References
- http://www.accme.org, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (2005) ACCME website. Available at:
- Downing SM. Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: do multiple-choice item writing principles make any difference?. Academic Medicine 2002; 77: S103–104
- Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2005; 10: 133–143
- Downing SM. Selected-response item formats in test development. Handbook of Test Development, SM Downing, TM Haladyna. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2006; 287–301
- Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Test item development: validity evidence from quality assurance procedures. Applied Measurement in Education 1997; 1: 61–82
- Haladyna TM. Developing and Validating Multiple-choice Test Items, 3rd. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2004
- Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 2002; 15: 309–344
- Messick S. Validity. Educational Measurement, 3rd, RL Linn. American Council on Education and Macmillan, New York 1989; 13–104
- New England Journal of Medicine 2005, NEJM website. Available at: http://www.nejm.org