Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students

References

• Ainley M. Connecting with learning: motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educ Psychol Rev 2006; 18: 391–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. The role of meta-learning in study process. Br J Educ Psychol 1985; 55: 185–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Vic., Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn 1987
   Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol 1993; 63: 3–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. The revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol 2001; 71: 133–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower GH, Clark MC, Lesgold AM, Winzenz D. Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1969; 8: 323–343
   Google Scholar
• Chapman DM, Calhoun JG. Validation of learning style measures: Implications for medical education practice. Med Educ 2006; 40: 576–583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou C. Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. Br J Educ Technol 2003; 34: 265–279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff A. Quality of learning on an MBA programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Educ Psychol 2003; 23: 123–139
   Google Scholar
• Emery JL. Numbers of A-level Examinations Taken by Candidates in England 2006 and the Percentages Attaining 3 or more A grades. Statistics Report Series No. 6. , University of Cambridge, Cambridge Assessment, CambridgeUK 2007
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ, Kozeki B. Relationships between school motivation, approaches to studying and attainment among British and Hungarian adolescents. Br J Educ Psychol 1985; 55: 124–138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding Student Learning. Croom Helm, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Eynde PO, Turner JE. Focusing on the complexity of emotion issues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educ Psychol Rev 2006; 18: 361–376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman D, Nyatanga L, Rich T. E-learning and educational diversity. Nurse Educ Today 2002; 22(1)76–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RA, Mcmanus IC, Winder BC. The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis. Br J Educ Psychol 2001; 71: 511–530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson A. On qualitative differences in learning. IV. Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. Br J Educ Psychol 1977; 47: 244–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelb DJ. Is newer necessarily better? Assessment of a computer tutorial on neuroanatomical localization. Neurol 2001; 56: 421–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahne AK, Benedorf R, Frey P, Herzog S. Attitude towards computer-based learning: Determinants as revealed by a controlled intervention study. Med Educ 2005; 39: 935–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton IR, Foster WH, Richardson JTE. Improving student learning using the personalised system of instruction. Higher Educ 1998; 35: 187–203
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan AS, Murphy GL. Category learning with minimal prior knowledge. J Experimental Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cog 2000; 26: 829–846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerfoot BP, Conlin PR, Mcmahon GT. Comparison of delivery modes for online medical education. Med Educ 2006; 40: 1137–1138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink EA. Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educ Psychol Rev 2006; 18: 307–314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka K, Olkinuora E, Makinen J. Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educ Psychol Rev 2004; 16: 301–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning–I: Outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol 1976a; 46: 4–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning–II: Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. Br J Educ Psychol 1976b; 46: 115–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC. Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: Prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students. Br Med J 1999; 319: 542–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC, Sproston KA. Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: Prospective study. Br Med J 1998; 316: 345–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newble D, Clarke RM. The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in a problem-based medical school. Med Educ 1986; 20: 267–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden P, Entwistle NJ. Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying. Br J Educ Psychol 1981; 51: 368–383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson L. On qualitative differences in learning. III. Study skill and learning. Br J Educ Psychol 1977; 46: 233–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooth D, Tonge K, McManus IC. Anxiety and study methods in preclinical students: Causal relation to examination performance. Med Educ 1989; 23: 416–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Ashwin P. Undergraduate Students’ Experience of Learning at the University of Oxford. University of Oxford, Oxford 2003
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Educ 1999; 37: 57–70
   Google Scholar
• Vogel M, Wood DF. Love it or hate it? Medical students’ attitudes to computer-assisted learning. Med Educ 2002; 36: 214–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins DA. Learning theories and approaches to research: A cross-cultural perspective. The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences, DA Watkins, JB Biggs. CERC and ACER, Hong Kong 1996; 3–24
   Google Scholar
• Watkins D, Hattie J. The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors. Br J Educ Psychol 1981; 51: 384–393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins D, Hattie J. A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learn 1985; 4: 127–141
   Google Scholar
• Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomised, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture. Med Educ 2001; 35: 847–854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar