Understanding the role of ideas in public administration: the cases of Canadian and UK immigration policy-making

References

• Bertossi, Christophe. 2011. “National Models of Integration in Europe: A Comparative and Critical Analysis.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (12): 1561–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, Mark, and Blyth Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina, and Elisabeth Badenhoop. 2021. “‘What isn’t in the Files, isn’t in the World’: Understanding State Ignorance of Irregular Migration in Germany and the United Kingdom.” Governance 34 (2): 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina, and James Hampshire. 2016. “Ideas and Agency in Immigration Policy: A Discursive Institutionalist Approach.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils. 2002. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt and Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS. Quid Pro Books.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Stephen. 2004. “The Factors that Make and Unmake Migration Policies.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 852–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius, W. A., P. L. Martin, and J. F. Hollifield. 1992. “Introduction: The Ambivalent Quest for Immigration Control.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, edited by W. A. Cornelius, P. L. Martin, and J. F. Hollifeld, 3–41. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favell, Adrian. 2001. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Martha S., and James G. March. 1981. “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (2): 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Gary P. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review 24 (4): 881–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25: 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Randall. 2000. Citizenship and Immigration in Post-War Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2011. 21011 Ideas and the Construction of Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, J. F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1983. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayblin, Lucy. 2019. “Imagining Asylum, Governing Asylum Seekers: Complexity Reduction and Policy Making in the UK Home Office.” Migration Studies 7 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien. 2011. “Speaking of Change: Why Discourse is Key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Richard W. 1995. Institutes and Organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and J. W. Meyer. 1991. “The Organization of Societal Sectors.” In Brun, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 108–140. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slaven, Mike. 2022. “The Windrush Scandal and the Individualization of Postcolonial Immigration Control in Britain.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 45 (16): 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaven, Mike, and Christina Boswell. 2019. “Why Symbolise Control? Irregular Migration to the UK and Symbolic Policy-Making in the 1960s.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (9): 1477–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winship, Christopher. 2007. “Policy Analysis as Puzzle Solving.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Michael Moran, Martin Rein, and Robert E. Goodin, 109–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar