Realist evaluation of faculty development for medical educators: What works for whom and why in the long-term

References

• 1st International Conference on Faculty Development in the Health Professions [Internet]. 2011. Toronto, Canada. [cited 2011 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.facultydevelopment2011.com
   Google Scholar
• 2nd International Conference on Faculty Development in the Health Professions [Internet]. 2013. Prague, Czech Republic. [cited 2013 Sep 9]. Available from: http://www.facultydevelopment2013.com
   Google Scholar
• 3rd International Conference on Faculty Development in the Health Professions [Internet]. 2015. Singapore. [cited 2015 May 4]. Available from: https://medworks.nus.edu.sg/apmec/apmec12/conference/home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barlett P, Rappaport A. 2009. Long term impact of faculty development programs. The experience of Teli and Piedmont. Coll Teach. 57:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. 2007. Qualitative data analysis with NViVo. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein DA. 2013. Essentials of psychology. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bland CJ, Schmitz CC, Stritter FT, Henry RC, Alieve JJ. 1990. Successful faculty in academic medicine: essential skills and how to acquire them. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brissette A, Howes D. 2010. Motivation in medical education: a systematic review. Webmed Cent Med Educ. 1:WMC001261.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B. & New, C. editors. 2004. Making realism work. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark A. 2011. Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen R, Murnaghan L, Collins J, Pratt D. 2005. An update on master's degrees in medical education. Med Teach. 27:686–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel F, Kanz KG, Tesche A. 2000. Training and certification of teachers and trainers: the professionalisation of medical education. Med Teach. 22:517–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. 2002. A critical review of evaluations of interprofessional education [Internet]. London, Higher Education Academy Learning and Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences and Practice. [cited 2012 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.health.ltsn.ac.uk/publications/occasionalpaper/occasionalpaper02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GMC. 2012. Recognising and approving trainers: the implementation plan. London: General Medical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hafferty F. 2008. In search of a Lost Chord: professionalism and medical education’s hidden curriculum. In: Wear D & Bickel J, editors. Educating for professionalism: creating a culture of humanism in medical education. Iowa City (IA): University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison C, Hogg W. 2003. Why do doctors attend traditional CME events if they don't change what they do in their surgeries? Evaluation of doctors' reasons for attending a traditional CME programme. Med Educ. 37:884–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. 2011. Higher Education Academy, Revised UK Professional Standards Framework [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Kearsley G, Shneiderman B. 1998. Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educ Technol. 38:20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL. 1994. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin AJ. 2007. Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. Br J Educ Psychol. 77:413–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AJ. 2008. Enhancing student motivation and engagement: the effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemp Educ Psychol. 33:239–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. 2012. A realist approach for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. 2013. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mclean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk J. 2008. Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach. 30:555–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod PJ, Mcleod AH. 2004. Personal view if formal CME is ineffective, why do physicians still participate? Med Teach. 26:184–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod PJ, Steinert Y. 2010. The evolution of faculty development in Canada since the 1980s: Coming of age or time for a change? Med Teach. 32:e31–e35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical schools Council. 2010. Medical schools in the UK, 2010 [Internet]. [cited 2010 Jul 15]. Available from: http://www.medschools.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousands Oak (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miliszewska I, Horwood J. 2004. Engagement theory: a framework for supporting cultural differences in transnational education. HERDSA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Misch DA. 2002. Andragogy and medical education: are medical students internally motivated to learn? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 7:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon JA. 1999. Reflection in learning and professional development:theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• O’sullivan PS, Irby DM. 2015. What motivates occasional faculty developers to lead faculty development workshops? A qualitative study. Acad Med. 90:1536–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R. 1996. Theorising the interview. Br J Sociol. 47:295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R. 2006. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R. 2013. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. 2004. Realist evaluation [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec]. Available from: http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Purcell N, Lloyd-Jones G. 2003. Standards for medical educators. Med Educ. 37:149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J. 2001. Understanding motivation and emotion. Fort Worth: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2004. Self-determination theory: a dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In: Mcinerney D & Van Etten S, editors. Big theories revisited. Greenwich (CT): Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer A. 2000. Realism and social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. 2006. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 66:701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. 2002. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 33:464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield I, Tolson D. 2010. Scottish football museum reminiscence pilot project for people with dementia: a realistic evaluation. Glasgow: School of Health Glasgow Caledonian University.
   Google Scholar
• Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, Clarke M, Eccles MP, Fitzpatrick R, Wong G, Sheikh A. 2009. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLOS Med. 6:e1000086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobral DT. 2004. What kind of motivation drives medical students learning quests? Med Educ. 38:950–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorinola O, Thistlethwaite J, Davies D. 2013. Motivation to engage in personal development of the educator. Educ Prim Care. 24:226–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorinola OO, Thistlethwaite J. 2013. A systematic review of faculty development activities in family medicine. Med Teach. 35:e1309–e1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorinola OO, Thistlethwaite J, David D, Peile E. 2015. Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20:385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Macdonald ME, Boillat M, Elizov M, Meterissian S, Razack S, Ouellet MN, Mcleod PJ. 2010. Faculty development: if you build it, they will come. Med. Educ. 44:900–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. 2006. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 28:497–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiten W. 2013. Psychology: themes and variations. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson TJ, Wells JE, Bushnell JA. 2007. Medical student characteristics associated with time in study: is spending more time always a good thing? Med Teach. 29:106–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtczak A, Schwarz MR. 2000. Minimum essential requirements and standards of medical education. Med Teach. 22:555–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. 2012. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ. 46:89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley S, Dornan T. 2012. Kirkpatrick's levels and education 'evidence'. Med Educ. 46:97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar