Boosting clinical performance: The impact of enhanced final year placements

References

• Braniff C, Spence RA, Stevenson M, Boohan M, Watson P. 2016. Assistantship improves medical students' perception of their preparedness for starting work. Med Teach. 38:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan N, Corrigan O, Allard J, Archer J, Barnes R, Bleakley A, Collett T, De Bere SR. 2010. The transition from medical student to junior doctor: today's experiences of Tomorrow's Doctors. Med Educ. 44:449–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford B, Ellis E, Williamson A, Forest I, Vance G. 2015. Learning opportunities in ‘student assistantships’. Clin Teach. 12:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cox K. 1990. No Oscar for OSCA. Med Educ. 24:540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming G. 2012. Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut M. 2000. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br J Educ Psychol. 70:113–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut M. 2004. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Cont Educ. 26:247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut M. 2007. Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Rev Educ 33:403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullbrook A, Ross M, Mellanby E, Wylde K, Jaap A, Cameron H. 2015. Initial experiences of a student assistantship. Clin Teach. 12:310–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GMC. 2011. Clinical placements for medical students – Advice supplementary to Tomorrow's Doctors (2009) [Online]. [cited 2015 30 April]. Available: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Clinical_placements_for_medical_students_1114.pdf_56437824.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldacre MJ, Lambert TW, Svirko E. 2014. Foundation doctors' views on whether their medical school prepared them well for work: UK graduates of 2008 and 2009. Postgrad Med J. 90:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldacre MJ, Taylor K, Lambert TW. 2010. Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys. BMC Med Educ. 10:78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. 1999. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med. 74:1129–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2013. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. 22.0 ed. Armonk, NY: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen JS, Ma IW, Hatala R, Cook DA. 2015. A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ. 49:161–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C, Burford B, Spencer J, Peile E, Davies C, Baldauf B, Allen M, Johnson N, et al. 2008. How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. London: General Medical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Illing JC, Morrow GM, Rothwell Nee Kergon CR, Burford BC, Baldauf BK, Davies CL, Peile EB, Spencer JA, Johnson N, Allen M, et al. 2013. Perceptions of UK medical graduates' preparedness for practice: a multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job. BMC Med Educ. 13:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K, Ramachandran S. 2012. Conceptual framework for performance assessment: Competency, competence and performance in the context of assessments in healthcare – Deciphering the terminology. Med Teach. 34:920–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster S, Zukas M, Quinton N, Roberts T. 2011. Preparedness is not enough: understanding transitions as critically intensive learning periods. Med Educ. 45:1006–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightman E, Kingdon S, Nelson M. 2015. A prolonged assistantship for final-year students. Clin Teach. 12:115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe L, Bullock A, Cole J, Gormley G, Kaufhold K, Kelly N, Mattick K, Rees C, Scheffler G, Jefferies C, et al. 2014. How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? Final report from a programme of research commissioned by the General Medical Council. General Medical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. 2013. Advancing the objective structured clinical examination: sequential testing in theory and practice. Med Educ. 47:569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr G, Macrae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. 1998. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med. 73:993–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid AM, Ledger A, Kilminster S, Fuller R. 2014. Can the tools of activity theory help us in advancing understanding and organisational change in undergraduate medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20:655–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell C, Burford B, Morrison J, Morrow G, Allen M, Davies C, Baldauf B, Spencer J, Johnson N, Peile E, et al. 2012. Junior doctors prescribing: enhancing their learning in practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 73:194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallentire VR, Smith SE, Cameron HS. 2012. Designing a purposeful student assistantship. Clin Teach. 9:210–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ten Cate O. 2013. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities add to a competency based curriculum. J Graduate Med Educ. 5:157–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Vleuten C. 2000. Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training. BMJ. 321:1217–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson TJ, Frampton CM, Thompson-Fawcett M, Egan T. 2003. Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment. Acad Med. 78:219–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar