References
- Azer SA. Challenges facing PBL tutors: 12 tips for successful group facilitation. Med Teach 2005; 27: 676–681
- Belbin RM. Team Roles at Work. Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier 1993
- Christopher DF, Harte K, George CF. The implementation of Tomorrow's Doctors. Med Educ 2002; 36: 282–288
- Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching professionalism: general principles. Med Teach 2006; 28: 205–208
- Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CPM. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1230–1235
- Downie RS, Hendry RA, MacNaughton RJ, Smith BH. Humanising medicine: a special study module. Med Educ 1997; 31: 276–280
- Fletcher G, Agius RM. The Special Study Module: a novel approach to undergraduate teaching in occupational medicine. Occ Med 1995; 45: 326–328
- GMC (General Medical Council). Tomorrow's Doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. GMC, London 1993 revised 2002
- GMC (General Medical Council). Strategic Options for Undergraduate Medical Education – Final Report 2006, Available online at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/med_ed/index.asp (accessed 21 August 2007)
- Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 2007; 9: 38–42
- Korszun A, Winterburn PJ, Sweetland H, Tapper-Jones L, Houston H. Assessment of professional attitude and conduct in medical undergraduates. Med Teach 2006; 27: 704–708
- Lazarus PA, Rosslyn FM. The Arts in Medicine: setting up and evaluating a new special study module at Leicester Warwick Medical School. Med Educ 2003; 37: 553–559
- Liverpool Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. Detailed in the School of Medical Education MBChB Generic Programme Handbook 2007, Available online at: http://www.liv.ac.uk/sme/ (accessed 21 August 2007)
- Murdoch-Eaton D, Ellershaw J, Garden A, Newble D, Perry M, Robinson L, Smith J, Stark P, Whittle S. Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on purpose. Med Teach 2004; 26: 33–38
- Parker M. Assessing professionalism: theory and practice. Med Teach 2006; 28: 399–403
- Pulito AR, Donnelly MB, Plymale M. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students’ performance. Med Educ 2007; 41: 667–675
- Robinson L, Drewery S, Ellershaw J, Smith J, Whittle S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Research governance: impeding both research and teaching? A survey of impact on undergraduate research opportunities. Med Educ 41 2007; 729–736
- Ross M, Cameron HS. Peer Assisted Learning: a planning and implementation framework. Med Teach 2007; 29: 527–545, AMEE Guide to Medical Education No. 30. August 2007. Association of Medical Education in Europe, Dundee, UK
- Sandars J. Twelve tips fro using blogs and wikis in medical education. Med Teach 2006; 28: 680–682
- Schonrock-Adema J, Heijne-Penninga M, Van Duijn MAJ, Geertsma J, Cohen Schotanus J. Assessment of professional behaviour in undergraduate medical education: peer assessment enhances performance. Med Educ 41 2007; 836–842
- Scottish Teaching Deans’ Medical Curriculum Group. Scottish Doctor 2002, Available online at: http://www.scottishdoctor.org/ (accessed 21 August 2007)
- Short LM, Cotton D, Hodgson CS. Evaluation of the module on domestic violence at the UCLA School of Medicine. Acad Med 1997; 72: 75–92
- Stark P, Ellershaw J, Newble D, Perry M, Robinson L, Smith J, Whittle S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on assessable key tasks. Med Teach 2005; 27: 720–725