Twelve tips for creating an academic teaching portfolio

References

• Allen TD, Lentz E, Day R. 2006. Career success outcomes associated with mentoring others: a comparison of mentors and nonmentors. J Career Dev. 32:272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre K, Heartfield M, Cusack L. 2017. Evidence: what do I have and what do I need. In: Portfolios for health professionals. Chapter 4. 3rd ed. Chatswood: Elsevier Australia; p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Cook DA. 2007. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 29:210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk RA. 2005. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int J Teach Learn Higher Educ. 17:48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava P, Patel BV, Iyer RS, Moshiri M, Robinson TJ, Lall C, Heller M. 2014. Academic portfolio in the digital era: organizing and maintaining a portfolio using reference managers. J Digit Imaging. 28:10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran L, Gusic M, Baldwin C, Turner T, Zenni E, Lane L, Balmer D, Baron M, Rauch D, Indyk D, et al. 2009. Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities. Acad Med. 84:58–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates W. 2012. Being a mentor: what’s in it for me? Acad Emerg Med. 19:92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Dolmans D, Cleland J, Mennin S, Zubair A, Gibbs T. 2012. The AMEE research committee: initiatives to stimulate research and practice. Med Teach. 34:458–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexman A, Gelb A. 2011. Mentorship in anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 24:676–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graduate Medical Council. 2017.General Medical Council: Working with doctors working for patients. 2013–2017. Manchester: General Medical Council; [accessed 2017 Jul 19]. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/teaching_training.asp
   Google Scholar
• Gusic ME, Baldwin CD, Chandran L, Rose S, Simpson D, Strobel HW, Timm C, Fincher RM. 2014. Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions. Acad Med. 89:1006–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RN, Laidlaw JM. 2012. Ten questions to ask when planning a curriculum. In: Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medical education. Chapter 11. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; p. 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson PN, Smith KM. 2007. The teaching portfolio: a useful guide for pharmacists’ teaching goals. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 64:352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JL. 2006. Evaluating training programs. 3rd ed. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn G. 2004. Faculty development: the educator’s portfolio: it’s preparation, uses, and value in academic medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 11:307–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovato C, Wall D. 2013. Chapter 27, Program evaluation: improving practice, influencing policy, and decision-making. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; p. 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod S. 2012. Making SMART goals SMARTER. Physician Exec. 38:68–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts LW, Termuehlen G. 2013. (Honest) letters or recommendation. Acad Psychiatry. 37:55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues J, Rodrigues J, Sengupta A, Ramoutar D, Maxwell S. 2010. Are UK junior doctors being taught to teach? Med Educ. 44:324–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwellnus H, Carnahan H. 2014. Peer-coaching with health care professionals: what is the current status of the literature and what are the key components necessary in peer-coaching? A scoping review. Med Teach. 36:38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui ZS, Jonas-Dwyer D, Carr SE. 2007. Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching. Med Teach. 29:297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D, Fincher RM, Hafler JP, Irby DM, Richards BF, Rosenfeld GC, Viggiano TR. 2007. Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 41:1002–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D, Hafler J, Brown D, Wilkerson L. 2004. Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 79:783–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. 2010. Making it all happen: faculty development for busy teachers. In: Cantillon P, Wood D, editors. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Chapter 16, 2nd ed. London (UK): BMJ Books; p. 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett B, Centeno A, Naismith L, Prideaux D, Spencer J, Tullo E, Viggiano T, et al. 2016. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a 10-year update: BEME guide no. 40. Med Teach. 38:769–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan PB, Buckle A, Nicky G, Atkinson SH. 2012. Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool. BMC Med Educ. 12:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R. 2008. What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med. 83:452–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweet C, Blythe H, Carpenter R. 2016. Why the revised bloom’s taxonomy is essential to creative teaching. National Teach Learn Forum. 26:7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S, Chie QT, Abraham M. 2014. A qualitative review of literature on peer review of teaching in higher education: an application of the SWOT framework. Rev Educ Res. 84:112–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigelaar DH, Dolmans DM, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen IP, van der Vleuten CPM. 2006. Participants’ opinions on the usefulness of a teaching portfolio. Med Educ. 40:371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar