391
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on assessable key tasks

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 720-725 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • Archer J, Davies H. Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT) for consultants: screening for poorly performing doctors. 2002, AMEE Bern 2002 PDFP61 Abstract 7F1 [available at: http://www.amee.org]
  • Boud D. Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 2000; 22(2)151–167
  • Christopher DF, Harte K, George CK. The implementation of. Tomorrow's Doctors, Medical Education. 2002; 6: 282–288
  • Cross P. Getting the most out of SSMs. Student BMJ 2003; 11: 336–337
  • Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Medical Education. 2002; 36: 800–804
  • Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. Department of Health, London 2000
  • Department of Health. Medical Schools: Delivering the Doctors of the Future. Department of Health, London 2004
  • Dreissen EW, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CPM. Use of portfolios in early undergraduate medical training. Medical Teacher. 2003; 25: 18–23
  • General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. General Medical Council, London 1993
  • General Medical Council. The New Doctor. General Medical Council, London 1997
  • General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. General Medical Council, London 2002
  • General Medical Council. License to Practice and Revalidation for Doctors. General Medical Council, London 2003
  • GMC, website (n.d.) http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/itnd.htm [accessed 31 March 2004]
  • GMC, website (n.d.) http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/visitrep.htm [accessed 31 March 2004]
  • Gordon J. Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Medical Education. 2003; 37: 335–340
  • Leung W-C. Is there a better alternative to SSMs?. Student BMJ. 2002; 10: 4–5
  • Murdoch-Eaton D, Ellershaw J, Garden A, Newble D, Perry M, Robinson L, Smith J, Stark P, Whittle S. Student selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on purpose. Medical Teacher. 2004; 26: 33–38
  • Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Medical Education 2004; 38: 199–203
  • Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Medical Education. 2003; 37: 464–469
  • O’Neil PA, Morris J, Baxter CM. Evaluation of an integrated curriculum using problem-based learning in a clinical environment: the Manchester experience. Medical Education 2000; 34: 222–230
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Subject Benchmark Statements: Medicine 2002, [available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/cmtwork/benchmark/phase2/medicine.pdf, accessed 29 August 2002]
  • Searle J. Defining competency—the role of standard setting. Medical Education. 2000; 34: 363–366
  • Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, Cumming AD, Evans PA, Friedman Ben David M, Harden RM, Lloyd D, McKenzie H, McLachlan JC, McPhate GF, Percy-Robb IW, MacPherson SG. The Scottish doctor—learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Medical Teacher. 2002; 24: 136–143
  • Stark P. Tomorrow's Doctors: much quoted; but has it been fully implemented?. Medical Education. 2002; 36: 212–213
  • Stephenson A, Higgs R, Sugarman J. Teaching professional development in medical school. Lancet. 2001; 357: 867–870
  • Van Luijk SJ, Smeets JGE, Smits J, Wolfhagen I, Perquin MLF. Assessing professional behaviour and the role of academic advice at the Maastricht Medical School. Medical Teacher. 2000; 22: 167–171
  • Wass V, McGibon D, van der Vleuten C. Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximise validity?. Medical Education 2001; 35: 326–330
  • Yates MS, Drewery S, Murdoch Eaton DG. Alternative learning environments: what do they contribute to professional development of medical students?. Medical Teacher. 2002; 24: 609–615

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.