References
- Case S, Swanson DW. Item writing manual: Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. National Board of Medical Examiners publications. 2004, retrieved in 2004, from: http://www.nbme.org/aboutitem/writing.asp
- Downing SM. Guessing on selected-response examinations. Med Educ 2003; 37: 670–671
- Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: The consequences of using flawed items on achievement examinations in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ 2005; 10: 133–143
- Fremtidens speciallæge. Betenkning fram speciallægekommissionen. Sundhedsministeriet, København 2000; 178–179
- Haladyna TM, Downing SM. Validity of taxonomy of multiple-choice item writing rules. Appl Meas Educ 1989; 2: 51–78
- Haladyna TM, Downing SM. How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item?. Educ. Psychol Measure 1993; 53: 999–1010
- Hegstad AC, Materstvedt LJ, Kaasa S. Undervisning i medisinsk etikk: Trondheims-modellen (Education in medical ethics: The Trondheim Model). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen (J Norw Assoc) 2004; 124: 2104–2106
- Irwin WG, Bamber JH. The cognitive structure of the modified essay question. Med Educ 1982; 16: 326–331
- Jozefowicz RF, Koeppen BM, Case S, Galbrath R, Swanson D, Glew RH. The quality of in-house medical school examinations. Acad Med 2002; 77: 156–161
- Osterlind SJ. Constructing test items2nd. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1998
- Prideaux D, Gordon J. Can global co-operation enhance quality in medical education? Some lessons from an international assessment consortium in medical education. Med Educ 2002; 37: 404–405
- Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. ABC of learning and traching in medicine: Written Assessment. BMJ 2003; 326: 643–645
- Tarrant M, Ware J. The impact of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievment in highy-stakes nursing assessments. Med Educ 2008; 43: 198–206
- Tarrant M, Kneirim A, Hayes SK, Ware J. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions in high stakes nursing examinations. Nurse Educ Today 2006; 26: 662–671