critical Theory with a Cosmopolitan Intent.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 10 (4): 453–468.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhuis, H., M. Lubbers, and M. Verkuyten. 2014. “How Education Moderates the Relation Between Globalization and Nationalist Attitudes.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26 (4): 487–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraus, T. 2018. “Migrant Protests as Acts of Cosmopolitan Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 22 (8): 791–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, S. 2002. “Migration and Community Formation Under Conditions of Globalization.” International Migration Review 36 (4): 1143–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, P., and B. Robbins. 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking And Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coenders, M., and P. Scheepers. 2003. “The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison.” Political Psychology 24 (2): 313–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C., and K. Van Kersbergen. 2007. “Interests, Identity and Political Allegiance in the European Union.” Acta Politica 42 (2/3): 307–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroome, T., B. Martinovic, and M. Verkuyten. 2014. “The Integration Paradox: Level of Education and Immigrants’ Attitudes Towards Natives and the Host Society.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 20 (2): 166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. 2011. The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eastmond, M. 2007. “Stories as Lived Experience: Narratives in Forced Migration Research.” Journal of Refugee Studies 20 (2): 248–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P. 2005. “Placing Identities: Transnational Practices and Local Attachments of Turkish Immigrants in Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 345–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, M. B., E. M. Doeland, and E. Tellander. 2018. “How Citizenship Matters (or Not): The Citizenship–Belonging Nexus Explored Among Residents in Oslo, Norway.” Citizenship Studies 22 (7): 705–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, M. B., and C. Oeppen. 2013. “Migrant Balancing Acts: Understanding the Interactions Between Integration and Transnationalism.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39 (6): 867–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts, N. 2022. “Puzzling Pathways: The Integration Paradox Among Migrants in Western Europe.” Doctoral diss., Radboud University Nijmegen. Radboud repository. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/246515.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, N., T. Davids, and N. Spierings. 2021. “The Lived Experience of an Integration Paradox: Why High-skilled Migrants from Turkey Experience Little National Belonging in the Netherlands.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (1): 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts, N., M. Lubbers, and N. Spierings. 2020. “Structural Position and Relative Deprivation Among Recent Migrants: A Longitudinal Take on the Integration Paradox.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (9): 1828–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorashi, H. 2003. “Multiple Identities Between Continuity and Change. The Narratives of Iranian Women in Exile.” Focaal - European Journal of Anthropology 42: 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakhverdian, A., E. Van Elsis, W. Van der Brug, and T. Kuhn. 2013. “Euroscepticism and Education: A Longitudinal Study of 12 EU Member States, 1973-2010.” European Union Politics 14 (4): 522–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. 1990. “Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture.” Theory, Culture & Society 7 (2): 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, M., and C. Teney. 2015. “The Cosmopolitan Elite in Germany: Transnationalism and Postmaterialism.” Global Networks 15 (4): 446–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2009. Belonging: A Culture of Place. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, C., and T. V. Olsen. 2021. “Transnational Citizens, Cosmopolitan Outlooks? Migration as a Route to Cosmopolitanism.” Nordic Journal of Migration Research 11 (1): 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 395–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. 2005. “Figures of the Cosmopolitan.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 18 (1): 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., T. Saresma, K. Hiltunen, S. Jäntti, N. Sääskilahti, A. Vallius, and K. Ahvenjärvi. 2016. “Fluidity and Flexibility of ‘Belonging’: Uses of the Concept in Contemporary Research.” Acta Sociologica 59 (3): 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajevardi, N., K. A. Oskooii, H. L. Walker, and A. L. Westfall. 2020. “The Paradox Between Integration and Perceived Discrimination among American Muslims.” Political Psychology 41 (3): 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarev, E., and K. Sharma. 2017. “Brother or Burden: An Experiment on Reducing Prejudice Toward Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (2): 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, P., and P. Nyíri. 2014. “Books, Bodies, and Bronzes: Comparing Sites of Global Citizenship Creation.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (12): 2149–2157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M., M. Gijsberts, F. Fleischmann, and M. Maliepaard. 2018. The New Immigrant Survey – The Netherlands (NIS2NL). The Codebook of a Four Wave Panel Study. NWO-Middengroot, file number 420-004.
   Google Scholar
• Molz, J. 2005. “Getting a “Flexible Eye”: Round-the-World Travel and Scales of Cosmopolitan Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 9 (5): 517–531.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelcu, M. 2012. “Migrants’ New Transnational Habitus: Rethinking Migration Through a Cosmopolitan Lens in the Digital Age.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (9): 1339–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2009. Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pichler, F. 2012. “Cosmopolitanism in a Global Perspective: An International Comparison of Open-Minded Orientations and Identity in Relation to Globalization.” International Sociology 27 (1): 21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F. 2005. “International Education and the Production of Cosmopolitan Identities.” In Globalization and Higher Education, edited by A. Arimoto, F. Huang, and K. Yokoyama, 77–92. Hiroshima: Hiroshmia University, Research Institute for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Röder, A. 2011. “Does Mobility Matter for Attitudes to Europe? A Multi-level Analysis of Immigrants’ Attitudes to European Unification.” Political Studies 59 (2): 458–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueth, S., and J. O’Loughlin. 2008. “Belonging to the World: Cosmopolitanism in Geographic Contexts.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 39 (2): 926–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şimşek, D. 2019. “Transnational Activities of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Hindering or Supporting Integration.” International Migration 57 (2): 268–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrbiš, Z., and I. Woodward. 2011. “Cosmopolitan Openness.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism, edited by M. Rovisco and M. Nowicka, 53–68. Famham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Snel, E., G. Engbersen, and A. Leerkes. 2006. “Transnational Involvement and Social Integration.” Global Networks 6 (3): 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, N. 2015. “Gender Equality Attitudes among Turks in Western Europe and Turkey: The Interrelated Impact of Migration and Parents’ Attitudes.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (5): 749–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmann, J. P. 2019. “The Paradox of Integration: Why Do Higher Educated New Immigrants Perceive More Discrimination in Germany?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (9): 1377–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Teije, I., M. Coenders, and M. Verkuyten. 2013. “The Paradox of Integration.” Social Psychology 44 (4): 278–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolsma, J., M. Lubbers, and M. Gijsberts. 2012. “Education and Cultural Integration among Ethnic Minorities and Natives in the Netherlands: A Test of the Integration Paradox.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (5): 793–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2012. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, M., P. Scheepers, and J. Dagevos. 2013. “Explaining the Integration Paradox among Small Immigrant Groups in the Netherlands.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 14 (2): 381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. 2016. “The Integration Paradox.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (5–6): 583–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S., and R. Cohen. 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., K. Kannabiran, and U. Vieten. 2006. The Situated Politics of Belonging. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar