Heutagogic approach to developing capable learners

References

• Argyris C, Schon D. 1978. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton J, Newman L. 2006. An unfinished symphony: 21st century teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. BJET. 37:825–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton J, Elliott R. 2007. Juggling the balls study, work, family and play: student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy. Eecera. 15:167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bhoyrub J, Hurley J, Neilson GR, Ramsay M, Smith M. 2010. Heutagogy: an alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse Educ Pract. 19:322–326.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke LM. 2012. Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. Irrodl. 13:56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke LM. 2014. Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Res Learn Technol. 22:21635.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns LG, Hase S. 1996. ‘Capability and re-engineering in educational change’, paper presented at the Second ACEID – UNESCO International Conference, Re-engineering for Change: Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Chapnick S, Meloy J. 2005. Renaissance eLearning: creating dramatic and unconventional learning experiences. Essential resources for training and HR professionals. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, editors. 2012. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane T, Bateman R. 2009. Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. In same places, different spaces. Proceedings. ASCILITE Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Cristiano MJ. 1993. I want to learn what I want to learn in the way I choose to learn it: Using learning contracts. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Great Ideas for Teaching Speech (GIFTS), Community College Interest Group, February 14.
   Google Scholar
• Devi V, Ramnarayan K, Abraham RR, Pallath V, Kamath A, Kodidela S. 2015. Short-term outcomes of a program developed to inculcate research essentials in undergraduate medical students. J Postgrad Med. 61:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel CE. 1997. Not just a method but a way of learning. In: Boud D & Feletti G, editors. The challenge of problem based learning. 2nd ed. London: Kogan; p. 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner A, Hase S, Gardner G, Dunn SV, Carryer J. 2008. From competence to capability: a study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs. 17:250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert J. 1975. Contract learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 16–19, 1975. Ft. Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Hase S, Kenyon C. 2000. From andragogy to heutagogy [Internet]. Ultibase, RMIT. Available from: http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hase S, Kenyon C. 2007. Heutagogy: a child of complexity theory. Complicity. 4:111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hase S. 2009. Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: some challenges and opportunities. Impact. 1:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hase S. 2011. Learner defined curriculum: heutagogy and action learning in vocational training, Southern Institute of Technology Journal of Applied Research, Special Edition on Action Research [Internet]. Retrieved 15th February 2013. Available from: http://sitjar.sit.ac.nz/Publications/SITJAR%20AR%20edition%20A.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ingleton J. 1999. Emotion in learning: a neglected dynamic. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 12–15 July. Available from: http://www.herdsa.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/conference/1999/pdf/Ingleton.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. 2011. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J Comput Assist Learn. 27:119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon C, Hase S. 2001. Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education [Internet]. Available from: http://www.avetra.org.au/abstracts_and_papers_2001/Hase-Kenyon_full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon C, Hase S. 2010. Andragogy and heutagogy in postgraduate work. In T. Kerry, editor. Meeting the challenges of change in postgraduate education. London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles M. 1975. Self-directed learning. A guide for teachers and learners. Chicago: Follet.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles MS. 1978. The adult learner. 2nd ed. Houston (TX): Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuit JA, Fell A. 2010. Web 2.0 to pedagogy 2.0: a social-constructivist approach to learning enhanced by technology. In: Critical design and effective tools for e-learning in higher education: theory into practice. United States: IGI Global; p. 310–325.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin R, du Boulay B, Smith H, et al. 2005. Using mobile technology to create flexible learning contexts. JIME. 22:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin R, Clark W, Garnett F, Whitworth A, Akass J, Cook J, et al. 2011. Learner-generated contexts: a framework to support the effective use of technology for learning. In Lee MJW, McLoughlin C, editors. Web 2.0-based E-learning: applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; p. 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe M, Hargreaves D, Winter A, Chadwick G. 2008. Does Pedagogy Still Rule? In 19th Annual Conference of Australasian Association for Engineer Education, 7–10 December. Yeppoon: Central Queensland University.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin C, Lee MJW. 2007. Social software and participatory learning: pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era, ASCILLITE, Singapore [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps R, Hase S. 2002. Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connection. Educ Action Res. 10:507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps R, Hase S, Ellis A. 2005. 'Competency, capability, complexity and computers: exploring a new model for conceptualizing end-user computer education. BJET. 36:67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers CR. 1969. Freedom to learn: a view of what education might become. Columbus (OH): Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG. 2011. Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 16:465–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Hart CS. 2015. The capability approach for medical education: AMEE Guide no. 97. Med Teach. 37:6:510–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturmberg JP, Farmer L. 2009. Educating capable doctors-a portfolio approach. Linking learning and assessment. Med Teach. 31:e85–e89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay BH, Hase S. 2004. Role of action research in workplace PhDs. ALAR. 9:81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate OTJ, Kusurkar R, Williams GC. 2011. How self-determination can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE Guide no. 59. Med Teach. 33:961–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker M. 2008. A human capabilities framework for evaluating student learning. Teach Higher Educ. 13:477–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A. 2008. Learner-generated contexts: critical theory and ICT education. Limassol, Cyprus: ETPE.
   Google Scholar
• Williams GC, Deci EL. 1999. The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Ann Intern Med. 129:303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GC, Saizow RB, Ryan RM. 1999. The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med. 74:992–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar