References
- BRYANT, T.N. (2002) Computer software for calculating confidence intervals (CIA), in: D.G. ALTMAN, D. MAGEN, T.N. BRYANT & M.J. GDR (Eds) Statistics with Confidence, 2nd edn (London, BMJ Books) pp. 208–213.
- CARULE, S., BARNET, S., SEFTON, A. & UTHER, J. (1998) Medical problem-based learning supported by intranet technology: a natural student-centred approach, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 50, pp. 225–233.
- CASE, S.M. & SWANSON, D.B. (2001) Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences (Philadelphia, PA, National Board of Medical Examiners).
- CODERRE, S.P., HARASYM, P., MANDIN, H. & Floc, G. (2004) The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts, BMC Medical Education, 4, p. 23.
- COFFEY, M. & GIBBS, G. (2001) Reliable student feedback: a replication of the factor structure of the SEEQ, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, pp. 89–93.
- COLLIVER, J.A. (2000) Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: research and theory, Academic Medicine, 75, pp. 259–266.
- DAVIS, M.H. & HARDEN, R.M. (1999) AMEE Medical Education Guide no 15: Problem-based learning: a practical guide, Medical Teacher, 21, pp. 130–140.
- DAVIS, M.H. & HARDEN, R.M. (2001) E is for everything—e-learning?, Medical Teacher, 23, pp. 441–444.
- EI I AWAY, R., DEWHURST, D. & GUMMING, A. (2003) Managing and supporting medical education with a virtual learning environment—the Edinburgh Electronic Medical Curriculum, Medical Teacher, 25, pp. 372–380.
- HARDEN, R.M. & HART, I.R. (2002) An international virtual medical school (IVIMEDS): the future for medical education?, Medical Teacher, 24, pp. 261–267.
- HENRY, R.C. & WRIGHT, D.E. (2001) When do medical students become human subjects of research? The case of program evaluation, Academic Medicine, 76, pp. 871–875.
- MARSH, H.W. (1982) SEEQ: a reliable and useful instrument for collecting student evaluations of university teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, pp. 77–95.
- NEWBLE, D.I., on behalf of the Curriculum Review Team (2002) Revised Medical Curriculum Vision Statement. University of Sheffield. Available at http://www.shef.ac.uk/-'dme/cd/vision.htm (accessed 23 May 2004).
- NIEUWENHUB7EN KRUSEMAN, A.G., KOLLE, L.F. & SCHERMER, A.J. (1997) Problem-based learning at Maastricht — An assessment of cost and outcome, Education for Health, 10, pp. 179–187.
- NORMAN, G. (2003) RCT= results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments, Medical Education, 37, pp. 582–584.
- PRIDEAUX, D. & BLIGH, J. (2002) Research in medical education: asking the right questions, Medical Education, 36, pp. 1114–1115.
- ROBERTS, C., LAWSON, M., NEWBLE, D.I. & SELF, A. (2003) Managing the learning environment in undergraduate medical education: the Sheffield Approach, Medical Teacher, 25, pp. 297–301.
- SCHMIDT, H.G. (1983) Problem based learning: description and rationale, Medical Education, 17, pp. 11–16.
- SWANSON, D.B., CASE, S.M. & vAN DER VLETJTEN C.P. (1991) Strategies for student assessment, in: D. BOUD & G. FELE-rti, (Eds) The Challenge of Problem-based Learning (London, Kogan Page).